这是一场会被载入史册的行动。然而事实证明，这次行动所依赖的技术，或许与你点开的另一个浏览器 标签页中的技术如出一辙。 【文/艾略特·利维，翻译/鲸生】 今年1月，美军在加拉加斯采取行动。炸弹纷纷落向委内瑞拉首都，一种声波武器让马杜罗的卫兵们鼻 子鲜血直流，华盛顿多年来一直试图扳倒的尼古拉斯·马杜罗被掳走。 美国媒体报道称，Anthropic公司的人工智能模型Claude——平日里帮助数百万人起草电子邮件、归纳文 件内容和写代码的模型——已嵌入此次突袭行动的规划与执行流程，通过亚历山大·卡普的帕兰提尔 （Palantir）公司的工具运行——这家公司二十年来始终致力于将硅谷编织进美国的国防体系中。 对Claude模型而言，过去几周颇为忙碌：其不断改进的编程能力还被认为导致了美国软件股数万亿美元 的市值蒸发（被业内称为"软件服务末日论"，SaaSpocalypse）。Anthropic的管理层想必对这两件事的其 中一件感到非常高兴；至于另一件，则远没有那么高兴。过去几个月以来，Anthropic一直试图对其模 型应该如何使用保留一定的发言权。尽管据报道，该公司愿意放宽其使用限制，但它仍希望得到保证， 即Claude ...

作者虽说不否认市场的作用，但认为一些重要的市场不能只是交给市场去做，比如数据、人工智能和网络系统。作者认为这些 如同电力与铁路一样具有公共属性，需要国家的战略规划和国家力量去推进。 简而言之，作者主张美国科技企业更好地为其国家战略服务，强调"使命导向型创新"，而非只是关注短期回报和用户增长，"娱 乐至死"。 该书作者亚历山大.C.卡普(Alexander C.Karp)是美国一位数据分析公司的CEO，而该公司长期为美国政府、军方和情报机构提供 数据整合与分析系统，活跃于反恐和国家安全领域。卡普本人拥有哲学背景，思想上深受欧洲政治哲学传统影响，也非传统意 义的工程师企业家。另一位合著者尼古拉斯.W.扎米斯卡(Nicholas W.Zamiska)，是科技与政治经济领域的资深记者。作者们的经 历也部分解释了这本书的主要观点来源。 该书当然也招致了争议和批评。美国国内的一些批评者就认为，作者作为与美国政府关系密切的企业家，其观点可能带有利益 立场。 本书透露出的主要是一种焦虑，将此议题推至人们关注的镁光灯下，但在自由主义经济盛行多年的美国，书中一些主张的可实 践性存疑。 特约评论员夏宁 《科技共和国：硬实力、软信仰 ...

Core Argument - The book "The Technological Republic" discusses the strategic direction of the U.S. and the West for the coming decades, highlighting concerns over technological transformation and geopolitical competition [1][3]. Group 1: Critique of Current State - The author criticizes the U.S. elite's loss of direction in technology and innovation, stating that Silicon Valley has lost its way and that American technological innovation has become "hollowed out" over the past two decades [3][4]. - The book argues that the U.S. has failed to establish a clear collective identity or value system, leading to a crisis of purpose and direction among its elite [5][6]. - The author condemns the "technological neutrality" perspective, asserting that many talented individuals have moved away from critical areas that impact collective welfare and national defense [5][6]. Group 2: Structure of the Book - The book is divided into four parts: "The Software Century," "The Hollowing Out of the American Spirit," "Engineering Thinking," and "Rebuilding the Technological Republic," comprising 18 chapters [4][7]. - In "The Software Century," the author posits that the era of nuclear deterrence is ending, and a new deterrent age based on artificial intelligence is emerging, which will dominate future wars [4][7]. - The second part analyzes the cultural decline in the U.S. and the West, attributing it to internal crises of spirit and identity [5][6]. Group 3: Call for Action - The author emphasizes the need for Silicon Valley to engage with public service and national missions, arguing that technology should be a force for rebuilding collective beliefs and national direction [7][8]. - The book suggests that the U.S. must integrate "engineering thinking" into its governance to transition from the atomic age to the algorithmic age [7][8]. - The author calls for a re-establishment of national culture and values to foster collective identity and shared goals, warning against the current "innovation desert" in various sectors [7][8]. Group 4: Future Implications - The core argument throughout the book is that the software industry must rebuild its relationship with the government and redirect its resources towards developing technological and AI capabilities to address pressing national challenges [8][9]. - The author posits that the future global competition will center on institutional, technological, and national will, rather than mere market competition [9][10]. - The book provides insights into understanding the evolution of global power dynamics over the next twenty years, emphasizing that AI will reshape industry landscapes and international order [9][10].

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the launch of the "Genesis Mission," a national AI development plan initiated by President Trump, which aims to elevate AI technology to a core national strategy, marking a significant shift in the U.S. approach to technology and governance [1]. Group 1: Key Players and Influences - The driving force behind Trump's administration includes a group of Silicon Valley tech elites such as Peter Thiel, Elon Musk, and David Sacks, who advocate for a "tech accelerationism" philosophy that seeks to reshape government through engineering thinking [2][5]. - Trump's political evolution is highlighted by a shift in funding sources, with small donations decreasing from 69% in 2016 to 32.9% in 2024, indicating a growing reliance on Silicon Valley capital [4]. Group 2: Technological Ideologies - The rise of "tech accelerationism" in Silicon Valley is changing the macro-political landscape in the U.S., advocating for rapid technological advancement as a means to drive social and political change [12][13]. - This ideology promotes the idea that technological progress, particularly in AI, is essential for solving long-standing societal issues, suggesting that regulatory and ethical concerns should be set aside to facilitate innovation [16][18]. Group 3: Future Vision and Military Implications - Alexander Karp envisions a future where the U.S. is a "Republic" supported by hard technology, emphasizing the need for a government that operates with the efficiency of top tech companies [19][21]. - The article raises concerns about the reluctance of talented engineers to engage in military applications of AI, despite the necessity for the U.S. defense sector to adapt to new technological realities [22][24].