非法采矿
Search documents
厄瓜多尔最大犯罪组织头目在西班牙被捕
Zhong Guo Xin Wen Wang· 2025-11-17 04:37
厄内政部长约翰·雷姆伯格同日称,"皮波"对至少400人的死亡负责,并于2011年至2019年期间在监狱内 指挥犯罪活动。 近年来,厄瓜多尔暴力和谋杀案激增,多个犯罪组织为争夺贩毒路线控制权发生激烈冲突。据美国有线 电视新闻网报道,本月9日,"洛斯洛博斯"成员在厄南部一监狱与敌对组织发生冲突,造成30多名囚犯 死亡。 报道称,"皮波"领导的犯罪组织"洛斯洛博斯"拥有8000名成员,被厄瓜多尔认定为恐怖组织。2021 年,"皮波"的家人声称他因疾病死亡。 诺沃亚16日在社交媒体上说,"洛斯洛博斯"与墨西哥贩毒集团共同控制着非法采矿作业和毒品走私路 线,"皮波"伪造死亡后改变身份逃往欧洲,在欧洲遥控指挥在厄瓜多尔的犯罪行动。 中新社北京11月17日电 综合消息:厄瓜多尔总统诺沃亚当地时间16日宣布,该国最大犯罪组织的头 目、别名"皮波"的威尔默·乔瓦尼·查瓦里亚·巴雷(Wilmer Geovanny Chavarría Barré)已经被捕。 据路透社、英国广播公司16日报道,厄瓜多尔与西班牙警方日前协调开展行动,在西班牙南部城市马拉 加抓获"皮波"。 ...
刚果(金)一矿区简易桥梁坍塌致至少32人遇难
Zhong Guo Xin Wen Wang· 2025-11-17 02:25
中新社北京11月17日电 金沙萨消息:当地时间11月16日,刚果(金)南部卢阿拉巴省当局通报称,该省一 座铜钴矿区内的简易桥梁15日因过度拥挤而发生坍塌事故,并造成至少32人遇难。 综合路透社等媒体消息,卢阿拉巴省内政部长罗伊·卡温巴·马永德(Roy Kaumba Mayonde)在新闻发布会 上称,位于该省卡瓦马村的穆隆多矿区由于塌方风险,已被有关当局严格禁止进入,但非法采矿者15日 仍试图强行进入该矿区,并在此过程中引发了桥梁坍塌的悲剧,导致多人坠落溺水身亡。 据土耳其《每日晨报》(Daily Sabah)、法新社等媒体报道,马永德说,事故发生后,当地政府组织搜救 工作,并暂停了该矿区内的所有手工采矿活动。截至目前,搜救人员已相继找到32具遇难者遗体,且仍 有多人失踪。搜救工作还在持续。 另据美联社等媒体报道,隶属于刚果(金)矿业部的手工和小规模采矿支持与指导服务处(SAEMAPE)16日 发布调查报告称,矿区安保人员在发现上述非法采矿者试图进入采矿区后开枪警告,枪声引发了人群的 恐慌情绪,导致其涌向简易桥梁。但由于人数众多,非法采矿者在此过程中互相推挤,最终引发桥梁的 坍塌。 刚果(金)矿产资源丰富,采 ...
加纳交通部增设挖掘机进口许可证
Shang Wu Bu Wang Zhan· 2025-11-16 03:10
据"加纳广播公司"11月13日报道,加纳财政部长福森博士表示,挖掘机进口商必须事先获得交通部 的批准,同时还要经过船运公司和海关的核实。 (原标题:加纳交通部增设挖掘机进口许可证) 加纳财长在周四议会提交2026年预算声明时宣布,作为结束非法采矿计划的一部分,矿业委员会已 开始在重型设备上安装GPS跟踪装置,以便进行实时监控。 展望未来,加纳财长宣布,《矿产和采矿政策(2014)》和《第703号法案(2006)》正在修订 中。他表示,此次修订将简化授权范围,加强矿产发展基金,并引入小型和中型采矿类别,以弥补监管 方面的不足。 据他介绍,国家打击非法采矿活动秘书处已开始协调各机构的执法工作。一支由1000名警员组成的 专案组已经拆除了非法营地,查获了51台挖掘机、4辆重型卡车和350台水泵,并将33名外国公民移交给 移民当局进行起诉。 加纳财长表示,为了规范小规模采矿,政府于2025年8月启动了负责任的合作采矿和技能发展计 划。此外,"蓝水卫士计划"在全国范围内招募了983名卫士,保护河流和湿地,旨在根除非法采矿的祸 害。据他介绍,对采矿许可证的审查导致300份许可证因违规而被吊销。 ...
