Overall Requirements - The article emphasizes the importance of strengthening the judicial work in the new era, guided by Xi Jinping's thoughts and the principles of socialism with Chinese characteristics, aiming to enhance social fairness and justice while improving the judicial system [3][4]. Strengthening Party Leadership - The article stresses the need for the Party to maintain leadership over judicial work, ensuring that the Party's policies and decisions are effectively implemented within the judicial system [4][5]. - It highlights the importance of political education within the judiciary, reinforcing the understanding of the socialist judicial system and enhancing the confidence in it [4]. Ensuring Judicial Independence - The article calls for support for the judiciary to exercise its powers independently and fairly, with strict measures against any interference in judicial activities [5]. High-Quality Development and Security - The article outlines the necessity of maintaining national security and social stability through strict legal measures against serious crimes, including terrorism and organized crime [7]. - It emphasizes the importance of creating a law-based business environment by punishing economic crimes and protecting property rights [8]. Judicial Protection of Rights - The article discusses the need for enhanced judicial protection in various sectors, including intellectual property, environmental resources, and civil rights, to promote social welfare [9][10][12]. Reforming the Judicial System - The article advocates for deepening judicial reforms, including improving the judicial responsibility system and optimizing the evaluation of judicial quality and efficiency [14][16]. - It emphasizes the importance of judicial transparency and the need for a robust system for public access to judicial information [17]. Support for Judicial Work - The article highlights the importance of building a digital court system to enhance efficiency and accessibility in judicial processes [18]. - It calls for strengthening the judicial workforce through improved training and management systems for judges and court staff [19][20].

Core Insights - In 2024, Chinese courts adjudicated 219,000 environmental resource cases, with compensation for ecological damage totaling 9.6 billion yuan, marking an 87.5% increase year-on-year [1] Group 1: Environmental Protection Enforcement - The Supreme Court revealed a case where four companies illegally mined resources under the guise of a wellness tourism project, resulting in significant geological damage and a loss of over 90 million yuan in mineral resources [2] - The Wuhan Intermediate Court imposed criminal liability on the companies for illegal mining and ordered them to pay over 12.9 million yuan for ecological service losses [2] - A detection company and its personnel were penalized for issuing 222 false environmental monitoring reports, leading to a fine of 200,000 yuan and prison sentences for responsible individuals [3] Group 2: Ecological Restoration and Preventive Measures - The Chongqing court executed a ruling to dismantle artificial fish nests in a critical spawning area to ensure ecological balance and protect fish populations [4] - The court mandated the construction of 1,961 square meters of artificial fish nests as a form of ecological restoration following illegal fishing activities [5] - A court in Huzhou issued a prohibition order to prevent activities threatening a newly discovered aquatic species, demonstrating proactive judicial measures for biodiversity protection [6] Group 3: Judicial Protection of Public Health - A pig farming cooperative was found responsible for polluting a drinking water source, affecting thousands of residents, leading to significant financial losses [7] - The Guang'an Intermediate Court ruled against the cooperative for environmental pollution, resulting in the dismantling of the pig farm and ongoing environmental restoration efforts [8] - The court provided judicial recommendations to local authorities to improve agricultural pollution management and prevent future incidents [9]

Core Viewpoint - The case highlights the illegal trade of endangered bird species in Ningxia, China, and emphasizes the need for stronger legal measures and ecological restoration efforts to protect wildlife and their habitats [1][2][4]. Group 1: Illegal Wildlife Trade - From 2021 to 2023, individuals engaged in the illegal acquisition and sale of wild birds and their eggs, including over 1,000 young birds and more than 6,000 eggs, some of which belonged to nationally protected species [1][2]. - The perpetrators used prohibited methods for hunting in restricted areas, leading to criminal charges against them for harming precious and endangered wildlife [2][4]. Group 2: Ecological Rescue Efforts - During the trial, one defendant continued illegal activities, resulting in the capture of over 2,800 heron eggs, which were found in poor conditions, leading to a coordinated rescue effort involving multiple agencies [3]. - A total of 86 million yuan was allocated for the rescue of the herons, and after four months of care, over 1,000 herons were successfully released back into the wild [3][4]. Group 3: Legal and Ecological Accountability - The court not only imposed criminal penalties but also required the defendants to compensate for ecological damage and the costs associated with the care of the birds, totaling over 1.9 million yuan [4]. - The case serves as a model for integrating legal accountability with ecological restoration efforts, showcasing a comprehensive approach to wildlife protection [4][6]. Group 4: Collaborative Environmental Protection - The court has initiated collaborations with various environmental and natural resource departments to create a framework for ecological protection and legal education [6]. - New regulations have been established to ensure that compensation for ecological damage can be used for wildlife rescue efforts, indicating a proactive approach to wildlife conservation [6].

