自2016年以来，阿坝州环境资源审判机构审理各类环境资源案件1046件。（记者 徐中成） 为打造环境资源审判工作共识圈、司法审判保障圈、半小时纠纷解决圈、机制建设全域共建圈，阿 坝州法院系统按40-50公里左右距离均衡设立环境资源审判庭或旅游环保法庭，实现高速公路沿线半小 时纠纷解决司法服务圈；针对道路较远、条件不具备的地方，辅以巡回审判车加以保障，确保当事人发 生纠纷后1小时左右能找到法官；成立摩托车宣讲队等，开展环境法治进校园、进工厂、进景区活动； 会同检察、公安、生态环境等部门建立补植复绿基地，运用替代性修复、补种复绿等方式依法促使责任 人最大限度恢复生态环境；聘请8名环境法学专家当顾问，会诊把脉全州法院环境资源审判工作。 阿坝州还发布涉及生态环境资源的十大典型案件，包括盗伐林木、非法采伐国家重点保护植物、非 法猎捕珍贵濒危野生动物等，多名涉案人员被处罚，并要求恢复被破坏的林地或承担修复费用。 "凡盗伐树木，必须依法严惩。"5月27日，在松潘县人民法院环境资源庭，一村民因盗伐5棵树木被 提起诉讼。该院院长毛辉介绍，"此案将于下月初开庭审判。" 依托13个基层法院环境资源庭（团队）和已建的56个人民法庭、 ...

近日，嘉荫县人民法院打破传统普法模式，依靠黑龙江茅兰沟国家级自然保护区管理局建立环境资源审 判宣传教育基地，围绕生态修复示范、生态保护案例等实践形式，将法治课堂搬到绿水青山间，这种创 新的"体验式+场景式"普法模式，让受邀学生在真实环境中感受生态法治的重要性。 环境资源审判宣传教育基地，是大力推进本地区环境资源司法实践的有益尝试，旨在打造"龙境沃壤， 嘉法护航"环资品牌，集案件展示、理论调研、队伍建设、普法宣传于一体的综合性基地。同时也标志 着嘉荫县人民法院在提升全社会生态环境保护法治意识，积极推动生态环境法律适用规则体系化，开启 环境资源审判工作的新征程。 （来源：黑龙江日报） 转自：黑龙江日报 （邹佳鑫） ...

立足审判职能，参与社会治理。针对案件审理中发现的问题，及时制发司法建议，督促相关单位完善制 度、整改落实。开展法律"七进"活动8次，推动形成人人参与环境保护的社会治理新格局。 （李超 王芊硕） 严格依法裁判，守护司法公正。坚持罪刑法定原则，严把案件事实关、证据关、法律适用关，做到精准 定罪量刑、依法从严惩处，在维护司法权威的同时充分保障当事人诉讼权利，年初以来，审理非法狩 猎、非法捕捞罪案件5件，判处罪犯6人。 强化部门协作，凝聚保护合力。主动加强与相关职能部门沟通协作，召开联席会议2次，建立生态环境 保护机制2个，通过常态化信息沟通、监督配合，形成全链条工作格局，凝聚起守护绿水青山强大合 力。 （来源：黑龙江日报） 转自：黑龙江日报 "三年强院行动"开展以来，克东县人民法院将环境资源审判工作作为守护生态环境的关键防线，积极探 索案件审理机制，严厉打击破坏环境违法犯罪行为，以高质量司法服务为辖区生态环境保护筑牢法治屏 障。 ...

Core Insights - The Beijing Fourth Intermediate People's Court has reported significant achievements in environmental resource trials over the past decade, particularly in promoting ecological restoration through civil public interest litigation [1][2] - Since 2015, the court has concluded 56 environmental resource civil public interest litigation cases, with over 30% resolved through mediation or withdrawal, indicating a shift towards diversified and flexible civil liability approaches [1] Group 1: Achievements and Practices - The court has adhered to the principles of damage responsibility and comprehensive compensation, encouraging joint tortfeasors to fulfill overall restoration obligations when individual actions do not account for total damage [1] - The court has implemented targeted mediation to encourage polluting enterprises to take responsibility for environmental remediation, and has explored preventive judgments to halt pollution before it occurs [2] - The court has developed a public experience enhancement model tailored to Beijing's characteristics for ecological restoration, ensuring comprehensive restoration of damaged ecosystems through flexible responsibility schemes [2] Group 2: Case Examples and Judicial Support - Six typical cases were presented, showcasing effective practices such as using alternative restoration measures like installing electric vehicle charging stations to offset damages caused by excessive emissions [2] - The court's efforts are aligned with the "Fengqiao Experience" of the new era, aiming to transform judicial outcomes into tangible ecological protection results, thereby providing judicial support for building a harmonious and livable city in Beijing [2]

