王莽上台之后，由于他本性躁扰，不能无为，因而民多无所措手足。最为人所诟病的自然是王莽的经济 政策。王莽施行"土地国有"、"均产"和"废奴"政策。"今更名天下田曰王田，奴婢曰私属，皆不得买 卖。其男口不盈八，而田过一井者，分余田予九族邻里乡党。故无田，今当受田者，如制度。敢有非井 田圣制，无法惑众者，投诸四裔，以御魑魅。"此政策在当时就受到了质疑。中郎区博谏莽曰："井田虽 一 圣王法，其废久矣。周道既衰，而民不从。秦知顺民之心，可以获大利也，故灭庐井而置阡陌，遂王诸 夏，讫今海内未厌其敝。今欲违民心，追复千载绝迹，虽尧、舜复起，而无百年之渐，弗能行也。天下 初定，万民新附，诚未可施行。"此外，王莽还施行"五均六筦"制度。所谓六筦，是指对包括盐、铁、 酒、钱布铜冶、名山大泽及五均赊贷进行国家管制。王莽统治期间还多次进行币制改革，相继推出大泉 五十、契刀五百、一刀平五千，后又推行宝货制、货泉、货布。史载："是时百姓便安汉五铢钱，以莽 钱大小两行难知，又数变改不信，皆私以五铢钱市买。讹言大钱当罢，莫肯挟。莽患之，复下书：诸挟 五铢钱，言大钱当罢者，比非井田制，投四裔。于是农商失业，食货俱废，民人至涕泣于市道。" 王莽 ...

导语 不知道你有没有过这样的感觉——手机带来了很多便利，AI也越来越聪明，世界变得五花八门，可我 们却更忙、更焦虑，甚至有些迷失了，像是被某种看不见的节奏推着走，活得像系统里的一串数据。 十几岁，卷成绩；二十几岁，拼工作、找意义；三十多岁，背上房贷车贷，步步谨慎；四十来岁，又陷 进学区房、孩子功课、父母养老的巨大压力中……光是跟上这个时代，我们就已经用尽了力气。 北京大学姚洋教授在新书《活明白的学问》中，从经济与政治哲学的视角出发，为我们阐述了社会运转 背后的逻辑，理清了这个时代普通人所共有的困惑。 炒股就看金麒麟分析师研报，权威，专业，及时，全面，助您挖掘潜力主题机会！ 我们为什么会焦虑？焦虑背后，真正要解决的是什么？在今天的中国，我们又该如何从自身的文化中寻 找智慧，去追求一个更自由、公平、和谐的社会？ 来源：中信书院 1．价格和价值的背离是常态 中央财经大学 2024 年发布了一份人力资源报告。报告显示，在中国城市里，教育回报率在下降，男性 的教育回报率从以前每年多读一年书多赚 8.3%，到现在只多赚 5.7%；女性的教育回报率下降更多，从 10% 掉到了 6%。如此一来，同样一个人，他的劳动提供的价值 ...

2025年4月14日至15日，中共中央总书记、国家主席习近平对越南进行历史性国事访问。此访适逢中越 建交75周年暨"中越人文交流年"这一特殊年份，实现了新时代以来中越两党最高领导人第四轮互访，更 是今年中央周边工作会议后元首外交的首访首站，影响极为深远。作为亲历者，我想用三个关键词来概 括接待此访的感受。 第二个词是"实"。务实求真是整个访问的主基调，也是每个参与者的切实体会。两党总书记的战略共识 成为助推双边务实合作的强大引擎，访问期间中越创纪录签署了45份合作文件，涵盖经贸、互联互通、 人工智能、农业、文体、民生等领域。越共中央驻地一层的空旷廊厅被合作文件铺陈得满满当当，令在 场见证者倍感振奋。在同习近平总书记观看文件展陈时，苏林总书记不由赞叹双方成果之丰富。访问期 间，双方还一致决定将中越在全球首创的外交、国防、公安"3+3"战略对话机制升格为部长级，共同见 证中越铁路合作机制启动仪式。这一系列实打实、沉甸甸的成果，为两国铁路联通等战略合作按下"加 速键"，将双边务实合作提升至更高水平。 第三个词是"近"。中越因陆海相连而相近，更因以心相交而相亲。越方将接待习近平总书记、国家主席 此访视为全年最重要的外 ...

