"普刊基本都能发""国庆活动北大核心期刊1.4万元，即可赠送知网普刊一篇""不见刊全额退款"…… 近日，一些读者来信反映，在网络平台遇见了买卖论文、代写代投的机构。这些商家承诺"包过包 发""快速见刊"，借此获取不法收入，破坏学术环境。 代发论文的网络店铺除了承诺"包过包发"，还表示可提供代写服务。 北京海淀区读者汪女士在某平台找到一家名为"正刊世界"的店铺。对方称"没有文章我们可以全 包"，完全按照客户的需求拟题写作。代写代发明码标价，一篇普刊价格在4000元至6000元不等，一篇 核心期刊论文则报价4万至6万元。 "您要是明年6月用，现在得立马安排。"客服以期刊版面紧缺、投刊价格逐年上涨为由，催促汪女 士及早下单，"马上2026年又要涨价了，现在安排是价格最合适的。" 另一家宣称可发核心期刊的店铺商品链接中，有评论称："同事两年前找他们发过核心期刊，所以 我也直接找了他们。"据客服介绍，写作到发表周期为3至6个月，"走内部渠道投刊"。 【责任编辑：张胶】 一些店铺采用了更加隐蔽的推广方式。汪女士反映，有论文代写代发机构的客服添加她的个人账 号，不断私信推销广告。"客服通过扫描公开二维码加入了校园活动群，伪 ...

"普刊基本都能发""国庆活动北大核心期刊1.4万元，即可赠送知网普刊一篇""不见刊全额退款"……近 日，一些读者来信反映，在网络平台遇见了买卖论文、代写代投的机构。这些商家承诺"包过包发""快 速见刊"，借此获取不法收入，破坏学术环境。 对于上述现象，中国人民大学教育学院教授胡娟认为，一些学校学术评价体系中的"唯论文"现象，催生 了论文买卖市场，"代写的论文往往缺乏原创性、思想性，只要同行评议专家能认真审阅，不难发现问 题。" 胡娟认为，在学术人才评价中，若只重论文数量、期刊等级等指标，忽视研究方向、成果质量与学术潜 力，便容易"只见论文不见人"。对学术机构的评价也普遍将论文数量、期刊等级纳入指标，压力层层传 导，师生可能为完成任务而放弃潜心钻研，甚至转向购买论文。 另一家宣称可发核心期刊的店铺商品链接中，有评论称："同事两年前找他们发过核心期刊，所以我也 直接找了他们。"据客服介绍，写作到发表周期为3至6个月，"走内部渠道投刊"。 点开客服的推广信息，大量稿件录用通知映入眼帘，所涉领域广泛。"今年又一批刊物要截止了，需要 预约的抓紧时间联系""专业可靠质量有保障，一对一服务""看着别人论文都纷纷出版，晋升机 ...

Core Viewpoint - The "paper ghostwriting industry" has emerged as a significant issue, with a well-organized and mature industry chain that undermines academic integrity and societal values [1][2]. Group 1: Industry Overview - The paper ghostwriting industry operates under the guise of "plagiarism check services" on e-commerce platforms and "paper tutoring" on social media, with "writing factories" employing writers to produce papers using AI tools [1]. - A single writer can produce up to 30 papers in a day, and a single online store can handle approximately 40,000 ghostwriting orders in a year [1]. Group 2: Impact on Academic Integrity - The existence of this industry harms the academic ecosystem and societal ethics by flooding academic journals and review systems with false papers, wasting research resources, and hindering knowledge innovation [2]. - The long-term presence of this "shortcut" leads to a detrimental trend where opportunists profit while diligent individuals suffer, ultimately degrading societal values [2]. Group 3: Recommendations for Regulation - Regulatory authorities should intensify efforts to investigate and combat the ghostwriting business, holding all participants in the industry chain legally accountable [2]. - E-commerce and social media platforms must implement effective regulatory mechanisms, such as keyword screening and account verification, to curb the spread of ghostwriting advertisements [2]. Group 4: Structural Reforms Needed - To fundamentally address the ghostwriting issue, reforms in the academic evaluation system are necessary to reduce the excessive demand for papers, which is linked to academic assessments, professional title evaluations, and project completions [3]. - Strengthening the rigor of paper reviews is essential to ensure that ghostwritten papers are less likely to be published, thereby reducing the incentive for individuals to purchase such papers [3].