Group 1 - The meeting focused on strengthening the judicial protection of ecological environment in the Yellow River Basin, emphasizing collaboration between administrative enforcement and judicial departments [1] - Participants discussed the current status of ecological protection and restoration in Ningxia, the need to combat crimes in ecological resource sectors, and the importance of wildlife protection [1] - The meeting aimed to gather suggestions for building a comprehensive ecological environment protection framework through specific judicial protection case studies [1] Group 2 - The court is committed to enhancing the professionalization of environmental resource trials, optimizing the trial organization system, and providing specialized training for judges [2] - There is a focus on restorative judicial practices, exploring various responsibility-bearing methods such as replanting, increasing wildlife populations, and labor compensation [2] - The establishment of a cross-departmental communication and collaboration mechanism is emphasized to ensure effective information sharing and coordination between enforcement and judicial processes [2]

Core Viewpoint - The Yanqing District People's Court in Beijing has been actively involved in environmental resource trials since the establishment of its environmental protection tribunal in 2010, emphasizing the balance between ecological protection and community rights [1] Group 1: Environmental Resource Cases - From January 2023 to June 2025, the court has accepted a total of 85 environmental resource cases, covering criminal, civil, administrative, and enforcement areas [1] - In civil cases, the court prioritizes mediation while combining it with adjudication to balance neighbor rights and ecological protection, clarifying the legal boundaries for land and water use [1] Group 2: Execution and Restoration - The court has developed a "specialized execution + diversified restoration" system in enforcement cases, exploring various restoration methods such as species replenishment and carbon sink compensation to effectively restore damaged ecological environments [1] Group 3: Typical Cases - The court has released typical cases, including the largest illegal fishing case in Beijing, illegal hunting of wildlife, administrative non-litigation enforcement review of the Great Wall protection, and forced execution of land recovery [1] - These cases reflect a dual approach of strict punishment for ecological damage and innovative exploration of ecological restoration, showcasing the court's judicial philosophy of balancing punishment and restoration, as well as protection and development [1]

Core Points - The establishment of the Henan Yellow River Basin Environmental Resource Ninth Circuit Court marks the full coverage of circuit courts along the Yellow River in Henan Province [1] - The circuit courts aim to address the challenges of large geographical spans and long distances for parties involved in environmental resource cases along the Yellow River [1] - Since the establishment of the circuit courts, nearly 700 cases have been mediated or adjudicated, enhancing local dispute resolution and environmental awareness [1][2] Group 1 - The circuit courts were set up to improve the management of environmental resource cases in the Yellow River Basin, facilitating local hearings and resolutions [1] - The courts have been established in historically significant and culturally rich locations, emphasizing the importance of environmental protection [1] - The initiative aims to educate the public on the concept of "environment has value, damage bears responsibility," thereby enhancing the effectiveness of environmental governance [1] Group 2 - The court's leadership emphasizes the commitment to the principle that "lucid waters and lush mountains are invaluable assets," aiming for systematic and comprehensive ecological protection [2] - There is a focus on innovative mechanisms in environmental resource adjudication and increasing public awareness of ecological and legal responsibilities [2] - The goal is to leverage legal power to safeguard the ecological environment of the Yellow River Basin [2]