Group 1 - The People's Bank of China plans to issue a total of 1 ordinary commemorative coin and 1 commemorative banknote for the year 2026, along with additional coins celebrating Wuyi Mountain National Park and Chinese Peking Opera [1] - The issuance plan for precious metal commemorative coins includes 10 projects and 53 varieties for 2026, highlighting significant cultural and environmental themes [1] - The issuance plan is subject to adjustments based on the needs of promoting socialism, patriotism, and commemorating the achievements of China's economic and social development [1][2] Group 2 - Specific projects for the 2026 precious metal commemorative coins include the 2026 version of the Chinese Dragon silver coin, Wuyi Mountain National Park gold and silver coins, and the "Guarding the Earth Home" gold and silver coins [1][2] - The detailed specifications for the coins include various shapes, weights, and materials, such as the 31.104 grams for the Chinese Dragon silver coin and 3 grams for the Wuyi Mountain gold coin [3][5] - The 2027 series will also feature a panda precious metal commemorative coin and a coin for the Year of the Sheep, with multiple weight options ranging from 1 kilogram to 3 grams [6]

Core Insights - The report argues that regardless of whether AI represents a true technological revolution, it will inevitably exacerbate the inherent contradictions of the current U.S. capitalist framework, potentially leading to either a short-term financial crisis or a long-term deflationary environment with intensified social conflicts [3] - The technological revolution is characterized as a deflationary process, where capital seeks profit through innovation, but the macroeconomic outcome of innovation diffusion results in declining profit margins, creating a paradox between micro rationality and macro outcomes [3][4] - The impact of technological advancements on demand is uncertain, with the net effect of technological progress on employment being a complex interplay of substitution, restoration, and enhancement effects [3][13] - The current AI revolution is showing a suppressive effect on demand, contrasting with the previous internet revolution that boosted labor shares; the AI revolution is characterized by stronger substitution effects and delayed restoration effects [3][11] - The systemic challenges faced by the U.S. in developing AI stem from a fragile "impossible trinity" that requires lower interest rates, larger fiscal stimuli, and a stable dollar credit system to work in tandem [3][12] Theoretical Framework: Capitalist Perspective on Technological Revolution - The essence of technological revolution is driven by capital's pursuit of profit, where firms innovate to lower costs and achieve excess profits, but competition leads to overall industry productivity increases, resulting in declining profit margins [9][10] - The relationship between the organic composition of capital and profit margins is negatively correlated, confirming Marx's view that an increase in the organic composition of capital generally leads to a decline in profit margins [9][10] Historical Validation: Unique Path of U.S. Technological Revolution - The period from 1947 to 1987 was characterized by a balance between substitution and restoration effects, maintaining stable labor shares and wage growth in line with productivity [23][24] - In contrast, from 1987 to 2017, the acceleration of automation and a slowdown in the creation of new tasks led to a decline in labor shares and a decoupling of wage growth from productivity [30][31] Current Application: Is AI a True Technological Revolution? - The report questions whether the current AI investments can replicate the labor demand dynamics seen during the internet revolution, highlighting that the AI sector's growth may not translate into broad-based labor demand increases [76][80] - The potential for AI to create new tasks is limited by the current pace of technological maturity and market demand, leading to a scenario where the substitution effect may dominate, resulting in sustained pressure on labor demand [90][91] Future Projections: Two Scenarios Under AI - If AI is not a true revolution, it may lead to a narrative collapse and a potential market bubble burst, with significant risks of recession as market confidence wanes [88] - Conversely, if AI is a genuine revolution, it could exacerbate existing contradictions and lead to long-term deflation, as the disparity between capital gains and labor income widens, resulting in insufficient demand to match production capacity [90][91]

Core Points - North Korea held a grand military parade on October 10 to celebrate the 80th anniversary of the Workers' Party of Korea [1][4] - Kim Jong-un, the General Secretary of the Workers' Party, delivered a speech during the parade, attended by various international dignitaries [3][4] Summary by Sections Celebration Events - The 80th anniversary celebration of the Workers' Party took place at the May Day Stadium in Pyongyang on October 9, with Kim Jong-un delivering a commemorative speech [4] - A large group performance and cultural event were also held on the evening of October 9 [4] Key Messages from Kim Jong-un - Kim Jong-un highlighted the party's history and its role in leading social transformations, emphasizing the establishment of a true people's state and the realization of socialist ideals [4] - He stated that the Workers' Party has maintained its commitment to autonomy and socialism despite severe adversities, enhancing North Korea's international standing as a stronghold of justice [4] - Kim called for efforts to build a more prosperous and beautiful socialist paradise in North Korea alongside the people [4]

Core Insights - The article discusses the failures of capitalism in the United States, particularly highlighting the widening income and wealth gaps that have accelerated during the pandemic and post-pandemic era [1][2][5][15]. Economic Disparities - The article presents data showing that the real income of the bottom 60% of workers has stagnated since 1980, while the top 10% and 1% have seen their incomes double [19][21][28]. - The wealth gap is at its highest level since the late 1930s, with the top 1% holding more wealth than the bottom 90% combined [25][31]. - The likelihood of children earning more than their parents has dropped from 90% in 1970 to 50% today, indicating reduced economic mobility [23][38]. Education and Opportunity - The article emphasizes the importance of equal educational opportunities, noting that children from low-income families face significant disadvantages, including higher rates of poverty and food insecurity [44][45][46]. - The U.S. education system ranks poorly in standardized tests compared to other developed countries, particularly affecting students from high-poverty schools [48][49][52]. - There is a significant disparity in funding between public schools in wealthy and poor communities, exacerbating educational inequalities [68][70]. Social and Economic Consequences - The article argues that the widening income and wealth gaps lead to social unrest and political polarization, with rising populism on both the left and right [97][104][105]. - The increasing incarceration rates and their correlation with educational attainment highlight the systemic issues affecting low-income families [82][84][85]. - Health outcomes are also negatively impacted, with lower-income individuals experiencing higher rates of premature death and poorer health [88][89][91]. Recommendations for Reform - The article suggests that reforms are necessary to address the failures of capitalism, including the need for strong leadership to tackle income and wealth disparities [136][137]. - It advocates for bipartisan cooperation to redesign the economic system, focusing on equitable resource distribution and improving productivity [138][139]. - The establishment of clear metrics for success and accountability in addressing these issues is emphasized as crucial for effective reform [140][141].

