Workflow
合同纠纷
icon
Search documents
天晟新材: 关于重大诉讼事项的公告
Zheng Quan Zhi Xing· 2025-08-15 10:13
Core Viewpoint - The company, Changzhou Tiansheng New Materials Group Co., Ltd., is currently involved in a legal dispute with China Railway High-tech Industry Co., Ltd. regarding a contract dispute related to their joint venture, China Railway Rail Transit Equipment Co., Ltd. [1][4] Group 1: Legal Dispute Details - The company and China Railway High-tech established a joint venture in January 2018 with an initial registered capital of RMB 90 million, where China Railway held a 55% stake and Tiansheng held a 45% stake [1][2] - Tiansheng has completed a capital contribution of RMB 135,000, but has not fully paid the remaining capital contribution of RMB 4,365,000 by the deadline of March 30, 2020, leading to the current legal action [2][4] - The lawsuit has been registered at the Beijing Fengtai District People's Court, with the case number (2025) Jing 0106 Minchu 40196, and the court hearing has not yet commenced [2][4] Group 2: Financial Impact and Disclosure - The company is currently unable to reasonably estimate the potential impact of the lawsuit on its current and future profits, and will follow up on the case's progress to make necessary accounting adjustments as per accounting standards [3][4] - As of the announcement date, the company has reported other minor litigation matters totaling approximately RMB 1.1907 million, which do not meet the disclosure standards for significant litigation as per the Shenzhen Stock Exchange rules [2][3]
互喊赔钱!知名上市深企与一地区政府,合作决裂!涉案金额达数千万
Nan Fang Du Shi Bao· 2025-08-07 05:35
Core Viewpoint - The arbitration case between Shenzhen A-share listed company Huakong Saige and the Qitaihe Municipal Government has sparked widespread discussion, with both parties claiming their positions strongly and the case amounting to several tens of millions [1][5]. Group 1: Arbitration Case Development - On June 25, Huakong Saige and its subsidiary received the arbitration notice from the Qitaihe Arbitration Commission, marking the start of the arbitration process [1]. - A significant turning point occurred on July 23 when Huakong Saige received a counterclaim acceptance notice, escalating the conflict between the two parties [2]. - On August 6, Huakong Saige received an additional arbitration application, indicating further developments in the case [3][8]. Group 2: Contractual Dispute Details - The dispute centers around the 2019 investment contract for the lithium-ion battery anode material project, where the Qitaihe Municipal Government claims to have provided Huakong Saige with 50 million yuan in industrial support funds, but alleges that the company has not made further investments and has left the land idle [5]. - The Qitaihe Municipal Government is seeking to terminate the contract and demand the return of the 50 million yuan support funds, along with arbitration fees [5]. - In response, Huakong Saige argues that the government failed to fulfill its contractual obligations, such as constructing the factory and covering initial construction costs, which hindered project progress [5]. Group 3: Financial Implications - The total amount involved in the additional arbitration request is approximately 23.96 million yuan, which represents about 17.6% of Huakong Saige's revenue of 136 million yuan in the first quarter of 2025 [8]. - If Huakong Saige loses the arbitration, it could exert significant pressure on the company's financial performance [8]. Group 4: Company Background - Huakong Saige, a technology service provider listed since 1997, has undergone management changes, with its actual controller being Shanxi State-owned Capital Operation Co., Ltd. after a series of adjustments [8][10]. - The company has faced financial difficulties, including consecutive years of losses, but has seen some recovery since switching to the environmental protection sector in 2014 [10].
京运通: 关于累计诉讼、仲裁情况的进展及更正公告
Zheng Quan Zhi Xing· 2025-07-08 13:15
Group 1 - Beijing Jingyuntong Technology Co., Ltd. and its wholly-owned subsidiary Wuhai Jingyuntong New Materials Technology Co., Ltd. have been sued by Wuhai Haibowan Urban Construction Investment Co., Ltd. due to a contract dispute [1] - The lawsuit involves a claim for funds occupied interest amounting to 22,416,041.67 yuan calculated at an annual interest rate of 4.75% from June 1, 2019, to August 19, 2019, and thereafter at the loan market quoted interest rate until the actual payment date [1] - The company has corrected previously disclosed information regarding other cumulative litigation and arbitration cases, specifically changing the defendant in a construction engineering dispute from Shanxi Hongtu Construction Group to Wuhai Jingyuntong New Materials Technology Co., Ltd. [2]
江苏吉贝尔药业股份有限公司关于诉讼事项进展的公告
Core Viewpoint - The company, Jiangsu Jibeier Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., is currently involved in a legal dispute with Hubei Jiuzhoutonghe Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. regarding a contract dispute related to the promotion of the product Nicergoline Tablets, with ongoing appeals and potential impacts on the company's financials [2][4][6]. Group 1: Litigation Details - The case is at the appeal stage, with Jiuzhoutonghe applying for a protest against the court's decision to the Hubei Provincial People's Procuratorate [2][6]. - The company is the defendant in the original lawsuit and the plaintiff in the counterclaim, with the amounts involved being RMB 99,082,620 for the original case, RMB 6,000,000 for the counterclaim, and RMB 60,000,000 for both the appeal and the retrial stages [2][4]. - The Wuhan Intermediate People's Court and the Hubei High People's Court have issued civil judgments, and the Supreme People's Court has rejected Jiuzhoutonghe's retrial application [3][4][6]. Group 2: Financial Impact - As of the announcement date, the judgments and rulings are not expected to have a significant impact on the company's current or future profits [3][7]. - The outcome of Jiuzhoutonghe's protest remains uncertain, and the actual impact on the company's financials will depend on the results of this protest and its execution [3][7].
