转自：环球时报 【持续发酵！#特朗普对爱泼斯坦案最新发声#】#特朗普称爱泼斯坦案是政治迫害# 据美国《国会山 报》报道，当地时间26日，美国总统特朗普将爱泼斯坦案称为"政治迫害"，并批评美国司法部在此事上 耗费精力。特朗普在"真实社交"平台上写道："现在又发现了100万份与爱泼斯坦相关的文件。司法部被 迫把所有精力都放在这场民主党炮制的骗局上。他们什么时候才能停止这种行为，转而调查选举舞弊等 问题？"他还说："与爱泼斯坦勾结的是民主党人，而不是共和党人。公布所有人的姓名，让他们蒙羞， 然后继续为我们的国家服务！他们不想让人们谈论我和共和党的成就，只想谈论早已死去的爱泼斯坦 ——这不过是又一场政治迫害！"25日，特朗普还发长文，试图撇清自己与爱泼斯坦的关系："那些卑鄙 之徒，把责任推卸给唐纳德·特朗普总统。事实上，只有特朗普真正与爱泼斯坦划清界限。"美国司法部 24日发声明称，发现超过100万份可能与爱泼斯坦案有关的文件，这些文件是纽约南区联邦检察官办公 室和联邦调查局发现的，已移交司法部。声明说，司法部将尽快公布这批文件，但由于文件数量庞大， 这一过程可能还需要数周时间。几个月来，特朗普多次对其支持者持续追问 ...

据美国《国会山报》报道，当地时间26日，美国总统特朗普将爱泼斯坦案称为"政治迫害"，并批评美国 司法部在此事上耗费精力。 25日，特朗普还发长文，试图撇清自己与爱泼斯坦的关系："那些卑鄙之徒，把责任推卸给唐纳德·特朗 普总统。事实上，只有特朗普真正与爱泼斯坦划清界限。" 据美国《新共和》杂志网站26日报道，针对特朗普的最新表态，爱泼斯坦案受害者公开指责特朗普"失 态"。美国司法部上周五公布了首批数十万份爱泼斯坦案文件，此后几天又陆续公布了更多内容。西班 牙埃菲社26日提到，特朗普最初并不支持公开爱泼斯坦相关文件。但在国会对此法案表示强烈支持后， 特朗普不得不改变立场，最终在11月19日签署了国会通过的《爱泼斯坦档案透明法》。 特朗普在"真实社交"平台上写道："现在又发现了100万份与爱泼斯坦相关的文件。司法部被迫把所有精 力都放在这场民主党炮制的骗局上。他们什么时候才能停止这种行为，转而调查选举舞弊等问题？"他 还说："与爱泼斯坦勾结的是民主党人，而不是共和党人。公布所有人的姓名，让他们蒙羞，然后继续 为我们的国家服务！他们不想让人们谈论我和共和党的成就，只想谈论早已死去的爱泼斯坦——这不过 是又一场政治迫害 ...

美国禁止欧委会前委员等5人入境 被指"政治迫害" 中新网12月24日电 综合外媒报道，美国国务院23日宣布禁止包括欧盟委员会前委员蒂埃里·布雷东在内 的5人入境，指控他们主导施压科技公司审查或压制美国观点的行动。 美国务卿称"随时准备扩大这份名单" 美国务卿鲁比奥在社交媒体上发文称，被列入签证禁令的5人"曾主导有组织的行动"，胁迫美国网络平 台进行内容"审查"，打压其反对的美国观点。 据路透社24日报道，布雷东曾任法国财政部长，并在2019年至2024年担任欧盟委员会负责内部市场的委 员，他是此次禁令中最引人注目的人物。 鲁比奥表示，特朗普政府绝不姑息此类行径，如果相关人员不改变立场，"随时准备扩大这份名单"。 欧委会前委员回应美签证限制："政治迫害" 布雷东当天在社交媒体平台上发文回应称"美国朋友，我们的审查并不是你们想象的那样"。他还质问 道："麦卡锡式的政治迫害又回来了吗？" 来源：中国新闻网 编辑：董文博 广告等商务合作，请点击这里 签证禁令被指是特朗普政府的反击 英国《卫报》24日报道称，此次美国国务院禁止五名欧洲人士入境的举动，是对欧洲针对仇恨言论和虚 假信息监管政策的最新反击。 报道分析称，近月 ...