Core Insights - In 2024, Chinese courts adjudicated 219,000 environmental resource cases, with compensation for ecological damage totaling 9.6 billion yuan, marking an 87.5% increase year-on-year [1] Group 1: Environmental Protection Enforcement - The Supreme Court revealed a case where four companies illegally mined resources under the guise of a wellness tourism project, resulting in significant geological damage and a loss of over 90 million yuan in mineral resources [2] - The Wuhan Intermediate Court imposed criminal liability on the companies for illegal mining and ordered them to pay over 12.9 million yuan for ecological service losses [2] - A detection company and its personnel were penalized for issuing 222 false environmental monitoring reports, leading to a fine of 200,000 yuan and prison sentences for responsible individuals [3] Group 2: Ecological Restoration and Preventive Measures - The Chongqing court executed a ruling to dismantle artificial fish nests in a critical spawning area to ensure ecological balance and protect fish populations [4] - The court mandated the construction of 1,961 square meters of artificial fish nests as a form of ecological restoration following illegal fishing activities [5] - A court in Huzhou issued a prohibition order to prevent activities threatening a newly discovered aquatic species, demonstrating proactive judicial measures for biodiversity protection [6] Group 3: Judicial Protection of Public Health - A pig farming cooperative was found responsible for polluting a drinking water source, affecting thousands of residents, leading to significant financial losses [7] - The Guang'an Intermediate Court ruled against the cooperative for environmental pollution, resulting in the dismantling of the pig farm and ongoing environmental restoration efforts [8] - The court provided judicial recommendations to local authorities to improve agricultural pollution management and prevent future incidents [9]

Core Viewpoint - The case highlights the illegal trade of endangered bird species in Ningxia, China, and emphasizes the need for stronger legal measures and ecological restoration efforts to protect wildlife and their habitats [1][2][4]. Group 1: Illegal Wildlife Trade - From 2021 to 2023, individuals engaged in the illegal acquisition and sale of wild birds and their eggs, including over 1,000 young birds and more than 6,000 eggs, some of which belonged to nationally protected species [1][2]. - The perpetrators used prohibited methods for hunting in restricted areas, leading to criminal charges against them for harming precious and endangered wildlife [2][4]. Group 2: Ecological Rescue Efforts - During the trial, one defendant continued illegal activities, resulting in the capture of over 2,800 heron eggs, which were found in poor conditions, leading to a coordinated rescue effort involving multiple agencies [3]. - A total of 86 million yuan was allocated for the rescue of the herons, and after four months of care, over 1,000 herons were successfully released back into the wild [3][4]. Group 3: Legal and Ecological Accountability - The court not only imposed criminal penalties but also required the defendants to compensate for ecological damage and the costs associated with the care of the birds, totaling over 1.9 million yuan [4]. - The case serves as a model for integrating legal accountability with ecological restoration efforts, showcasing a comprehensive approach to wildlife protection [4][6]. Group 4: Collaborative Environmental Protection - The court has initiated collaborations with various environmental and natural resource departments to create a framework for ecological protection and legal education [6]. - New regulations have been established to ensure that compensation for ecological damage can be used for wildlife rescue efforts, indicating a proactive approach to wildlife conservation [6].

Core Points - The Supreme People's Court reported that in 2024, a total of 219,000 environmental resource cases were adjudicated, including 4,168 environmental public interest litigation cases and 246 ecological damage compensation cases, with a total compensation amounting to 9.6 billion yuan [1] - The court emphasized strict enforcement of environmental protection laws and penalized over 4,900 cases related to environmental pollution, including criminal, civil, and administrative cases [1] - The establishment of 2,424 specialized environmental resource trial institutions and the involvement of over 16,000 judges and judicial assistants in environmental resource trials were highlighted, indicating a significant investment in judicial capacity [1] Summary by Category Environmental Litigation - In 2024, the courts concluded 4,168 environmental public interest lawsuits and 246 ecological damage compensation cases, with total compensation reaching 9.6 billion yuan [1] - The courts processed over 4,900 criminal, civil, and administrative cases related to environmental pollution [1] Judicial Capacity Building - By the end of 2024, 2,424 specialized environmental resource trial institutions were established, with more than 16,000 judges and judicial assistants dedicated to environmental resource trials [1] - Over 1,700 courts implemented specialized handling of environmental resource criminal, civil, and administrative cases [1] Collaborative Efforts - The courts are enhancing collaboration between administrative enforcement and judicial work, including a special campaign against fraudulent practices by third-party environmental service organizations [1] - More than 1,000 comprehensive ecological environment judicial protection (restoration) bases have been established to improve systemic protection levels [1]