中新网河南漯河1月8日电(韩章云 王佳宁)2025年度河南考古工作成果交流会8日在河南漯河举行。其 间，公布了中乌考古人员在乌兹别克斯坦库瓦古城遗址考古发现帕提亚时期至萨曼尼时期古城墙，使用 时间从公元前3世纪至公元10世纪。 库瓦古城遗址位于乌兹别克斯坦东部费尔干纳盆地，该地区是古丝绸之路的重要枢纽，与中国的历史渊 源可追溯至两千多年前，汉代张骞出使西域时记载的"大宛国"即位于此。 2023年，河南省洛阳市考古研究院同乌兹别克斯坦费尔干纳大学组成联合考古队，在库瓦古城遗址开展 联合考古勘探。 刘斌表示，此次考古发掘对库瓦古城主城北门区域地层堆积情况及城门整体结构、建筑选材、修筑技 艺、相对年代等形成了新的认识。 图为库瓦古城遗址。(无人机照片)洛阳市考古研究院 供图 图为库瓦 古城遗址的发掘区域。洛阳市考古研究院 供图 "发掘表明，库瓦古城北门区域堆积复杂，延续时间很长，且形制和功能做过多次改建，使用了泥坯和 泥砖两种不同的建筑材料。"刘斌表示，初步判断库瓦古城北门区域最早墙体为帕提亚时期，中间有大 宛、粟特时期墙体，最晚为萨曼尼时期，使用时间为公元前3世纪至公元10世纪。 刘斌介绍，联合考古队还对库瓦古城 ...

（来源：光明日报） 遗址内共发现早商文化遗存灰坑8个，出土的鬲、大口尊等器物时代特征鲜明。鬲折沿、束颈、腹 垂鼓、裆较高，尖锥状足，器身饰较细的竖向绳纹；大口尊口径明显大于肩颈。这些器物特征均属二里 岗下层文化偏晚阶段。 东周文化遗存发现于35座东周墓葬中。墓葬皆为中小型竖穴土坑墓，多呈两两成对分布。随葬品涵 盖鼎、豆、壶、鬲、盆等陶器，以及铜带钩、骨笄、铜镞等小件器物。器物特征反映墓地年代从春秋晚 期延续至战国中期。 近年来，在永济市境内发现多批仰韶、龙山、商代、东周等时期遗存，分布主要集中在伍姓湖西 侧、涑水河南北两岸的晓朝、七社、小张等一线。这表明，早在距今约7000年的仰韶早期，就有史前人 类在这片区域活动。 本报太原1月1日电（记者张楠、杨珏）近日，山西省考古研究院发布重要考古收获。山西永济七社遗址 发掘揭露2600平方米，发现一批仰韶中晚期、早商及东周等阶段遗存，为研究晋西南地区先秦时期文化 补充了实物资料。 专家指出，永济市境内已发掘的遗存中，仰韶中期、早商、东周时期遗存数量最多，堆积也较为丰 富。这揭示该区域可能是晋西南先秦时期人口活动的密集区之一。本次发掘为深化该区域相关研究补充 了新材料， ...

n a kia 12 22 (- T .. T L d 广州市东北郊的九龙湖，在中新广州知识城中心位置，是一座兼具蓄洪与生态功能的人工湖；湖中心一座覆有植被的山岗，体量庞大，这就是陂头岭遗址的 所在地。 广东省于2024年全面铺开第四次全国文物普查工作（下称"四普"），陂头岭遗址作为全国"三普"以来新发现的代表性文物线索之一，在"四普"中首次被登记 存档。 日前，记者跟随陂头岭遗址考古发掘领队、广州市文物考古研究院院长张强禄重访该遗址。张强禄指着湖心的小山岗对记者说："我们当年发掘时，曾站在 最高处环顾四周。北望可见凤凰山，南眺是帽峰山，这里是西北方向流溪河与东南方向增江流域之间的文化走廊。如今我们所在的九佛盆地，正是这条文化 走廊的核心地带，而陂头岭，可谓是核心中的核心。这一区位优势，在数千年前就注定为它赋予了特殊的历史使命与意义。" 他向记者讲述遗址的调查勘探和发掘始末，娓娓道来广州东北远郊南越先民的远古故事。 想为广州解开"谜团" 张强禄自1996年7月从北京大学考古学系毕业后，就来到广州市文物考古研究院工作，明年是他在广州考古工作的第30年。他始终在思考，为何秦定岭南 后，广州能成为岭南三郡之首"南海 ...