美国国务院23日发布公告，对布雷东实施签证限制，禁止其进入美国。布雷东于2019年开始担任欧 盟委员会负责内部市场的委员，2024年9月辞职。 新华社布鲁塞尔12月23日电 欧盟委员会前委员蒂埃里·布雷东23日表示，美国拒绝向包括他在内的5 人发放签证是"政治迫害"。 "麦卡锡式的政治迫害又回来了吗？"布雷东在社交媒体上写道，"致我们的美国朋友：'（我们的） 审查并不是你们想象的那样'"。 ...

Core Points - The Brazilian Federal Supreme Court has ruled that former President Jair Bolsonaro's conviction for plotting a coup is now effective, with his sentence of 27 years and 3 months in prison starting immediately [1][2] - Bolsonaro is the first former president in Brazil to be convicted for plotting a coup, and his legal team plans to continue fighting the ruling [2][3] - Bolsonaro's imprisonment has sparked mixed reactions in Brazil, with progressive groups celebrating while his supporters claim he is a victim of political persecution [3][4] Summary by Sections Legal Ruling - The Supreme Court judge Alexandre de Moraes has rejected appeals from Bolsonaro's defense, confirming that all legal avenues have been exhausted, and he must serve his sentence [1] - Bolsonaro's imprisonment follows a series of events after his defeat in the 2022 elections, where he and his allies allegedly plotted to retain power illegally [2] Public Reaction - Progressive citizens in Brazil are expressing joy over Bolsonaro's imprisonment, viewing his presidency as disastrous for the environment and social justice [3] - Supporters of Bolsonaro are protesting his imprisonment, claiming it is unjust and politically motivated, with some predicting further demonstrations [3][4] Political Impact - Recent polls indicate a significant decline in Bolsonaro's influence, with only 13% of voters expressing unwavering support for him [4] - The size of gatherings organized by Bolsonaro's family has drastically decreased, reflecting a loss of mobilization power compared to his time in office [4]

Core Points - The article discusses former President Trump's unusual legal maneuver of suing himself for $230 million, claiming political persecution from various federal investigations [3][5][7] - Trump's lawsuit is unprecedented in U.S. history, as it involves a sitting president suing his own administration [5] - The compensation is intended to cover legal fees and potential damages from investigations, which Trump argues have caused him emotional distress and reputational harm [7][9] Summary by Sections Lawsuit Details - Trump filed the lawsuit on October 21, 2025, seeking $230 million from the Justice Department, which he leads [5] - He claims that investigations like the Russia probe and the 2020 election interference inquiry are politically motivated attacks [7] Financial Implications - Trump has stated that the compensation would be used for charitable purposes or renovations to the White House, including a $250 million project for a luxury ballroom [9] - The lawsuit's approval process is likely to be influenced by Trump's allies within the Justice Department, raising concerns about self-review [10] Legal and Political Context - The lawsuit is framed within the context of ongoing political tensions, with Trump viewing the investigations as a vendetta by the Democratic Party [15][19] - Trump's legal challenges, including multiple federal charges, have persisted into the 2024 election cycle, and he is leveraging his presidential position to avoid legal repercussions [19] Public Reaction - The lawsuit has drawn significant criticism, especially as it is perceived as exploiting taxpayer money during a fiscal crisis [12][13] - Trump's actions are seen as a strategic political move to reinforce his victim narrative and consolidate support for future elections [19]

