2025年8月19日，由中国政法大学国际法学院/涉外法治学院主办、中国政法大学竞争法研究中心和中国 国际反垄断与投资研究中心协办的"2025本地生活服务市场竞争问题学术研讨会"在中国政法大学综合楼 0111会议室成功召开。会议聚焦数字经济背景下本地生活服务市场的竞争新形势，围绕平台补贴博弈、 数据治理与商户权益保护等前沿问题展开研讨。来自学术界、实务界和产业界的专家学者齐聚一堂，共 同探寻平台经济规范发展的法治化路径。 开幕式由中国政法大学国际法学院/涉外法治学院教授戴龙主持。戴龙教授指出，本地生活服务市场关 系到民生保障和经济活力，平台竞争的背后既有技术创新的推动力，也潜藏着排他性风险和监管困境。 他强调，研讨会旨在凝聚学界与实务界智慧，以法治思维厘清市场竞争边界，推动形成科学、健康与可 持续的治理方案。 (7) A . L . L . L . L . L . L . L . L . L . t & 李 时建中 市 焦 海 涛 黄 莉 :4 Jeans 365 官 张 FRANK 叶莹中 R and see see do d 9 17 P JR 9 2 r I . . . l 0 在"竞争关系与法律规制"单 ...

Core Viewpoint - The article emphasizes the need for a robust legal framework to combat counterfeit food products, highlighting the importance of establishing a system where the cost of illegal activities exceeds the benefits derived from them [1][2]. Group 1: Legal Framework and Enforcement - The current legal system in China includes laws such as the Anti-Unfair Competition Law, Trademark Law, and Food Safety Law, which collectively provide a comprehensive regulatory framework against counterfeit food [1]. - There is a call for clearer operational standards regarding legal concepts like "similar infringement" and "substantial similarity," which should include elements like packaging and color schemes [2]. - The article suggests increasing penalties for intentional and repeated infringement of food products to enhance deterrence [2]. Group 2: Technological Integration - The application of new technologies, such as blockchain, can create a traceability system from raw material procurement to end sales, improving oversight of counterfeit products [2]. - Smart algorithms can assist in monitoring e-commerce platforms for counterfeit food information, while satellite technology can help identify hidden processing locations [2]. Group 3: Collaborative Governance - Effective governance against counterfeit food requires collaboration among multiple stakeholders, including government agencies, businesses, platforms, and the public [3]. - Initiatives like internal whistleblower rewards, "red and black lists" for businesses selling counterfeit products, and industry associations promoting "genuine product commitments" are being implemented to enhance accountability [3]. Group 4: Market Dynamics and Innovation - The article highlights the importance of balancing the destruction of counterfeit products with the establishment of protective measures for genuine products, using the example of Heilongjiang Wuchang rice, which has implemented a traceability platform and increased R&D investment [3]. - The integration of legal protection and innovation is seen as a way to drive out counterfeit products from the market, demonstrating the principle of "good money drives out bad money" [3].