据《史记·赵世家》记载，战国时期赵国曾在附近修建要塞。遗址中发现大量战国晚期的瓦当、筒瓦， 其形制与赵都邯郸的构件相似，推测该区域此前可能存在大、中型建筑，佐证了遗址东南侧为广武城所 在地的可能性。 山西公布李家磨遗址发掘资料 或为史料记载广武城所在地 中新社太原12月16日电 (记者 胡健)山西省考古研究院16日对外公布忻州代县李家磨遗址发掘资料，遗 址主体年代约在西汉时期，或可早至战国晚期，其东南侧可能为史料中记载的广武城所在地。 李家磨遗址位于代县西南方，地处大同盆地与忻定盆地的通道上，背依恒山，东临滹沱河。为配合国道 改建工程建设，2023年4月至11月，山西省考古研究院、忻州市文物考古研究所、代县博物馆联合对遗 址进行考古发掘。此次清理出一处战国晚期至西汉时期的居址和四座清代墓葬。 发掘表明，该遗址仅发现有西汉时期的文化堆积，遗迹以灰坑为主，另有灰沟和道路。出土遗物以陶器 为主，包括罐、盆、豆、甑、鼎、钵等生活用器，以及大量瓦当、筒瓦等建筑构件。此外还有少量铁 器、铜器和骨蚌器。 据本次考古发掘项目领队贾尧介绍，遗址中出土的两件动物纹瓦当，说明此地可能受西边秦文化影响。 另一件"山"字纹铜镜残片，主 ...

Core Viewpoint - The discovery of a prehistoric burial site at the Luobi Cave site in Sanya, dating back approximately 13,000 to 12,000 years, represents the earliest burial site found in Hainan, providing significant insights into early human culture in the region [1][2] Group 1: Archaeological Findings - A prehistoric burial site was discovered, with the burial estimated to be around 13,000 to 12,000 years old, making it the earliest known burial site in Hainan [1] - The burial was of a juvenile individual, with a side-sitting burial style, and included woven shell ornaments found at the head and waist [1] - The Luobi Cave site has been under excavation since its discovery in 1983, with significant findings including human fossils, stone tools, and animal remains [1] Group 2: Academic Significance - Experts from various institutions highlighted the burial as the most definitive early burial style found in South China, emphasizing its importance for understanding prehistoric burial customs [2] - The woven shell ornaments found are noted as the earliest reported in China, providing valuable material for studying the prehistoric cultural practices of Hainan Island and its cultural exchanges with Southeast Asia [2] - Ongoing excavations will involve a multidisciplinary research team focusing on various scientific fields to comprehensively reveal the cultural significance of the Luobi Cave site [2]

Core Insights - The Sijiaoping site in Gansu Province has been recognized as one of the top ten archaeological discoveries in China for 2023, highlighting its significance in the field of archaeology [2]. Summary by Sections - **Location and Historical Context** - The Sijiaoping site is located 2.5 kilometers northeast of Lixian County in Longnan City, Gansu Province, and is a large ceremonial architectural complex from the Qin Dynasty [2]. - **Archaeological Findings** - This year marks the final year of field archaeology at the site, which has been under excavation for six years. The overall architectural layout of the site has been largely clarified [2]. - The site features a central square rammed earth platform of approximately 900 square meters, surrounded by three groups of parallel gate structures on each side, and L-shaped buildings at the corners, indicating a symmetrical architectural design [2]. - **Purpose of the Site** - Given its geographical location and architectural characteristics, the site is likely to have been a sacrificial venue prepared for Emperor Qin Shi Huang's western tours [2].

Core Viewpoint - The Liuli River site in Beijing's Fangshan District is the largest known Western Zhou period site in the Yanshan southern foothills, recognized for its extensive archaeological significance and rich cultural artifacts, including bronze, lacquer, jade, and pottery items. It has been selected as one of the top ten archaeological discoveries in China for 2024 [1][10]. Archaeological Discoveries - The site has undergone extensive excavations since its discovery in 1945, revealing a wealth of artifacts, including the renowned Jin Ding and Bo Ju Li from the Capital Museum [1]. - Recent excavations have confirmed the existence of an outer city wall and moat, expanding the site from less than 600,000 square meters to approximately 1,000,000 square meters, with 12-16 layers of deposits indicating the city's construction and abandonment timeline [2][5]. Historical Significance - The Liuli River site is pivotal in understanding Beijing's 3,000-year history of urban development, marking it as the earliest known urban civilization in the region [10]. - The discovery of inscriptions on bronze vessels has confirmed the site as the capital of the Yan state during the Western Zhou period, further solidifying its historical importance [4]. Multidisciplinary Collaboration - The recent archaeological efforts have involved collaboration among various institutions, employing advanced techniques such as carbon-14 dating, isotopic analysis, and organic residue analysis to enhance understanding of the site's historical context [5][6]. - The establishment of an archaeological geographic information system has allowed for detailed mapping and modeling of the site, showcasing the complexity of urban planning during the Western Zhou period [6]. Educational Initiatives - The Liuli River site has become a focal point for educational activities, including international field schools that engage students from various countries in archaeological practices, promoting cross-cultural understanding of archaeological methodologies [8]. - Public engagement initiatives have allowed families to experience archaeology firsthand, fostering a deeper appreciation for the site's historical and cultural significance [7]. Future Developments - Plans are underway to create an archaeological park at the Liuli River site, aimed at showcasing China's archaeological heritage and providing a space for public interaction with history [9].