Core Points - The Supreme People's Court reported that in 2024, a total of 219,000 environmental resource cases were adjudicated, including 4,168 environmental public interest litigation cases and 246 ecological damage compensation cases, with a total compensation amounting to 9.6 billion yuan [1] - The court emphasized strict enforcement of environmental protection laws and penalized over 4,900 cases related to environmental pollution, including criminal, civil, and administrative cases [1] - The establishment of 2,424 specialized environmental resource trial institutions and the involvement of over 16,000 judges and judicial assistants in environmental resource trials were highlighted, indicating a significant investment in judicial capacity [1] Summary by Category Environmental Litigation - In 2024, the courts concluded 4,168 environmental public interest lawsuits and 246 ecological damage compensation cases, with total compensation reaching 9.6 billion yuan [1] - The courts processed over 4,900 criminal, civil, and administrative cases related to environmental pollution [1] Judicial Capacity Building - By the end of 2024, 2,424 specialized environmental resource trial institutions were established, with more than 16,000 judges and judicial assistants dedicated to environmental resource trials [1] - Over 1,700 courts implemented specialized handling of environmental resource criminal, civil, and administrative cases [1] Collaborative Efforts - The courts are enhancing collaboration between administrative enforcement and judicial work, including a special campaign against fraudulent practices by third-party environmental service organizations [1] - More than 1,000 comprehensive ecological environment judicial protection (restoration) bases have been established to improve systemic protection levels [1]

Core Viewpoint - The Supreme People's Court of China emphasizes strict legal actions against environmental violations, particularly focusing on fraudulent activities by third-party environmental service providers and illegal waste disposal practices [1][2]. Group 1: Legal Actions Against Environmental Violations - A case involving a testing company revealed that the defendants provided 222 false environmental monitoring reports, earning over 760,000 yuan. The court sentenced the company to a fine of 200,000 yuan and imposed prison terms on six individuals ranging from nine months to one year and two months, prohibiting them from engaging in environmental monitoring for three years post-sentence [1]. - In another case, a resin technology company and its personnel were found guilty of illegally discharging over 20,000 tons of hazardous waste into the Yangtze River. The company was fined 6 million yuan, and the individuals received prison sentences ranging from two years to six years and six months, with a compensation mechanism involving cash and technological improvements [1]. Group 2: Promoting Green Transformation and Conflict Resolution - The courts are actively resolving conflicts arising from the green transformation of the economy, focusing on ecological and environmental disputes that affect people's lives. In a contract dispute case, a biomass energy company refused to accept over 7,000 tons of cow dung, leading to outdoor accumulation. The court applied green principles from the Civil Code to facilitate the reuse of the waste through various methods, including the production of biomass pellets [2]. - In a separate case, a livestock cooperative was found guilty of repeatedly discharging wastewater, contaminating drinking water sources and disrupting water supply to nearby villages. The cooperative was fined 400,000 yuan, and the responsible individual received a four-year prison sentence along with a fine of 100,000 yuan [2].

这些报告涉及陕西省西安市、榆林市、宝鸡市、渭南市、咸阳市等五个地市44家委托单位，涵盖能 源、化工、钢铁、机电、汽修、医疗、餐饮及科研院所等多领域、多部门，涉及废气、废水、土壤、 饮食业油烟等多个监测项目，违法所得76万余元。 人民法院经审理，以提供虚假证明文件罪对该公司和责任人员一并定罪判刑，判决某检测公司犯提供 虚假证明文件罪，判处罚金20万元；石某涛等6人犯提供虚假证明文件罪，分别判处有期徒刑一年二 个月至九个月不等，并禁止自刑罚执行完毕之日起三年内从事环境监测及相关职业。一审判决已生 效。 最高法在阐述上述案例典型意义时指出，人民法院依法惩处被告单位及相关责任人，并对实施数据造 假的相关人员采取行业禁入措施，对其他环境监测机构和相关从业人员起到强有力的警示作用。同 时，人民法院结合案件审理过程中发现的第三方环保服务机构经营乱象，向行政主管机关发出司法建 议，助力生态环境综合治理。 2025.06. 05 本文字数：1243，阅读时长大约2分钟 作者 | 第一财经 安然然 2025年6月5日是第54个世界环境日。今日，最高人民法院发布《中国环境资源审判（2024）》及 2024年度人民法院环境资源审判典 ...

Core Viewpoint - The People's Court is committed to strictly cracking down on illegal activities by third-party environmental service agencies, with ongoing special rectification efforts in collaboration with ecological and environmental departments [1][2]. Group 1: Legal Actions and Penalties - A case involving a testing company that provided false environmental monitoring reports was highlighted, with 222 fraudulent reports issued between March 2021 and October 2023, resulting in illegal gains of over 760,000 yuan [1]. - The court sentenced the testing company to a fine of 200,000 yuan and imposed prison terms ranging from nine months to one year and two months on six individuals involved, along with a three-year ban from engaging in environmental monitoring after serving their sentences [2]. Group 2: Judicial Recommendations and Measures - The Supreme Court emphasized the importance of punishing the defendants and implementing industry bans as a warning to other environmental monitoring institutions and professionals [2]. - The People's Court has issued judicial recommendations to administrative authorities to assist in comprehensive ecological and environmental governance, addressing the chaotic operations of third-party environmental service agencies [2]. Group 3: Specialized Environmental Resource Trials - By the end of 2024, 2,424 specialized environmental resource trial institutions had been established across the country, with over 6,700 judges and 9,400 auxiliary personnel dedicated to environmental resource trials [3]. - In 2024, the People's Court concluded 219,276 first-instance environmental resource cases, including 25,811 criminal cases and 151,256 civil cases, with a significant increase of 87.5% in ecological damage compensation amounting to 9.6 billion yuan [3].

