美国两党斗争

Search documents
50:45通过,特朗普爆粗口,美16州“造反”,憋6个月的拜登出山了
Sou Hu Cai Jing· 2025-08-03 22:30
鲍威尔才没有被开除,但是在特朗普的施压下,在2023年九月份被拜登任命的美联储理事会成员 库格勒在8月1日的时候正式提出了离职的申请。而特朗普 也兴奋的表示,他非常高兴可以任命新的美联储理事。 要知道美联储的理事们拥有投票决定央行的利率决策,以及银行法规和其他金融规则的修改的权利,目前特朗普成功地安排进去了两个,在7月30日的美联 储议会上就罕见出现了反对美联储的维持原有利率的投票结果。 自从特朗普上台之后,实现了3权归一的他,对外关税大棒想打谁就打谁,对内开始对民主党发起清洗,从拜登-奥巴马-碧昂丝-默多克的福克斯新闻,想弄 谁就弄谁?把嚣张两个字放在了脑门上。 而特朗普对民主党人的极限压迫,导致美国正在加速撕裂,毫不夸张地说在全美五十州,有十六个蓝色州在司法战场和特朗普开火,剩余的三十四个红蓝参 半州,天天在街头瞎混。 为了将所有民主党有关的人赶出,美国的政务系统,特朗普可以说是费劲的心思,在上任的半年里废除了特朗普时期的80多项禁令。后又撤出了拜登的安全 许可,禁止他接触任何国家机密,随后希拉里、哈里斯、布林肯也全部被撤销接触国家机密的特权。 而这根本就不够,由于对等关税,导致美国通胀加速增长,为了缓解 ...
特朗普栽了大跟头,美国“内战”打响,4年前的预言成真了
Sou Hu Cai Jing· 2025-06-10 12:47
Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the escalating tensions in Los Angeles due to the Trump administration's immigration policies, highlighting the conflict between federal and state authorities, and the potential implications for American society and politics [1][28][38]. Group 1: Immigration Policies and Protests - The recent arrests of illegal immigrants in Los Angeles have sparked significant protests, with many residents expressing their anger against the federal government's actions [13][19]. - Trump's administration has a history of strict immigration policies, having deported approximately 935,000 illegal immigrants during his previous term [15]. - The protests reflect broader societal discontent with Trump's extreme policies, particularly in a state like California, where a significant portion of the population consists of immigrants or their descendants [29][40]. Group 2: Federal and State Tensions - The conflict has escalated to a point where Trump deployed the National Guard to Los Angeles without the consent of California's governor, marking a rare instance of federal intervention in state matters [21][23]. - California's governor, Gavin Newsom, has publicly criticized Trump's actions and threatened legal action against the federal government, indicating a deepening rift between state and federal authorities [30][34]. - The situation in Los Angeles is seen as a manifestation of the growing divide between the federal government and local jurisdictions, particularly in a state that has historically leaned Democratic [28][34]. Group 3: Broader Implications - The unrest in Los Angeles is viewed as a potential precursor to larger-scale civil conflict in the U.S., reflecting the increasing polarization within American society [42][44]. - The article suggests that the current turmoil may undermine the perception of the U.S. as a stable global leader, drawing parallels to previous incidents of civil unrest [44][46]. - The ongoing tensions highlight the challenges facing the Trump administration as it navigates complex social and political landscapes, with implications for future governance and public sentiment [38][46].