Core Points - The lawyer for Federal Reserve Governor Cook provided a detailed defense regarding her mortgage application, arguing that discrepancies in the loan documents were either accurate at the time or "unintentional marks," and could not constitute fraud given the other information disclosed to lenders [1] - The Supreme Court has currently blocked Trump's attempt to remove her from office and will hear arguments in January [1] - Cook's lawyer also accused the Director of the Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA), Pruitt, of selectively targeting Trump's political opponents while ignoring similar allegations against Republican officials [1]

Core Points - Peru has severed diplomatic relations with Mexico due to Mexico's provision of political asylum to former Prime Minister Betssy Chavez, who is implicated in a failed coup attempt against former President Castillo [1][3] - The Mexican government expressed regret over Peru's decision, asserting that its actions are legitimate and in accordance with international law [1][3] Summary by Sections Diplomatic Relations - Peru's Foreign Minister Hugo de Cera announced the severance of diplomatic ties with Mexico, labeling Mexico's actions as "unfriendly" [3] - The current Peruvian President, José Yeri, supported the Foreign Minister's statements and demanded the Mexican chargé d'affaires leave Peru by a specified deadline [3] Political Context - The controversy stems from Chavez's involvement in the December 2022 coup attempt by Castillo, which led to her judicial proceedings and a request for a 25-year prison sentence [4] - The Mexican government has a historical tradition of providing asylum to political refugees, which has sparked discussions about its foreign policy consistency [5][6] Future Implications - Analysts suggest that the incident reflects broader issues regarding Mexico's diminishing diplomatic influence and the need for clear dialogue between Mexico and Peru [5] - The diplomatic rift between the two countries has roots dating back to 2022, when Mexico opposed the ousting of Castillo and provided asylum to his family [5]

Core Points - The article discusses allegations against Bill Pulte, the head of the Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA), for bypassing standard procedures in filing criminal complaints against Federal Reserve officials, including Lisa Cook, suggesting a politically motivated attack on perceived adversaries of the Trump administration [2][3][4] - Legal experts criticize Pulte's actions as violations of ethical standards and regulations designed to ensure impartiality in government decision-making [3][6] - The article highlights the potential implications of Pulte's actions on the independence of the Federal Reserve and the broader political landscape, as Trump seeks to exert influence over the institution [4][5] Group 1 - Pulte submitted criminal complaints directly to the Department of Justice, bypassing the FHFA's internal oversight, which is against established protocols [2][6] - The complaints against Cook and others are seen as part of a broader strategy by the Trump administration to target political opponents through legal means [2][3] - Legal experts indicate that Pulte's actions may undermine the legitimacy of the allegations and could affect his authority as the head of FHFA [3][6] Group 2 - Pulte's establishment of a new channel for reporting mortgage fraud has raised concerns among FHFA staff, as it appears to circumvent existing oversight mechanisms [6][7] - The article notes that Pulte has also filed similar complaints against other political figures, including New York Attorney General Letitia James and Congressman Adam Schiff, further indicating a pattern of politically charged legal actions [7][8] - The investigation into Cook's alleged mortgage fraud is complicated by conflicting reports regarding her property declarations, which may impact the credibility of the claims made by Pulte [8]

Group 1 - The U.S. government has revoked visas for several Brazilian officials, including Attorney General Jorge Messias and former Attorney General José Levi [1] - Sanctions have been imposed on the wife of Brazilian Supreme Court Justice Demócrito, resulting in the freezing of her U.S.-related assets [1] - The Brazilian Supreme Court has condemned the U.S. sanctions against Demócrito's wife as unjust [1] Group 2 - The Brazilian Federal Supreme Court convicted former President Bolsonaro of conspiracy to commit a coup, sentencing him to 27 years and 3 months in prison, marking him as the first former president in Brazil to be convicted for such a crime [2] - U.S. Secretary of State Rubio described the conviction as "political persecution" and indicated that the U.S. would take corresponding measures [2] - During the trial, former President Trump pressured the Lula government to halt the judicial investigation against Bolsonaro, labeling it as "political persecution" and threatened to impose a 40% tariff on Brazilian exports to the U.S. while sanctioning Justice Demócrito [2]