Workflow
稀土威胁论
icon
Search documents
从稀土元素到稀土合金,从稀土技术到稀土替代:被夸大的稀土威胁
Sou Hu Cai Jing· 2025-11-15 22:41
Core Viewpoint - The narrative of "rare earth threats" may be exaggerated, as China relies on imported rare earth alloys while the value of rare earth alloy exports from Europe and the US far exceeds that of imported rare earth elements [1][3][5] Group 1: Dependency Analysis - Foreign countries depend on China's rare earth elements, but China is more dependent on foreign rare earth alloys [3][5] - In 2022, the EU imported approximately $7.5 million worth of refined rare earth elements, with two-thirds coming from China, while the EU's imports of rare earth alloys exceeded $100 million, with only 30% sourced from China [5][7] - The US imported 90% of its rare earth elements from China in 2024, but the total value was only $25 million, while exporting $190 million worth of rare earth alloys to China [5][7] Group 2: Supply Chain Dynamics - China imports about $1.4 billion worth of rare earth alloys annually, while its exports of rare earth elements are only around $400 million [7][9] - The US has been rapidly integrating its rare earth supply chain, with USA Rare Earth acquiring UK-based LCM to enhance its supply chain capabilities [8][9] Group 3: Technological Advancements - Western countries are making significant advancements in rare earth refining and alternative technologies, aiming to break China's monopoly on refining 60%-90% of different rare earth elements by 2025 [16][19] - Innovations include bio-based extraction methods, advanced separation technologies, and recycling techniques, which are expected to enhance local processing capabilities and reduce reliance on Chinese supplies [16][19][21] Group 4: Historical Context and Future Implications - Historical attempts by China to use rare earths as a trade tool through export quotas led to short-term price spikes but ultimately resulted in decreased demand as Western industries sought alternatives [27][29] - The current landscape indicates that while China maintains an advantage in primary processing, it is losing ground in the more valuable downstream products like rare earth alloys and magnets [27][29]
果然不出所料:美国又准备对华加税!这次,中国没有退路
Sou Hu Cai Jing· 2025-11-04 18:36
Group 1 - The U.S. has not abandoned its trade war strategy, as evidenced by the recent resumption of investigations against China and threats of increased tariffs related to rare earth elements [1][3] - The U.S. Treasury Secretary criticized China's control over the rare earth market and indicated that the U.S. is preparing to raise tariffs if China continues to restrict rare earth exports [1][3] - Despite the recent trade discussions in Busan, the U.S. has shown a pattern of inconsistency and pressure tactics, revealing underlying anxieties in its trade negotiations [3][4] Group 2 - China currently holds approximately 60% of global rare earth mining and 90% of refining capacity, making it difficult for the U.S. to reduce its dependence on China in the short term [3] - The U.S. is attempting to form a "rare earth alliance" with countries like Japan and Thailand, but experts suggest it will take 5 to 10 years to establish a complete refining supply chain [3][4] - The U.S. Trade Representative announced ongoing investigations into the Phase One trade agreement, which could lead to the reactivation of Section 301 tariffs against China [6][8] Group 3 - The recent trade discussions resulted in a temporary agreement where China would pause new rare earth export controls, while the U.S. would suspend certain restrictions for a year [8][10] - Key issues remain unresolved, such as whether the U.S. will suspend the 24% tariffs on Chinese goods and the status of chip restrictions, which are critical to finalizing any trade agreement [8][10] - China is adopting a cautious approach in negotiations, emphasizing the need for clear execution mechanisms to avoid falling into a "commitment trap" due to the U.S.'s past inconsistencies [8][10] Group 4 - The U.S. is facing a strategic dilemma, as its tariff strategy appears to be losing effectiveness, leading to a defensive posture in trade negotiations [6][10] - The potential for renewed conflict remains, particularly if the U.S. perceives that China's rare earth export controls are not lifted as expected [10] - The ongoing competition between the U.S. and China indicates that the latter remains the U.S.'s primary strategic rival, necessitating a firm stance from China in future negotiations [10]