Group 1 - Wang Yi emphasized the importance of maintaining and developing China-North Korea relations as a strategic priority for the Chinese government, highlighting the historical friendship between the two countries [1] - The recent meeting between Xi Jinping and Kim Jong-un provided a clear direction and blueprint for the development of China-North Korea relations, with a focus on enhancing strategic communication and cooperation [1] - Both countries share common ideals and goals as socialist states, which can facilitate the exchange of governance experiences to support their respective socialist developments [1] Group 2 - Wang Yi noted the current international situation is complex, with power politics posing significant threats, and expressed appreciation for North Korea's support of China's core interests and initiatives [2] - North Korea's Foreign Minister Choe Son-hui acknowledged China's historical achievements and international status, emphasizing the importance of deepening China-North Korea relations [3] - Choe expressed North Korea's commitment to implementing the consensus reached by the highest leaders of both parties and enhancing practical cooperation to elevate bilateral relations [3] Group 3 - Choe Son-hui's visit marks her first solo trip to China since becoming Foreign Minister in June 2022, indicating a significant diplomatic engagement between the two nations [4] - The discussions are expected to focus on the implementation of outcomes from the recent summit between the leaders of China and North Korea, as well as strategies to address regional issues [4] - The timing of Choe's visit coincides with recent diplomatic activities involving South Korea, highlighting the dynamic nature of regional diplomatic relations [4]

Core Points - The article reflects on the author's lifelong commitment to writing and learning, emphasizing the importance of perseverance and hard work in achieving success [1][3][10] - It highlights the author's journey from childhood aspirations to becoming a published author, with significant works like "Youth Forever" and its enduring impact over decades [4][5][6] Group 1: Personal Journey and Achievements - The author began writing at a young age, inspired by family and literature, and aimed to become a "professional revolutionary" [2][3] - "Youth Forever" was completed after years of effort and was finally published in 1979, marking a significant milestone in the author's literary career [4][6] - The book has seen multiple editions and translations, indicating its lasting popularity and relevance [5][6] Group 2: Philosophy on Learning and Health - The author emphasizes the value of continuous learning and adaptation, stating that knowledge enhances confidence and resilience [8][9] - Physical health is also highlighted as crucial for sustaining a productive life, with the author maintaining a rigorous exercise routine for decades [9][10] - The article advocates against complacency, encouraging a proactive approach to life and learning, and dismissing the notion of "lying flat" as a response to challenges [10]

Core Argument - The article argues that the true victors of World War II were the Soviet Union and the Chinese people, who made significant sacrifices, contrary to the narrative that emphasizes the contributions of Western powers like the United States and the United Kingdom [2][8]. Group 1: Historical Context - The article asserts that the real beginning of World War II was marked by Japan's invasion of Northeast China in 1931, rather than Germany's invasion of Poland in 1939 [3][4]. - It highlights that while the Western powers were calculating their economic interests, the Soviet Union and China were engaged in a fierce struggle against fascism, with the Soviet Union rapidly industrializing in preparation for war [2][3][4]. Group 2: Economic and Military Contributions - The article presents data showing that in 1941, the United States controlled approximately 22% to 24% of global GDP, while the Soviet Union and China together accounted for only about 8% [21][23]. - It emphasizes that the Soviet Union allocated 28% of its GNP to military spending by 1941, while the United States maintained a relatively low military expenditure until the attack on Pearl Harbor [21][23][27]. Group 3: Casualties and Sacrifices - The article states that the total death toll from the war was approximately 82.62 million, with 62% of the casualties coming from socialist countries and colonies, while only 1% were from the United States and the United Kingdom [45][46][75]. - It details the staggering losses suffered by the Soviet Union, with around 27 million deaths, and China, which experienced at least 36 million deaths during the war [48][50][51]. Group 4: Misrepresentation of Contributions - The article argues that the narrative surrounding the war has often downplayed the contributions of the Soviet Union and China while exaggerating the roles of Western powers [2][8][82]. - It criticizes the Western powers for their delayed military engagement and prioritization of imperial interests over genuine anti-fascist efforts [21][22][27].