Workflow
网络黑灰产
icon
Search documents
网络黑灰产要升级治理策略 建立行业黑名单及信用惩戒机制
Nan Fang Du Shi Bao· 2025-07-25 10:47
Core Viewpoint - The issue of student information leakage is widespread across China, significantly affecting the normal lives of parents and students, and damaging the healthy ecology of the education industry [1][2]. Information Leakage Investigation - A survey revealed that parents, particularly those of middle school students, are receiving numerous harassment calls, with some reporting up to 20 calls in a single day due to leaked information [2]. - The investigation uncovered a black market for selling parents' information on social media platforms, indicating a systemic issue [2][5]. Legal Framework - The actions of educational institutions that collect and misuse personal information violate the Civil Code of the People's Republic of China, which protects individual privacy rights [2][3]. - The Personal Information Protection Law mandates that personal information must be collected lawfully and not excessively, with penalties for violations [3]. - Criminal liability may arise under Article 253 of the Criminal Law if institutions illegally obtain or sell personal information, leading to severe consequences [3]. Regulatory Actions - Authorities have urged schools in Guangzhou to conduct thorough checks on their information collection practices to ensure compliance with personal information protection laws [4]. - Platforms are enhancing their methods to identify and manage illegal content related to personal information sales [5]. Recommendations for Improvement - Experts suggest establishing a rapid reporting channel for educational harassment information and conducting special inspections of educational applications [6]. - There is a call for stronger source control by educational departments and regular internal audits to prevent information leaks [6][7]. Industry Accountability - The establishment of an industry blacklist and credit punishment mechanism is deemed necessary to deter the misuse of personal information by educational institutions [8]. - A combination of legal penalties and a public blacklist could create a comprehensive governance system that discourages violations and promotes compliance [8][9].
抢票软件被判不正当竞争,具有示范意义
Qi Lu Wan Bao Wang· 2025-04-28 14:34
从市场竞争视角分析,郑某忠的行为对公平竞争环境造成了极大破坏。票务平台在运营过程中,投入了 大量人力、物力和财力,精心构建稳定且公平的购票系统,秉持先到先得的原则为消费者提供服务。而 抢票软件的出现,打破了这种公平局面。使用该软件的用户借此获得不正当的抢票优势,致使那些遵守 规则、通过正常途径购票的消费者处于明显劣势,极大地损害了他们的权益。而且,抢票软件还极大增 加了票务平台的运营成本。大量远超正常人为操作频率的下单请求涌入,导致平台系统负载剧增,响应 速度迟缓,甚至存在系统崩溃的风险。这不仅干扰了平台的正常运转,还降低了平台为其他用户提供服 务的质量,严重损害了平台的经营效益和商业信誉。 近日,最高人民法院发布了一起"抢票软件不正当竞争"的典型案例,引发关注。该案原告是一家知名娱 乐票务代理公司,涉及的门票销售几乎涵盖了现场娱乐的所有领域。而被告郑某忠在某二手购物平台, 售卖针对原告App的抢票"外挂"软件。 作为全国首例判定抢票软件构成不正当竞争的案例,本案引发了高度关注,其影响深远,为维护健康的 购票秩序与市场竞争环境提供了指引。 维护公平有序的购票秩序,需要多方协同努力。相关部门应强化监管力度,加大 ...