诺姆补充说，还将通过增配更多技术设备、摄像头及传感器对边境墙进行升级改造。她认为这一改变将 有助于劝阻非法移民入境美国。 美国在历史上因大量移民的涌入而获得发展。然而如今，非法移民问题在美国持续发酵，引发美国新的 种族歧视与身份认同撕裂。美国民主、共和两党均迎合不同阶层选民群体诉求大打"移民政策牌"，提出 的政策主张充满政治算计，难以切实执行。移民问题加剧社会矛盾的一大原因在于，在政治极化和贫富 分化加剧背景下，普通民众生活愈加艰难，"非法移民冲击美国社会"的说法被渲染，新移民成为美国内 部矛盾的"替罪羊"。 "现在，大家看看我身后的建筑结构，它很高，攀爬起来非常非常困难，几乎不可能翻越。它还深入地 下，如果要从下面挖掘（通道），同样非常困难，甚至不可能。"诺姆在新墨西哥州圣特雷莎举行的新 闻发布会上说，"今天，应特朗普总统特别要求，我们还将把墙体涂成黑色，他明白在这里的高温下， 黑色表面会吸收更多热量，这会让攀爬变得更加困难。" 【环球网报道 记者 张倩】据美国《国会山报》《新闻周刊》等媒体报道，美国国土安全部长克丽丝蒂· 诺姆当地时间19日表示，美国总统特朗普希望将美墨边境墙涂成黑色，这样它在高温下会变得 ...

Core Viewpoint - The recent protests in Los Angeles, triggered by federal immigration enforcement actions, highlight deep-seated political divisions in the U.S. regarding immigration policy and state versus federal authority [1][2][3]. Group 1: Federal and State Tensions - The U.S. government deployed 4,000 National Guard soldiers and 700 Marines to Los Angeles, breaking a 60-year political norm of federal non-intervention in state law enforcement [2]. - The local government and California state officials strongly opposed this federal action, labeling it an abuse of power and an attempt to create chaos for political gain [4]. - A federal district judge ruled the deployment illegal, but the Ninth Circuit Court temporarily halted this ruling, allowing federal control to continue [4]. Group 2: Impact of Protests - The protests have resulted in an estimated $32 million in damages to the city of Los Angeles [1]. - Over two weeks of protests led to 575 arrests, including 62 minors, and escalated violence with federal agents using tear gas and rubber bullets against protesters [2]. - The protests in Los Angeles sparked similar demonstrations in cities across the U.S., including New York and Chicago, indicating a nationwide resonance with the issue [2]. Group 3: Immigration Policy Disparities - The conflict reflects a significant divide between the two major political parties in the U.S., with the Republican Party advocating for strict immigration enforcement and the Democratic Party pushing for more lenient policies [3][5]. - A survey indicated that 39% of respondents supported the protests, with a stark partisan divide: 70% of Democrats viewed the protests as a legitimate exercise of civil rights, while 86% of Republicans supported federal enforcement actions [5]. - The ongoing political polarization has led to legislative stagnation on immigration reform, with only four immigration-related bills passed in the last 30 years, none addressing core issues like the legalization of undocumented immigrants [8]. Group 4: Economic Implications - California's economy heavily relies on immigrant labor, with one-third of its workforce being immigrants and 40% of entrepreneurs born outside the U.S. [4][7]. - The economic dependence on undocumented workers is evident in sectors like agriculture and construction, where illegal immigrants make up 15% to 20% of the workforce [7]. - The inability to enact comprehensive immigration reform exacerbates social and economic issues in the U.S., as the immigration debate becomes increasingly politicized [8].

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the escalating tensions in Los Angeles due to the Trump administration's immigration policies, highlighting the conflict between federal and state authorities, and the potential implications for American society and politics [1][28][38]. Group 1: Immigration Policies and Protests - The recent arrests of illegal immigrants in Los Angeles have sparked significant protests, with many residents expressing their anger against the federal government's actions [13][19]. - Trump's administration has a history of strict immigration policies, having deported approximately 935,000 illegal immigrants during his previous term [15]. - The protests reflect broader societal discontent with Trump's extreme policies, particularly in a state like California, where a significant portion of the population consists of immigrants or their descendants [29][40]. Group 2: Federal and State Tensions - The conflict has escalated to a point where Trump deployed the National Guard to Los Angeles without the consent of California's governor, marking a rare instance of federal intervention in state matters [21][23]. - California's governor, Gavin Newsom, has publicly criticized Trump's actions and threatened legal action against the federal government, indicating a deepening rift between state and federal authorities [30][34]. - The situation in Los Angeles is seen as a manifestation of the growing divide between the federal government and local jurisdictions, particularly in a state that has historically leaned Democratic [28][34]. Group 3: Broader Implications - The unrest in Los Angeles is viewed as a potential precursor to larger-scale civil conflict in the U.S., reflecting the increasing polarization within American society [42][44]. - The article suggests that the current turmoil may undermine the perception of the U.S. as a stable global leader, drawing parallels to previous incidents of civil unrest [44][46]. - The ongoing tensions highlight the challenges facing the Trump administration as it navigates complex social and political landscapes, with implications for future governance and public sentiment [38][46].