Core Viewpoint - The article emphasizes the need to curb the rising trend of academic superficiality, which undermines scientific integrity and harms the academic ecosystem [1][2] Group 1: Issues in Academic Research - Recent incidents, such as undergraduates publishing 14 SCI papers, highlight a growing trend of seeking quick results and superficial achievements in academia [1] - The pursuit of quantity over quality leads to the proliferation of low-quality, duplicate, and fraudulent research outputs, wasting societal resources and hindering effective technological innovation [1] Group 2: Evaluation System and Its Impact - An inadequate evaluation system is identified as a significant root cause of academic superficiality, where the focus is primarily on the number of papers and projects, affecting promotions and awards [1][2] - The current "number-based heroism" evaluation system imposes heavy pressure on researchers, making it difficult for them to engage in deep, meaningful research [1] Group 3: Recommendations for Improvement - To combat academic superficiality, there is a call for reforming the evaluation system to focus on innovation, quality, effectiveness, and contribution [2] - Establishing a supportive environment for researchers, including protections for young talent and a clear distinction between long-term breakthroughs and short-term results, is essential [2] - Strengthening the integrity of academic research through mechanisms that penalize misconduct is crucial for maintaining academic purity [2]

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the innovative educational practices at Westlake University, emphasizing the need to break the homogenization of education and cultivate truly innovative scientists in the era of artificial intelligence [1][4]. Group 1: Educational Philosophy and Goals - Westlake University aims to cultivate "future scientists" and "problem solvers with human care," encouraging students to engage with current issues while aspiring for greater achievements [5]. - The university's educational innovation aligns with its founding vision, focusing on deepening the practice of nurturing talent over the past seven years [5]. Group 2: Reforming Evaluation Systems - Westlake University is implementing a new academic evaluation system that does not prioritize the quantity of academic papers or citation rates, instead focusing on the originality and substantive progress of research [6]. - The goal is to break free from the constraints of traditional metrics like "only papers" and "only impact factors," promoting a return to the essence of academic research [6]. Group 3: Innovative Talent Development - The university seeks to create an innovative educational system that "breaks the average and expands the variance," focusing on liberating thinking, reshaping evaluation standards, and reconstructing the educational ecosystem [7]. - Emphasis is placed on tolerating uncertainty, encouraging unconventional thinking, and breaking down interdisciplinary barriers to foster significant innovations [7]. Group 4: Regional Advantages and Future Aspirations - Westlake University, as a new type of research university, is positioned in Shenzhen, a city known for its reform and innovation, aligning its mission with the city's spirit [8]. - The university aims to attract top global scientists in the next 10-20 years, while acknowledging current challenges such as international uncertainties [9]. Group 5: Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Education - In the context of rapid AI development, students are encouraged to master foundational knowledge and skills, using critical thinking to understand and leverage AI for future innovations [10]. - The article highlights the importance of adapting educational principles to prepare students for the evolving landscape shaped by artificial intelligence [10].

Core Viewpoint - The article emphasizes the need to break the "paper-only" evaluation system in the medical field and establish a more reasonable promotion system that aligns with industry practices, ultimately improving healthcare service quality and restoring patient trust [1][4]. Group 1: Issues with Current Research Practices - A recent paper from two gynecologists at Fujian Provincial People's Hospital reported an implausible statistic of 64% male patients among 100 cases of endometriosis, leading to public outrage and a loss of trust in medical research [2]. - The prevalence of absurd research papers highlights the deep-rooted issue of formalism in academic evaluation and daily work, raising questions about the integrity of the peer review process [2][3]. - The article critiques the current standards of research paper review, suggesting that mere adherence to format and quantity of references has overshadowed the importance of logical data integrity [2][4]. Group 2: Motivations Behind Research Misconduct - The article discusses the underlying motivations for research misconduct, attributing it to unreasonable promotion mechanisms that prioritize publication over practical clinical experience [2][3]. - A gray market has emerged where medical professionals feel compelled to pay for publication in journals to advance their careers, indicating a systemic issue within the academic evaluation framework [2][4]. - The article argues that the promotion criteria for clinical staff, particularly nurses, should focus more on practical experience and ethical standards rather than academic publications [2][3]. Group 3: Recommendations for Improvement - The National Health Commission proposed in 2020 to scientifically set evaluation standards that move away from a strict focus on papers, degrees, and language proficiency, encouraging healthcare workers to engage more in frontline patient care [3][4]. - The article suggests that if the current public discourse leads to a reformed evaluation system, the demand for nonsensical papers will diminish, thereby eliminating the gray market for academic publications [4].