最高法发布破坏耕地犯罪典型案例—— 以硬措施守护良田沃土
Jing Ji Ri Bao· 2025-10-23 21:39
Core Points - The Supreme People's Court has released four typical cases highlighting illegal land occupation and mining activities that damage farmland, emphasizing the need for strict enforcement of land use laws [1][2][4] - The court's actions serve as a warning to both industries and individuals regarding the legal consequences of illegal land use [1][2] Summary by Sections Illegal Land Use and Mining - Illegal activities include the unauthorized extraction of soil and peat, leading to significant damage to permanent basic farmland, with one case resulting in over 30 acres of farmland being destroyed [2][3] - The illegal extraction of peat soil amounted to over 10,000 cubic meters, valued at approximately 1.27 million yuan, demonstrating the financial incentives behind such illegal activities [2] Judicial Response - Courts are increasingly punishing illegal land occupation and mining, with over 2,000 cases of illegal land occupation being concluded annually since 2014 [2][3] - The judicial system is focusing on the concealment tactics used by offenders, such as disguising illegal activities under the guise of soil improvement projects [4][5] Corporate Responsibility - Corporate entities are often involved in illegal land use, with a significant number of cases arising from companies seeking short-term profits at the expense of land resources [7][8] - Companies are advised to adhere to legal land use practices and ensure compliance with land use regulations to avoid severe penalties [8] Future Legal Framework - The Supreme People's Court plans to expedite the development of legal interpretations and regulations regarding illegal land occupation cases to enhance judicial consistency and effectiveness [8]
镍:冶炼累库与矿端预期博弈,警惕消息扰动,不锈钢:短线供需与成本博弈,钢价震荡运行
Guo Tai Jun An Qi Huo· 2025-10-09 01:40
Report Summary 1. Investment Rating No investment rating information is provided in the report. 2. Core Viewpoints - Nickel: There is a game between smelting inventory accumulation and ore - end expectations, and attention should be paid to news disturbances [1]. - Stainless steel: There is a game between short - term supply - demand and cost, and steel prices will fluctuate [1]. 3. Summary by Directory 3.1 Fundamental Tracking - **Futures Data**: - For nickel, the closing price of the Shanghai nickel main contract was 120,900, down 200 from T - 1; the trading volume was 127,190, up 29,433 from T - 1 [1]. - For stainless steel, the closing price of the main contract was 12,730, down 30 from T - 1; the trading volume was 224,083, down 51,373 from T - 1 [1]. - **Industrial Chain Data**: - The price of 1 imported nickel was 121,650, up 450 from T - 1; the price of 8 - 12% high - nickel pig iron (ex - factory price) was 954, unchanged from T - 1 [1]. - The price of 304/2B roll - rough edge (Wuxi) Hongwang/Beibuwan was 13,100, unchanged from T - 1; the price of battery - grade nickel sulfate was 28,260, unchanged from T - 1 [1]. 3.2 Macro and Industry News - **Indonesian Policy**: - Indonesia plans to shorten the mining quota period from three years to one year to improve industry governance and control coal and ore supply [1]. - The Indonesian government requires mining companies to resubmit the 2026 Work Plan and Budget (RKAB) starting from October 2025 [4]. - The Indonesian government will punish illegal mining, with reports of 1063 illegal mines [4]. - **Production Changes**: - An Indonesian nickel - iron smelting industrial park suspended all EF production lines due to long - term losses, affecting about 1900 metal tons of nickel - iron production per month [2][4]. - A Shandong steel mill started maintenance due to a 5% annual production reduction target, suspending long - term supply agreements for hot - rolled coil [4]. - The Indonesian forestry working group took over a 148 - hectare nickel mine of PT WedaBav Nickel, affecting about 600 metal tons of nickel ore production per month [5]. - The Indonesian government sanctioned 190 mining companies for not providing claim and refund guarantees [6]. - **Other News**: - China suspended an unofficial subsidy for imported copper and nickel from Russia [6]. 3.3 Trend Intensity - The trend intensity of nickel is +1, and that of stainless steel is +1, indicating a relatively strong trend for both [7].
福建漳州局通报2起矿产资源违法典型案例
Zhong Guo Zi Ran Zi Yuan Bao· 2025-07-16 07:12
Group 1 - The article highlights the enforcement actions taken by the Zhangzhou Natural Resources Bureau to combat illegal mining activities in Fujian Province, emphasizing the importance of legal compliance in mineral resource development [1][2] - Two significant illegal mining cases are detailed, showcasing the legal consequences faced by individuals involved in unauthorized mining operations, including imprisonment and fines [1][2] - The first case involves Chen and others illegally mining without permits, resulting in a total value of illegally mined products amounting to 198,000 yuan, with subsequent legal actions leading to prison sentences and fines [1] Group 2 - The second case discusses Chen's illegal mining activities in the Zhangzhou High-tech Industrial Development Zone, causing damage valued at 237,700 yuan, leading to similar legal repercussions including imprisonment and financial penalties [2] - The article underscores the role of typical cases in educating the public and urging compliance with mining regulations, thereby promoting orderly and lawful resource utilization [1][2] - The total fines and compensation ordered in both cases reflect the government's commitment to enforcing mining laws and protecting mineral resources [1][2]
豫陕两省“千年金矿”案后续:河南法院一审重审 陕西金矿11名员工获罪
Jing Ji Guan Cha Wang· 2025-06-20 00:02
Core Viewpoint - The ongoing legal dispute over the mining rights at the border of Shaanxi and Henan provinces has intensified, with 11 employees of Shaanxi Tongguan Xinyuan Mining Co., Ltd. convicted of illegal mining and related charges, leading to prison sentences and significant fines [1][4]. Group 1: Legal Proceedings - The Zhengzhou Railway Transport Court retried the case, resulting in the conviction of 11 employees, with prison sentences ranging from 1 year and 2 months to 4 years and 6 months [1][4]. - The total fines imposed on the convicted individuals amounted to 3.345 million yuan, and over 47 million yuan in "illegal gains" was confiscated [4]. - The defendants have appealed, arguing that the court's jurisdiction was improperly established due to unresolved territorial disputes between the two provinces [1][6]. Group 2: Evidence and Disputes - A key piece of evidence in the case, the "Geographical Location Determination" documents issued by the Henan Geological and Mineral Exploration Bureau, is alleged to be forged [5][8]. - The defendants claim that the mining site in question is located at the border of the two provinces, and there is a long-standing dispute regarding the administrative boundary [7][8]. - The case has drawn attention from the Ministry of Natural Resources, which has requested verification of the mining activities and potential boundary violations by both provinces [9].