吉贝尔: 吉贝尔关于诉讼事项进展的公告
Zheng Quan Zhi Xing· 2025-07-02 16:15
Core Viewpoint - The company, Jiangsu Jibeier Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., is currently involved in a legal dispute with Jiuzhoutonghe regarding a contract related to the promotion of its product, Nigulol Tablets, with recent court rulings indicating that the company is not expected to face significant financial impact from the ongoing litigation [1][3][4]. Summary of Litigation Details - The case involves a contract dispute where Jiuzhoutonghe filed a lawsuit against the company, which subsequently filed a counterclaim [1][2]. - The Wuhan Intermediate People's Court issued a civil judgment in 2021, which Jiuzhoutonghe appealed, leading to a ruling from the Hubei High People's Court in 2022, and a subsequent rejection of Jiuzhoutonghe's request for a retrial by the Supreme People's Court in 2023 [2][3]. - The amounts involved in the litigation include RMB 99,082,620 for the original lawsuit, RMB 6,000,000 for the counterclaim, and RMB 60,000,000 for the appeal and retrial stages [2][3]. Current Status of the Case - Recently, Jiuzhoutonghe has requested the Hubei Provincial People's Procuratorate to file a protest against the previous court rulings, and the outcome of this protest remains uncertain [3][4]. - The company will continue to monitor the situation and fulfill its information disclosure obligations as required [4].
牛股利君股份子公司被诉拖欠工程款 上市公司认为对方存在质量不达标问题
Mei Ri Jing Ji Xin Wen· 2025-06-05 13:39
Core Viewpoint - The stock price of Lijun Co., Ltd. experienced a significant rise followed by a notable decline, coinciding with a legal dispute regarding unpaid project funds with a major contractor [1][5]. Group 1: Stock Performance - From May 6 to May 19, Lijun Co., Ltd. saw its stock price increase significantly, achieving "9 days 8 boards" of gains [1]. - Since the peak on May 19, the company's stock price has dropped nearly 20% [1][5]. Group 2: Legal Dispute - Lijun Holdings (Singapore) Pte. Ltd., a wholly-owned subsidiary of Lijun Co., Ltd., has been sued by China Metallurgical North (Dalian) Engineering Technology Co., Ltd. for unpaid project funds amounting to 33.73 million yuan [2]. - The lawsuit stems from a procurement contract related to the SINO iron ore project, with a total contract value of 173 million yuan, of which Lijun Holdings has already paid 120 million yuan [2]. - The company claims the non-payment is due to quality issues with the delivered work, and it intends to actively communicate and defend its rights in the legal proceedings [2][4].
