基于债券融资风险偏好与定价逻辑的固有属性，科技型企业融资特征与传统债券市场的供给模式之间存在适配性 不足的挑战。 从期限与定价机制来看，债券市场的期限结构、风险定价体系与科技型企业研发投入高、盈利周期长、现金流波 动大的资金需求存在一定的结构性错配，短期融资难以支撑长期研发投入，而高风险特征又导致融资成本高企。 对此，需要引导更多的长期资金、耐心资本参与科技型企业债券投资，同时，进一步发展壮大信用增进、活跃信 用衍生品市场，为信用风险的分散分担创造良好的市场环境。 提升债券市场与科技金融的适配性 截至2025年7月末，我国债券市场存量规模接近190万亿元，是服务企业直接融资的主要场所，对服务科技创新融 资需求具有独特优势。同时，由于债券资金具有固定收益、到期还本付息的属性，天然更倾向于市场认可度高、 信用资质良好的企业。因而，债券市场需要针对科技创新周期相对较长、不确定性较大的融资特征，进行创新性 制度安排，以进一步提升债券市场对科技创新的适配性。 从债券融资属性角度分析 作者｜包香明「中国银行间市场交易商协会副秘书长」 文章｜《中国金融》2025年第17期 科技创新是引领高质量发展的第一动力，科技金融已成为 ...

Report Industry Investment Rating - No relevant content provided Core Viewpoints - Recent intensive implementation of a package of support measures for scientific and technological innovation and supporting arrangements for the "technology board" reflects enhanced policy consistency, improved operability, and expanded scope of benefits, with a clear support orientation. The more detailed mechanism arrangements for each link of science - and - technology innovation bonds (STIBs) are conducive to driving more financial resources into the scientific and technological innovation field, stimulating innovation power and market vitality, and helping to cultivate new productive forces and build a modern industrial system [2] Summary by Directory I. Enrich the product system of STIBs, optimize the issuance process, and accelerate the construction of a multi - tiered bond market - The new round of incremental policies around the issuance end takes multiple measures in aspects such as the scope of issuers, issuance terms, information disclosure, and use of raised funds, promoting the improvement of the adaptability of bond services and the further play of the financing function of the bond market [3] - The "Announcement" focuses on supporting three types of institutions, including financial institutions, technology - based enterprises, and equity investment institutions, to issue STIBs. The trading association further clarifies the specific requirements for technology - based enterprises and equity investment institutions, and the exchanges also newly support eligible financial institutions and equity investment institutions to issue STIBs, expanding the scope of issuers [3][4] - The policies give issuers certain options in terms of issuance methods, financing terms, and bond terms, and optimize the issuance management process and registration and issuance mechanism. Both the inter - bank and exchange markets apply the "green channel" for STIB financing review, simplifying the requirements for application materials and improving the review speed [4] - The information disclosure rules for STIBs are simplified. The "Announcement" allows issuers to agree with investors to exempt relevant disclosure information, and the trading association further clarifies the specific arrangements. Both markets also allow eligible issuers to apply for an extension of the validity period of financial reports [4] - The policies balance flexibility and standardization in the use of raised funds. For technology - based enterprises, the use of funds is flexibly arranged, and at the same time, a supervision account for raised funds is required to ensure the compliance and effectiveness of fund use [4] - The STIBs have achieved rapid development since their launch, with a current stock scale of about 1.85 trillion yuan. Nearly 500 market institutions plan to issue over 300 billion yuan of STIBs. After the implementation of incremental measures, more entities may enter the STIB market, and the market structure is expected to be more diversified [5] II. Improve the investment mechanism in multiple ways, strengthen the coordination between investment and financing, and optimize the ecological environment of the STIB market - Improving the investment mechanism of STIBs helps enhance the trading activity and price discovery function of STIBs, improve the pricing efficiency and investment confidence of the market, and reduce the issuance and financing costs of enterprises [6] - The policies encourage intermediary institutions to participate in market - making of STIBs and establish an evaluation system. The exchanges have introduced optimization measures to support the pledge financing of STIBs, enhancing the liquidity support for STIBs [6][7] - Long - term funds are included in the scope of investment subjects for STIBs, which helps meet the demand of science - and - technology innovation enterprises for long - term capital, promotes the formation of a diversified investor pattern, and enhances the stability and risk - resistance ability of the STIB market [7] - The creation of STIB indices and related index - linked products is encouraged, which provides convenient risk - dispersion and long - term holding tools for institutional investors, promotes the development of passive investment strategies, and improves the issuance attractiveness and fund - raising ability of STIBs [7] III. Improve the diversified risk - dispersion and sharing mechanism, strengthen the role of credit enhancement, and boost market confidence - The "Announcement" emphasizes improving the risk - dispersion and sharing mechanism for STIBs. On one hand, it increases the support of policy - based tools and encourages market - based credit enhancement. Financial institutions and professional credit enhancement institutions are supported to carry out relevant businesses to support the issuance and trading of STIBs [9] - On the other hand, it promotes the role of regional credit enhancement mechanisms. Local governments are guided to set up risk compensation funds or introduce other preferential policies to provide support such as interest subsidies and government - backed financing guarantees for STIBs [9] - The exchanges encourage issuers to innovate credit enhancement methods, such as setting up pledge guarantees for expected returns and intellectual property rights in the bond issuance stage, exploring the use of intangible assets as collateral for bonds [9] IV. Innovate the credit rating system and construct a rating method suitable for technology - based enterprises and science - and - technology innovation businesses - Traditional rating ideas centered on assets and scale are difficult to meet the development needs of science - and - technology innovation enterprises. The "Announcement" proposes that credit rating agencies should design specialized rating methods and symbols according to the characteristics of relevant institutions and businesses, improving the forward - looking and differentiation of ratings [11][12] - Since 2024, rating agencies have served more than 1,500 STIBs and covered more than 460 STIB issuers. Multiple rating agencies have disclosed rating methods and models for science - and - technology innovation enterprises, but there are few practical cases of using specialized rating methods [12] - Under the policy guidance, credit rating agencies can focus on the characteristics of science - and - technology innovation enterprises, construct targeted rating frameworks, optimize the distribution of individual independent credit levels, and use new technologies such as big data and artificial intelligence to provide "rating +" services [12] V. Improve regulatory services, strengthen the whole - process management of STIBs, and reduce fees to strengthen policy support - The "Announcement" deploys the whole - process management and policy support for STIBs from the perspective of regulatory services, aiming to ensure the use of raised funds as intended and promote financial institutions to strengthen continuous support for innovative entities [13] - The bond market self - regulatory organizations are required to improve the supporting rules for STIBs, provide full - process services for issuance and trading, and reduce relevant fees. Specific measures have been introduced, such as the Shanghai Stock Exchange waiving the issuance subscription fees and trading fees for STIBs, and other exchanges and institutions also following suit [13][14] - The trading association has introduced measures to strengthen information disclosure requirements during the duration of bonds and improve post - issuance tracking and monitoring, enhancing the effectiveness of regulatory services and risk - prevention levels for STIBs [14]