Core Viewpoint - The Chinese government maintains a firm stance against interference in its internal affairs and emphasizes the importance of adhering to established political agreements with Japan, regardless of the political leadership in Japan [1]. Group 1: China's Position on Japan - The Chinese government does not interfere in the internal affairs of other countries and opposes any actions that infringe upon its core interests or violate international law [1]. - China's policy towards Japan is described as clear, stable, and consistent, indicating a long-term approach to bilateral relations [1]. - The Chinese government insists that Japan must adhere to the four political documents between China and Japan, as well as Japan's pacifist constitution, fulfilling its commitments and international obligations [1].

Core Viewpoint - The Chinese government emphasizes its non-interference policy in other countries' internal affairs while firmly opposing any actions that infringe upon China's core interests and violate international law [1] Group 1: China's Position on Japan - The Chinese government maintains a clear, stable, and consistent policy towards Japan, regardless of the Japanese leadership or ruling party [1] - China insists that Japan must adhere to the four political documents between China and Japan, as well as fulfill its commitments under the Japanese Constitution and international obligations [1]

针对日本首相高市早苗近期一系列错误言论，日本大阪府日中友好协会评议员伊关要表示，相关表态损害日中政治基础，公然违背国际共识。日本应恪守既 有外交承诺，避免制造紧张与冲突。 大阪府日中友好协会评议员 伊关要：当然，我认为这是违宪的。所谓的"安保法制"，这一点同样存在违反宪法的嫌疑。日本宪法本身也是一项宣誓，日本 今后绝不再发动侵略战争。我认为，今后日本要实现发展，与中国的关系是最为重要的。 责编：张靖雯、侯兴川 日本有识之士：近年安保政策违背日本"和平宪法"精神 伊关要还指出，日本近年来推动的安保相关政策，违背日本"和平宪法"精神，与日本战后和平路线相悖。 大阪府日中友好协会评议员 伊关要：我认为这是一个非常重大的问题。一个中国原则，就是说，中华人民共和国政府是代表全中国的唯一合法政府，台湾 是中华人民共和国领土不可分割的一部分。高市早苗发表所谓"台湾有事"，可能构成日本"存亡危机事态"这样的言论，这正是赤裸裸地践踏一个中国原则的 行为，同时也是对1972年的《中日联合声明》以及1978年的《中日和平友好条约》的践踏。我认为这是性质极其严重的错误言论，因此，我认为必须坚决反 对，并要求其撤回。 ...

日本有识之士：近年安保政策违背日本"和平宪法"精神 针对日本首相高市早苗近期一系列错误言论，日本大阪府日中友好协会评议员伊关要表示，相关表态损害日中政治基础，公然违背国际共识。日本应恪守既 有外交承诺，避免制造紧张与冲突。 大阪府日中友好协会评议员 伊关要：我认为这是一个非常重大的问题。一个中国原则，就是说，中华人民共和国政府是代表全中国的唯一合法政府，台湾 是中华人民共和国领土不可分割的一部分。高市早苗发表所谓"台湾有事"，可能构成日本"存亡危机事态"这样的言论，这正是赤裸裸地践踏一个中国原则的 行为，同时也是对1972年的《中日联合声明》以及1978年的《中日和平友好条约》的践踏。我认为这是性质极其严重的错误言论，因此，我认为必须坚决反 对，并要求其撤回。 大阪府日中友好协会评议员 伊关要：当然，我认为这是违宪的。所谓的"安保法制"，这一点同样存在违反宪法的嫌疑。日本宪法本身也是一项宣誓，日本 今后绝不再发动侵略战争。我认为，今后日本要实现发展，与中国的关系是最为重要的。 伊关要还指出，日本近年来推动的安保相关政策，违背日本"和平宪法"精神，与日本战后和平路线相悖。 ...

Group 1 - Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi's remarks regarding Taiwan have drawn strong criticism from various Japanese political figures, highlighting a significant discontent within the political landscape [1][3] - Senator Takaichi's statement equating "Taiwan's situation" with "Japan's situation" suggests that Japan could be drawn into conflict even without direct attacks, which poses a serious threat to Japan's principle of pacifism [3][5] - The comments are seen as undermining the political foundation established during the normalization of Japan-China relations in 1972, which emphasized respect for China's stance on Taiwan [5][10] Group 2 - The current Japanese government's military expansion is viewed as a violation of the pacifist constitution, raising concerns about its implications for Japan's security policy [6][8] - Senator Takaichi emphasized that Japan's constitution, particularly Article 9, prohibits the possession of offensive military capabilities, which contradicts the government's current military strategies [8][10] - The government is criticized for using the pretext of a deteriorating security environment to justify military expansion, which is seen as a departure from Japan's post-war commitment to peace [10]

Group 1 - The statements made by Japanese Prime Minister Kishi Nobuo are seen as a serious violation of international law and basic principles of international relations, potentially undermining regional and global peace and stability [1][2] - Russian officials express that Kishi's remarks are provocative and an attempt to escape historical truths, challenging post-World War II international agreements, especially during the 80th anniversary of the victory in the anti-fascist war [1] - Concerns are raised about the implications of Kishi's comments on Taiwan, which are viewed as dangerous and indicative of a resurgence of militarism in Japan, prompting calls for international condemnation [1][2] Group 2 - Former Japanese Prime Minister Yukio Hatoyama criticizes Kishi's assertion regarding Taiwan, stating that it could lead Japan into a "survival crisis" and justifies China's criticism [2] - Japanese scholars highlight that Kishi's statements contradict Japan's pacifist constitution and violate international law, particularly regarding military intervention in Taiwan [2] - The remarks made by Kishi are characterized as reckless and a significant misstep, with implications for Japan's diplomatic stance on Taiwan and its adherence to the one-China principle [2]