Core Viewpoint - The company reported a decline in revenue and net profit for 2024 and Q1 2025, indicating challenges in the market and increased competition in the downstream new energy sector [1][2]. Financial Performance - For 2024, the company generated revenue of 478 million yuan, a year-on-year decrease of 9.6%, and a net profit of 49 million yuan, down 58.1% [1]. - In Q1 2025, revenue was 107 million yuan, a year-on-year decline of 3.6% but a quarter-on-quarter increase of 6.0%. The net profit was 20 million yuan, reflecting a year-on-year growth of 11.3% [1]. Industry Trends - The demand for testing power supplies in the downstream new energy sector is slowing, with 2024 revenue from testing power supplies at 365 million yuan, a mere 1% increase year-on-year, attributed to pressure on profitability for downstream new energy vehicle and energy storage manufacturers [2]. - The hydrogen energy testing power supply segment saw a revenue of 95 million yuan in 2024, down 15% year-on-year, with weak demand in the fuel cell sector but high growth in electrolyzer testing power supply demand [2]. Profitability Metrics - The gross margin for Q1 2025 was 37.6%, a decrease of 13.6 percentage points year-on-year due to industry price competition. The company maintained good control over expense ratios, with sales, management, R&D, and financial expense ratios at 12.9%, 10.8%, 16.4%, and -1.1%, respectively [3]. - The net profit margin for Q1 2025 was 19.0%, an increase of 2.6 percentage points year-on-year [3]. Profit Forecast and Valuation - Due to intense price competition, the net profit forecast for 2025 has been revised down by 4% to 109 million yuan, with a new estimate for 2026 at 170 million yuan. The current stock price corresponds to a P/E ratio of 20.2 for 2025 and 13.0 for 2026 [4]. - The company maintains an outperform rating and a target price of 30 yuan, implying a potential upside of 13.9% from the current stock price [4].

Core Viewpoint - The building materials industry, closely linked to real estate, has faced revenue and profit pressures since 2021, but is now showing signs of demand stabilization and potential profit recovery due to policy shifts and market dynamics [1][5]. Group 1: Demand Outlook - The demand for building materials is expected to decline in 2025, but the rate of decline is narrowing, with a positive second derivative indicating potential recovery [2][4]. - Infrastructure investment is anticipated to improve due to reduced local government debt pressures and a more favorable financing environment, with a notable decrease in the growth rate of municipal financing debt [2]. - The real estate sector is experiencing significant declines in new construction and completion areas, but overall sales are expected to turn positive, indicating a potential shift in demand for building materials [3]. Group 2: Industry Dynamics - The "anti-involution" policy introduced by the government aims to curb excessive competition in the building materials sector, which has seen profit margins reach historical lows [6]. - The competitive landscape is crucial for recovery; larger firms with better market positions can influence pricing more effectively, while smaller firms may struggle [6][9]. - Companies like Beixin Building Materials, with over 60% market share, have demonstrated resilience during demand downturns, maintaining profitability in their gypsum board business [7]. Group 3: Price Recovery and Elasticity - The price recovery in the fiberglass sector is leading the way, with price increases initiated in early 2025 due to better demand and competitive conditions [8]. - The cement industry, while facing weaker demand than fiberglass, has a favorable competitive structure, with significant price increases observed in early 2025 [9]. - The consumer building materials sector, although lagging behind in demand recovery, shows potential for higher market value elasticity as the industry undergoes consolidation [9]. Group 4: Investment Strategy - The building materials industry presents structural investment opportunities under the "anti-involution" policy, with profits at a bottom and companies collaborating on price increases [12].