Group 1 - The article discusses the overestimation of tariff impacts, highlighting the non-linear diminishing elasticity of tariff shocks and the subsequent easing mechanism due to reflexivity, as well as the strengthening demand from emerging markets and import substitution [1] - Six major judgments regarding the domestic economy have been made, including the impact of tariff shocks, policy framework changes, and the new "three drivers" of economic growth [1] - The article emphasizes the resilience of exports, attributing the strong performance not to "export grabbing" but to mid-term resilience factors such as normal restocking cycles in developed countries and accelerated industrialization in emerging markets [3][4] Group 2 - The article outlines the current economic challenges, including weak domestic demand and fiscal constraints, and suggests that the government will enhance fiscal mechanisms to support economic transformation from investment-driven to consumption-led growth [5] - It highlights the increased scrutiny and accountability regarding hidden debts, particularly in lower-tier cities, indicating a shift towards more stringent regulatory measures [6] - The article discusses potential fiscal measures for the second half of 2025, including policy bank tools and government debt limits, to provide additional support if economic pressures arise [7] Group 3 - The article addresses the "anti-involution" movement, emphasizing its broader scope and stronger coordination compared to previous efforts, particularly in industries facing severe competition [8] - It points out that the current "anti-involution" initiative focuses on industry self-discipline and regional collaboration, aiming to alleviate the pressures of low-price competition [13] - The article corrects misconceptions about the nature of "involution," stressing that merely relying on upstream price increases will not effectively boost the Producer Price Index (PPI) [14] Group 4 - The article discusses the significance of the "14th Five-Year Plan" as a critical phase towards achieving modernization by 2035, focusing on high-quality development and key reforms [16] - It highlights the challenges posed by an aging population and the need for social security reform to ensure sustainability and equity in the system [18] - The article emphasizes the shift in industrial structure towards technology innovation and the importance of service sector development in the "15th Five-Year Plan" [19][20] Group 5 - The article identifies new consumption trends driven by demographic changes, suggesting that the evolving population structure will create significant opportunities in new consumption spaces [21] - It notes the potential for a 3.3 trillion yuan investment gap in the service sector, indicating a broad growth opportunity in service-oriented investments [27] - The article discusses the phenomenon of excess savings, which is primarily driven by reduced housing expenditures, suggesting that these savings are likely to be directed towards investment rather than consumption [26]

按时间线梳理，我们看对了什么？ 在市场对关税冲击悲观时，提示关税影响被"高估"。 壹 2025年4月12日 《 "高估"的关税冲击？ 》 对等关税2.0开启时，我们明确指出市场忽视了关税冲击弹性的"非线性递减"特征，忽视了关 税"反身性"所导致的"先冲击、后缓和"机制，低估了新兴市场需求走强、进口替代等影响。 国内经济，六大判断！ 今年以来，我们在关税冲击、政策框架转变、反内卷、新"三驾马车"等多领域均做出精准预判，且多 次提出了与市场主流预期不同的观点，可概括为六大重要判断： 一 贰 2025年5月14日 《 中国制造"难替代性" 》 我们从豁免清单、加价倍率、强依赖商品、"龙二"竞争力较弱等多个视角讨论了中国制造"难 替代性"，中美关税也迎来缓和。 叁 2025年8月19日 《 出口会否持续"超预期"？ 》 我们强调，今年出口走强并非源于市场认为的"抢出口"，而是中期韧性的体现，包括发达国家 正常补库周期、新兴市场工业化城镇化提速，以及我国在替代欧盟于新兴市场的份额。后续出 口仍有韧性。 提示本轮政策框架转变，总量政策空间打开， 防风险力度不减。 二 壹 2025年3月12日 《 财政注能 强振经济 》 ...