Core Viewpoint - The conflict between President Trump and California Governor Gavin Newsom escalates over immigration enforcement, leading to a significant confrontation between state and federal authorities [2][4][6]. Group 1: Conflict Overview - The Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) conducted a large-scale operation in Southern California, affecting both legal and illegal immigrants, which prompted protests and a response from Trump to deploy National Guard troops [2][4]. - Newsom criticized Trump's handling of the situation, asserting that the federal government exacerbated the unrest and that the deployment of troops would only heighten tensions [4][7]. Group 2: Political Dynamics - The ongoing tension reflects a broader ideological divide, with California being a Democratic stronghold that opposes Trump's immigration policies, which have historically targeted illegal immigrants [7][8]. - California's legislative actions, such as the "sanctuary state" law, demonstrate its resistance to federal immigration enforcement, further complicating the relationship with the Trump administration [7][8]. Group 3: Financial Implications - Trump's tariffs have reportedly cost California $40 billion, leading Newsom to file a lawsuit against Trump, highlighting the financial stakes involved in the political conflict [8][9]. - The federal government relies on California for a significant portion of its revenue, and Newsom's potential refusal to comply with federal funding cuts could have substantial fiscal implications [8][9]. Group 4: Historical Context - The current situation mirrors past conflicts, such as the Texas confrontation with the federal government over immigration, indicating a pattern of state-federal tensions that could lead to further political fragmentation [13][16]. - The notion of state independence or secession has been discussed in the context of these conflicts, reflecting deepening divisions within the United States [9][17].

Core Viewpoint - The ongoing conflict in Los Angeles regarding illegal immigration enforcement is escalating, with significant protests against federal actions, highlighting deep societal divisions in the U.S. [2][3][8] Group 1: Conflict Escalation - Federal agencies, including ICE, have intensified raids on illegal immigrants, leading to public unrest and confrontations with local communities [3][4] - On June 6, federal agents conducted raids in at least seven locations in Los Angeles, resulting in 44 arrests, which sparked protests from local residents [3][4] - The deployment of 300 National Guard personnel by the military to Los Angeles aimed to control the protests, but the number of demonstrators grew from dozens to over 200 [3][4] Group 2: Political Responses - California Governor Gavin Newsom and Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass have called for peaceful protests, while President Trump criticized them for their inability to manage the situation [4][5] - Trump signed a memorandum to deploy 2,000 National Guard troops to Los Angeles without a request from the state governor, marking a significant shift in federal-state relations [4][5] - Legal experts noted that this is the first time since 1965 that a president has mobilized state National Guard without a governor's request [4] Group 3: Historical Context - The conflict in Los Angeles is seen as a culmination of ongoing tensions between California, a Democratic stronghold, and the federal government under Trump, which has historically opposed immigration [5][6] - California's long-standing tradition of supporting immigration contrasts sharply with the Trump administration's policies, leading to increased friction on various issues [5][6] Group 4: Societal Implications - The protests reflect a broader societal divide in the U.S., particularly regarding immigration policies, with significant implications for social cohesion [7][8] - The presence of Mexican flags among protesters indicates a strong cultural and political response to federal actions, emphasizing the need for comprehensive immigration reform [7][8] - Experts argue that Trump's aggressive immigration enforcement strategies are unlikely to change immigration trends and may exacerbate societal divisions [8]

Core Viewpoint - The U.S. Secretary of State, Marco Rubio, expresses a desire for more countries to accept immigrants expelled from the U.S. [1] Group 1 - The U.S. government is actively seeking international cooperation to manage immigration issues [1] - There is an emphasis on the need for a collaborative approach among nations regarding the acceptance of displaced individuals [1]