中国传统文化中，自古崇尚"德主刑辅"，"道之以政，齐之以刑，民免而无耻。道之以德，齐之以礼， 有耻且格"。 德治，如何以新的载体，融入当下社会？ 在宜昌市西陵区综治中心，有一群"爷爷奶奶"很有名。 退休前，他们是企业经理、人社干部、人事主管……退休后，他们年均调解各类矛盾纠纷超过千件。 在法院"案多人少"的普遍困境之下，诉前调解的"银发力量"，解锁基层治理"心"钥匙。 四天后，他再次联系业主，引导双方重新对话。因双方情绪已经平稳，经过耐心沟通，最终物业承诺改 进服务，业主补缴费用，多年积怨就此化解。 "此路不通，就换一条路。"今年56岁的徐宏林，退休前在人社部门工作30余年，她的绝招是"迂回法"： 去年11月，9名网络主播被负责人拖欠工资，对方失联。徐宏林发现其业务挂靠于某电商公司，便转而 与电商公司沟通，通过政策讲解和联系电商公司负责人的好友辗转沟通，最终推动公司为每人补偿800 元，化解了这起棘手的劳资纠纷。 目前，西陵区综治中心的"爷爷奶奶"调解团队已有6人，丰富的人生阅历和沟通智慧，让他们在调解桌 前发光发热。 "银发力量"巧解千家结 "如果对方像您这样跟我说话，问题早就解决了。"1月26日上午，一位 ...

文化的核心功能之一是凝聚价值共识。区域特色文化承载着当地群众世代传承的行为准则与价值追求， 将其融入现代治理实践之中，能使治理目标从"政府要求"转化为"群众自觉"。衢州将南孔文化"礼让谦 和、和睦相处"的价值理念，通过"典故明礼""伦理溯源"等具象化表达，将抽象文化基因转化为群众可 感知的解纷共识，在文化浸润中形成"有事好商量"的共识，最终达到"礼让三分 事了人和"的目的。这 种基于文化认同的解纷方式，突破了"非黑即白"的对抗思维，让矛盾双方从"寸土必争"转向"以礼相 待"，实现"法结"与"心结"的双重化解。 （二）规范转化：从礼俗传统到治理规则的落地 优秀传统文化中的礼俗规范，通过与现代治理制度衔接，形成"软约束"与"硬规则"的协同效应，这是文 化赋能治理的关键落脚点。衢州将南孔"礼治"理念嵌入解纷全流程和全场景，形成了"礼待、礼辩、礼 让、礼和"四步解纷工作法。同时，引导部门、县（市、区）以及村（居）根据自身工作特点，将"礼 治"融入具体的工作之中。比如柯城法院构建拓展"换位知礼、典故明礼、法理融礼、践诺达礼、源治育 礼、自治守礼"的"六礼工作法"。柯城区上洋村不仅将"红白喜事一餐制、彩礼限额"等礼治要求 ...

（来源：光明日报） 转自：光明日报 《何以经世：儒家治道及其现代意义》 方朝晖 著 商务印书馆 为了建立新的解释框架，作者引入了文化心理学这一核心工具。他认为，在文明的表层制度背后， 存在着一种如"河床底部岩石"般稳定的"集体无意识"。它内化于语言习俗，规定着共同体的思维与情 感。作者将其中最稳固的成分提炼为三大"文化预设"：其一，此世取向。与追求"彼岸救赎"或"轮回解 脱"的文明不同，中华文明将感官所及的现世视为唯一且终极的真实。这一预设决定了中国思想注重"务 为治者"，致力于在此世内部寻求秩序与安顿；其二，关系本位。与西方原子式的自主"个人"不同，中 国人是在亲疏远近的关系网络中定义自我、寻求安全感的。个体的意义嵌入在与他人、家庭乃至天地的 相互依赖中，人伦秩序的和谐因此成为衡量社会治乱的根本标准；其三，团体主义。作为关系本位的延 伸，个人倾向于在更大的集体（家族、国家）中寻求身份认同和庇护。这种心理需求构成了中国历史上 对"大一统"政治格局持久向往的深层动因。作者认为，儒家之所以能脱颖而出，正在于它最深刻地体察 并回应了这三大预设，提出了一套契合中国文化心理的社会整合方案。 通过借鉴马克斯·韦伯的"理想 ...

Core Viewpoint - The "Three Governance Integration" system under the leadership of the Party is essential for grassroots governance, combining self-governance, rule of law, and moral governance to address the evolving social contradictions and modernize the national governance system [1][6][7]. Historical Context of "Three Governance Integration" - The concepts of self-governance, rule of law, and moral governance have historically played significant roles in Chinese social governance, with their integration facing challenges due to the tension between official and unofficial governance [2][3]. - The historical roots of these governance ideas can be traced back to ancient Chinese philosophies, which emphasized the importance of self-governance, legal governance, and moral governance [2][3]. Development of the "Three Governance Integration" System - Since the establishment of the People's Republic of China, self-governance, rule of law, and moral governance have continued to play crucial roles in grassroots governance, with significant legal frameworks established to support these systems [3][4]. - The integration of these governance methods is seen as a response to the changing social landscape and the need for a more effective governance model that addresses the complexities of modern society [6][7]. Theoretical Implications of "Three Governance Integration" - The integration emphasizes the complementary strengths of self-governance, rule of law, and moral governance, aiming to create a more effective grassroots governance framework [7][8]. - The Party's leadership is crucial in guiding this integration, ensuring that governance is responsive to community needs while maintaining order and promoting moral values [8][12]. Practical Innovations in "Three Governance Integration" - Various local practices have emerged, such as the "One Agreement, Two Meetings, Three Groups" model and the village contract management model, showcasing the adaptability and effectiveness of the "Three Governance Integration" approach [15][16]. - The establishment of community discussion halls has also been a significant innovation, enhancing residents' participation in governance and decision-making processes [16]. Challenges and Conditions for Implementation - Despite the progress, challenges remain, including limited depth and breadth of self-governance, insufficient legal governance capabilities, and declining moral constraints within communities [18][19]. - The successful implementation of the "Three Governance Integration" system requires a robust framework that encourages public participation, strengthens legal governance, and revitalizes moral education [20][21].