Group 1 - The core point of the news is the election of Anutin as the new Prime Minister of Thailand, supported by the People's Party, which holds nearly one-third of the seats in the lower house, leading to a minority government situation [1][2][4] - Anutin received 311 votes out of 490 total votes in the lower house, easily surpassing the required majority [2] - The People's Party has agreed to support Anutin under the condition that the new government must dissolve the lower house within four months, leading to new elections expected in February or March of next year [3][4] Group 2 - Anutin's leadership is seen as a potential opportunity to stabilize Thailand's political situation, although challenges remain due to the minority government structure [1][6] - The political landscape in Thailand is characterized by frequent power struggles and a lack of trust among political players, complicating Anutin's ability to govern effectively [6][7] - Economic growth in Thailand is under pressure, with forecasts indicating a growth rate of only 2% by 2025, significantly lower than neighboring countries [7]

【环球时报驻泰国特派记者 张矜若 环球时报记者 张旺 线一凡 陈欣】泰国自豪泰党党首阿努廷5日在国会下议院投票中获得过半数支持，当选新一任泰国总 理。阿努廷当选很大程度上得益于控制着下议院近1/3席位的人民党的支持，该党与阿努廷达成协议，其中包括阿努廷承诺在4个月内解散国会，这将导致明 年2月举行新的大选。人民党则坚持继续保持反对党地位，这使得阿努廷只能组建少数派政府，或将给其政策制定带来挑战。国际媒体普遍认为，即使已经 选出新总理，泰国政局仍可能持续动荡。但日本关西外国语大学副教授马克·科根告诉美国《时代》周刊，就目前而言，新总理的产生可能会结束泰国的一 段不稳定时期，并让阿努廷有机会证明自己的领导能力。不过，就在泰国投票选出新总理的前一天，前总理他信突然乘机前往迪拜，称是去体检。而下周， 泰国法院可能对他作出判决，使其面临牢狱之灾。 " 我们没有太多时间了 " 为换取支持，阿努廷与人民党党首纳塔蓬签署谅解备忘录，确定人民党支持自豪泰党的条件：新政府必须在提交施政报告后的4个月内解散下议院，这意味 着新大选预计将在明年2月或3月举行；必须承诺组织民选制宪会议，就新宪法的起草进行全民公投，人民党长期以来一直寻 ...

Core Viewpoint - The election victory of Lee Jae-myung reflects the public's strong desire for political change and dissatisfaction with former President Yoon Suk-yeol's authoritarian measures, particularly the controversial six-hour martial law declaration [1][2][3]. Group 1: Election Context - Lee Jae-myung won the election with 51.7% of the votes, significantly ahead of Kim Moon-soo's 39.3% and Lee Jun-seok's 7.7%, indicating a clear preference for change among voters [1]. - The election is viewed as a referendum on Yoon Suk-yeol's leadership style, particularly in light of his impeachment and the public's outrage over his martial law attempt [2][3]. - The Democratic Party of Korea (DPK) successfully framed the election as a reckoning against the forces behind the martial law, emphasizing the need for constitutional reforms to prevent such abuses of power in the future [2][3]. Group 2: Lee Jae-myung's Background and Campaign - Lee Jae-myung's personal story of overcoming poverty and adversity resonates with many voters, particularly the youth and working-class citizens who see him as a symbol of hope [1][8][17]. - His campaign focused on constitutional reform and restoring democratic order, appealing to voters wary of Yoon Suk-yeol's authoritarian tendencies [3][10]. - Lee's previous political roles, including as mayor and governor, showcased his commitment to social justice and welfare policies, further solidifying his image as a reformer [12][14][16]. Group 3: Opposition Challenges - Kim Moon-soo's close ties to the discredited Yoon administration hindered his campaign, as he struggled to distance himself from the negative legacy of the previous government [6][12]. - The internal chaos within the People Power Party (PPP) during the primary elections weakened Kim's position, making it difficult for him to effectively challenge Lee [4][6]. - Lee's ability to position himself as the sole choice for liberal voters, despite facing his own controversies, highlights the PPP's failure to connect with disillusioned centrist voters [6][12][17].