首都在线: 关于公司募集资金专项账户部分资金被冻结的公告
Zheng Quan Zhi Xing· 2025-05-28 12:19
Core Viewpoint - Beijing Capital Online Technology Co., Ltd. has reported that a portion of its fundraising special account has been frozen by the Chaoyang District People's Court in Beijing due to a contractual dispute with Tianxiang Ruiyi Technology Co., Ltd. [1][2] Group 1: Financial Impact - The amount frozen in the special account is 6,224,699.02 yuan, which represents 1.82% of the net proceeds from the company's A-share issuance in 2022 and a negligible impact on the company's recent audited net assets [2] - The company asserts that the frozen funds will not significantly affect the implementation of its fundraising investment projects or its normal operations and management [2] Group 2: Legal Context - As of the announcement date, the case related to the asset preservation is in the pre-litigation mediation stage, and the company has not received any formal legal documents from the court regarding the case [2] - The freezing of funds is a result of Tianxiang Ruiyi's lawsuit and request for property preservation due to payment disputes between the two companies [1][2] Group 3: Company Response - The company plans to assert its legal rights and take necessary measures to protect the interests of the company and its shareholders, aiming to lift the bank account freeze as soon as possible [2] - The company will continue to monitor the situation and fulfill its information disclosure obligations based on subsequent developments [2]
ST八菱: 关于诉讼事项的进展公告
Zheng Quan Zhi Xing· 2025-05-15 10:22
Group 1 - The core issue involves a contract dispute between Impression Dinosaur Cultural Art Co., Ltd. and Guilin Dinosaur Valley Cultural Technology Co., Ltd., along with other parties, regarding the failure to complete theater construction as per the cooperation agreement [1][3] - The first-instance court ruled against Impression Dinosaur's claims, leading to an appeal to the Guangxi High Court [1][3] - The Guangxi High Court has recently issued judgments and rulings on both cases, including the annulment of the first-instance court's decisions and remanding the cases for retrial [4][5] Group 2 - The Guangxi High Court determined that the cooperation agreement could not be continued due to a contractual deadlock, thus ruling for its termination [4][5] - The court's ruling does not immediately resolve issues related to breach of contract and damages, which will require further examination by the first-instance court [4][5] - The company has stated that the judgment to terminate the cooperation agreement will not affect its main business operations, but the implications of the ruling on profits remain uncertain pending further legal proceedings [6]
两陕企“诉讼战”进展:三达膜一审败北
Mei Ri Jing Ji Xin Wen· 2025-05-13 10:17
Core Viewpoint - The ongoing legal dispute between two listed companies in Shaanxi, SanDa Membrane and Blue Sky Technology, centers around a contract worth 58.61 million yuan related to lithium extraction equipment, with a recent court ruling requiring SanDa Membrane to pay 48.29 million yuan to Blue Sky Technology [1][10]. Group 1: Contractual Dispute - The conflict originated from a contract signed in March 2022 for the supply and installation of lithium extraction equipment, valued at 114 million yuan, as part of a larger project [4][7]. - SanDa Membrane claims that Blue Sky Technology failed to meet installation deadlines, leading to economic losses and justifying their counterclaim for 38.73 million yuan [4][7]. - The court ruled in favor of Blue Sky Technology, ordering SanDa Membrane to pay the specified amount and rejecting SanDa's counterclaims [5][10]. Group 2: Legal Proceedings - SanDa Membrane plans to appeal the first-instance ruling, indicating that the legal battle may continue into a second trial [2][10]. - The ongoing litigation has resulted in the freezing of 58.61 million yuan of SanDa Membrane's assets, impacting its financial operations [4][12]. Group 3: Financial Impact - SanDa Membrane reported a significant decline in net cash flow from operating activities, down 78.38% year-on-year to 12.19 million yuan, attributed to the legal disputes and asset freezes [17]. - The company has also faced additional arbitration related to another project, further complicating its financial situation [12][16]. Group 4: Broader Context - Both companies are experiencing multiple legal challenges, with Blue Sky Technology also facing a lawsuit for 53.5 million yuan from an insurance company related to an accident involving another party [20].
仝卓实名举报33家关联公司偷税漏税,与前工作室合同纠纷将开庭
Yang Zi Wan Bao Wang· 2025-04-30 00:15
Core Viewpoint - Actor Tong Zhuo publicly accused 33 affiliated companies of tax evasion, emphasizing the importance of tax fairness for social development and public welfare [1]. Group 1: Allegations and Actions - Tong Zhuo submitted materials to relevant authorities regarding the tax evasion of 33 affiliated companies, calling for an investigation and urging others to join in protecting social justice [1]. - In a follow-up statement, Tong Zhuo clarified that his actions were not driven by a narrow mindset but were a legitimate effort to defend his legal rights and uphold the law [3]. - The tax authority in Shenyang has acknowledged receipt of the complaint but has not provided further details on whether an investigation will be initiated [3]. Group 2: Company Affiliations and Legal Issues - Tong Zhuo is associated with three companies, all of which are currently in a state of cancellation, including the recent cancellation of Liaoning Tong Xuehui Cultural Communication Co., Ltd. in August 2024 [7]. - A contract dispute involving Liaoning Liao Guang Media Co., Ltd., an affiliate of Tong Zhuo's former studio, is set to be heard in court on May 6, 2024 [7]. - The company Liaoning Liao Guang Media Co., Ltd. is co-owned by Hainan Ying'an Technology Co., Ltd. and Tong Zhuo's former agent, Guo Han, holding 90% and 10% of the shares respectively [7].