Core Viewpoint - The article emphasizes the importance of deepening the integration of addressing both misconduct and corruption, highlighting their interrelated nature and the need for a comprehensive approach to governance and accountability [3][9][10]. Group 1: Understanding the Interconnection of Misconduct and Corruption - Misconduct and corruption are fundamentally interconnected, sharing common roots and often transforming into one another, necessitating a unified approach to tackle both issues effectively [3][7][10]. - The article discusses how minor misconduct can escalate into serious corruption, indicating that early intervention is crucial to prevent such transformations [3][5][7]. Group 2: Practical Requirements for Implementation - The article outlines the necessity of a systematic approach to integrate the concepts of addressing misconduct and corruption throughout all levels of governance, ensuring that both are treated with equal importance [4][11][12]. - It stresses the need for continuous monitoring and education to foster a culture of integrity and accountability within organizations [6][19]. Group 3: Effective Paths and Methods for Implementation - The article suggests employing targeted strategies to identify and address specific areas where misconduct and corruption are likely to intersect, thereby enhancing the effectiveness of governance measures [11][12][14]. - It advocates for a dual approach of investigating misconduct to uncover underlying corruption and vice versa, ensuring a comprehensive understanding of the issues at hand [11][14][18]. Group 4: Enhancing Governance and Accountability - The article highlights the importance of creating a cohesive framework that connects various supervisory and accountability mechanisms, ensuring that all efforts are aligned towards combating both misconduct and corruption [13][16][17]. - It emphasizes the need for ongoing education and awareness initiatives to reinforce the values of integrity and ethical behavior among all members of the organization [19].

Core Points - The article discusses the recent actions of Ukrainian President Zelensky, who signed a law that undermined the independence of key anti-corruption institutions, the National Anti-Corruption Bureau (NABU) and the Specialized Anti-Corruption Prosecutor's Office (SAPO), under the pretext of addressing "Russian interference" [1][12] - The move sparked significant protests within Ukraine and condemnation from the EU and international partners, leading to a rapid reversal by Zelensky, who proposed new legislation to restore the independence of these institutions within 72 hours [2][5][12] - The article highlights the ongoing issues of corruption in Ukraine, particularly within Zelensky's inner circle, and the challenges he faces in balancing domestic political pressures with international expectations for democratic governance [7][20][29] Group 1: Legislative Actions and Reactions - Zelensky's initial law aimed to place NABU and SAPO under the control of the Prosecutor General, which was met with immediate backlash from the public and international community [2][12] - Following the protests and threats of aid cuts from the EU, Zelensky quickly submitted a new law to restore the independence of these anti-corruption bodies, which was approved by parliament on July 31 [5][12][24] - The new legislation, while restoring some independence, still contains controversial provisions that suggest ongoing governmental influence over these institutions [21][22][23] Group 2: Corruption and Political Dynamics - Corruption has been a persistent issue in Ukraine, with high-profile figures, including members of Zelensky's administration, facing investigations for corrupt practices [7][11][28] - The article notes that Zelensky's government has been under scrutiny for its handling of corruption, particularly as investigations into his close associates have intensified [8][10][27] - The tension between maintaining democratic values and addressing the realities of wartime governance creates a complex political landscape for Zelensky, who must navigate both domestic and international pressures [15][29][30]

【文/观察者网专栏作者 安东·尼尔曼，翻译/ 薛凯桓】 在七国集团大使和欧盟表达了"严重关切"后，泽连斯基迅速做出让步，宣布已提交一份"非常平衡"的新法律草案，将恢复乌国家反腐败局（NABU）和特别 反腐败检察官办公室（SAPO）的独立性。 接着，7月22日，泽连斯基签署了第12414号法律。这份法律文件意味着反腐败机构将归属乌克兰总检察长管理。泽连斯基说，推动这个法律是为了让反腐官 员工作更简单，并摆脱俄罗斯的影响。 第二天（7月23日）上午，泽连斯基组织克拉夫琴科和执法及反腐机构的负责人开会。他要求反腐机构和检察机构"一起工作"，乌克兰安全局局长瓦西里·马 柳克也参加了会议。马柳克负责执行泽连斯基关于NABU和SAP的政策。他把泽连斯基接管反腐机构称为"清洗"，并认为这是好事。他说乌克兰安全局员工 会"继续清除任何地方的敌人"。他还用所谓"法治国家"的借口来强调行动合理性："我们生活在法治国家。我们有根本大法：《宪法》。宪法规定，我国只 有一名总检察长。所以，不能有两个机构做同样的事。" 在马柳克领导下，乌克兰安全局（SBU）的首要任务是团结全国，并抓捕重要罪犯，包括腐败的议员、副部长和法院院长。这实际上 ...