Group 1 - The Supreme Court's annual report indicates that in 2024, courts adjudicated 219,000 environmental resource cases, including 26,000 criminal cases related to environmental pollution and ecological damage [1][2] - The report emphasizes the enforcement of environmental protection laws, with over 4,900 cases related to pollution adjudicated, supporting the ongoing battle against pollution [2] - The establishment of specialized environmental resource courts has increased, with 2,424 such courts set up nationwide, employing over 16,000 judges and judicial assistants [3] Group 2 - The report highlights the judicial efforts to support the "dual carbon" goals, including the establishment of a climate change judicial response research center [2][3] - It details the judicial handling of ecological damage compensation, with 246 cases adjudicated and a total compensation amounting to 9.6 billion yuan, reflecting a year-on-year increase of 87.5% [1] - The Supreme Court is actively involved in legislative support for ecological environment laws and has published numerous typical cases to guide judicial practices [3]

Core Insights - The Supreme People's Court reported a decline in environmental resource cases, with over 245,000 cases accepted and approximately 219,000 concluded in 2024, marking a continuous three-year decrease [1][3] Group 1: Environmental Resource Cases - In 2024, the courts accepted over 28,000 criminal cases related to environmental resources and concluded nearly 26,000, emphasizing the enforcement of criminal policies against environmental crimes [3][4] - The civil cases related to environmental resources saw over 167,000 accepted and about 151,000 concluded, highlighting the principle of full compensation for environmental damage [3][4] - Administrative cases numbered around 50,000 accepted and over 42,000 concluded, showcasing the courts' role in supervising administrative compliance [3][4] Group 2: Environmental Protection and Judicial Measures - The courts concluded over 4,900 cases related to pollution and ecological damage, reinforcing judicial support for pollution prevention efforts [4] - A total of 6,040 cases involving illegal mining and utility contracts were adjudicated, reflecting a comprehensive approach to environmental and resource management [4] - The courts processed 26,000 cases related to deforestation and ecological destruction, demonstrating a commitment to maintaining ecosystem diversity and stability [4] Group 3: Specialized Environmental Judicial Institutions - By the end of 2024, 2,424 specialized environmental resource courts were established, with over 16,000 judges and judicial assistants dedicated to these cases [5] - The establishment of over 1,000 comprehensive ecological judicial protection bases aims to enhance systemic protection levels [5] - Collaborative efforts with various governmental bodies are underway to reform ecological damage compensation systems, providing policy guidance for judicial practices [5]

Core Viewpoint - The compilation of the Ecological Environment Code in China has made significant progress, with the draft submitted for the first review by the National People's Congress, consisting of 1188 articles divided into five sections, addressing various aspects of ecological protection and legal responsibilities [1][2][3]. Summary by Relevant Sections Compilation Structure - The Ecological Environment Code draft includes five sections: General Principles, Pollution Prevention, Ecological Protection, Green Low-Carbon Development, and Legal Responsibilities and Supplementary Provisions, aiming for a comprehensive legal framework [1][2]. - The draft emphasizes a systematic protection approach, integrating existing laws and focusing on green low-carbon development and ecological sustainability [2][4]. Legal Integration and Innovation - The compilation adopts a moderate codification model, systematically integrating over 30 existing ecological environment laws, enhancing the overall coherence and effectiveness of the legal framework [4][5]. - The draft addresses legal gaps related to climate change, carbon neutrality, and green development, establishing guiding principles that reflect contemporary and forward-looking legal needs [3][5]. Relationship with Other Legal Frameworks - The Ecological Environment Code is positioned as the second codified law in China, complementing the Civil Code, with both laws sharing a common goal of promoting sustainable development and ecological protection [6][7]. - While the Civil Code focuses on relationships between individuals, the Ecological Environment Code emphasizes the relationship between humans and nature, aiming for comprehensive environmental protection through various regulatory mechanisms [7]. Judicial Recommendations - The "Rule of Law Blue Book" suggests using the compilation of the Ecological Environment Code as an opportunity to establish a centralized jurisdiction system for environmental resource trials across administrative regions, addressing current legal inconsistencies [8][10]. - The proposal includes creating specialized environmental trial institutions based on ecological zones, enhancing the efficiency and effectiveness of environmental justice [11].