Core Viewpoint - The Lianjiazhuang site in Shanxi Province has been excavated, revealing significant archaeological findings that contribute to understanding the cultural characteristics of the southeastern Jin region during the same period [3][7]. Group 1: Site Overview - The Lianjiazhuang site is located approximately 0.5 kilometers west of Lianjiazhuang Village in Qinxian County, Shanxi Province, covering an area of about 200,000 square meters [3]. - The site has been severely disturbed by agricultural activities and construction projects, with archaeological remains found primarily beneath the plow layer and no cultural accumulation layers identified [3]. Group 2: Archaeological Findings - The excavation revealed a single type of archaeological feature, specifically ash pits, with no direct stratigraphic relationships among the remains [5]. - The pottery discovered at the site predominantly consists of gray and brown pottery, with mud-gray pottery being the most common type [5]. - Decorative features on the artifacts include cord patterns, basket patterns, and additional raised patterns, with some vessel rims exhibiting a scalloped design [5]. - The main types of pottery include various jars and urns, with a smaller quantity of bowls, basins, and pointed-bottom bottles. Two distinct categories of urns and jars were identified based on their lip and rim characteristics [5]. Group 3: Cultural Significance - The Lianjiazhuang site shares geographical proximity and cultural similarities with the Dongcun site, reflecting both northern and southern regional influences while maintaining unique characteristics [7]. - The findings from the Lianjiazhuang excavation provide new data for further clarifying the cultural features of the southeastern Jin region and exploring interactions with other regions such as southwestern and central Jin [7].

Core Viewpoint - The Panlongcheng site in Hubei, recognized as one of the "Top Ten Archaeological Discoveries of 2024," provides unique evidence of the evolution of Chinese civilization through extensive archaeological efforts and technological advancements in cultural heritage preservation [8][10][18]. Archaeological Discoveries - The Panlongcheng site has yielded over 3,000 valuable artifacts, including bronze vessels and pottery, indicating its significance during the Shang Dynasty [9][18]. - Recent excavations have uncovered a large-scale stone structure at the Yangjiazui site, suggesting that Panlongcheng may have been a central city in the middle Yangtze River region during the Xia and Shang periods [11][18]. Historical Context - The site was first identified in 1954 when artifacts were discovered during flood prevention efforts, leading to a 70-year-long archaeological journey [10][11]. - The name "Panlongcheng" was officially adopted in 1964, following initial scientific excavations that confirmed its historical significance [10]. Preservation and Restoration Techniques - The site employs a combination of restoration techniques, including the use of glass fiber reinforced concrete and mud sculpture methods, to maintain the integrity of the artifacts and structures [13][14]. - A digital model of Panlongcheng has been created to enhance visitor experience through virtual reality technology [14]. Cultural and Educational Integration - The Panlongcheng Archaeological Park integrates cultural heritage preservation with tourism, offering interactive experiences and educational programs related to archaeology and ancient Chinese civilization [15][17]. - The park covers an area of 4.86 square kilometers, preserving the original environment while providing facilities for visitors [16]. Ongoing Research and Future Prospects - Current archaeological efforts focus on various sites within Panlongcheng, with a significant portion of the area still unexplored [17]. - The involvement of younger archaeologists is expected to lead to further discoveries and insights into the site's historical context [17].

Core Insights - The excavation of the Tang Dynasty tomb M5 in Pingyao County, Shanxi Province, reveals significant historical information about the burial practices and cultural artifacts of the early Tang period [1][3] - The tomb, dating back to the early Tang period, belonged to an individual from the Taiyuan Commandery and provides evidence for the location of the ancient Pingyao city during the Sui and Tang dynasties [3] Summary by Sections Excavation Details - The tomb M5 is located approximately 8.3 kilometers west of the ancient city of Pingyao and 8.6 kilometers north of the Zhen Guo Temple [1] - The tomb structure consists of a vertical pit with a single brick chamber, including a tomb passage, door, and chamber [1] Artifacts and Historical Context - A total of 13 burial items were unearthed, including pottery, bronze, and iron artifacts [3] - The tomb's owner was buried in the year 700 AD, providing a reference point for the early Tang period [3] - The findings indicate that early Tang tombs in Shanxi typically featured gray pottery and colorful glazed pottery, with a transition to white porcelain in the middle Tang period [3] Research Significance - The M5 tomb serves as a chronological marker for the transition between the early and middle Tang periods in Shanxi [3] - The burial structure and artifacts contribute valuable insights into the funerary customs and evolution of Tang Dynasty burial practices in the Jinzhong region and beyond [3]