Workflow
资产接管
icon
Search documents
全球最大豪华酒店业主,8年痛失70家酒店
3 6 Ke· 2025-10-15 00:27
Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the dramatic decline of R&F Properties, which was once the world's largest luxury hotel owner, as it faces a liquidity crisis and is forced to sell off its hotel assets to alleviate debt pressure [5][18][45]. Group 1: Hotel Acquisition and Ownership - Eight years ago, R&F Properties acquired 77 hotels from Wanda for 189.55 billion yuan, marking a significant transaction in the luxury hotel sector [1]. - After the acquisition, R&F owned 91 luxury hotels, gaining the title of the world's largest luxury hotel owner [2]. - Currently, R&F's hotel portfolio has shrunk to only 21 hotels, following the recent sale of the Changsha R&F Wanda Hotel for a starting price of 5.14 billion yuan [3][12]. Group 2: Asset Liquidation and Financial Struggles - R&F has been selling hotels since 2022 to manage liquidity issues, but the market response has been disappointing [6]. - The company has faced significant losses on hotel sales, including a 653,000 yuan loss on the sale of the Beijing Wanda Jiahua Hotel and a 30% drop in the sale price of the Fuzhou Westin Hotel [7]. - As of 2024, R&F's financial situation worsened, with a reported net loss of 177.1 billion yuan and a cash balance of only 38.64 billion yuan [18][19]. Group 3: Market Trends and Challenges - The luxury hotel market is experiencing a downturn, with a 5.5% decline in average RevPAR across major cities [34]. - R&F's hotel business, despite being a significant asset, has been negatively impacted by high leverage and operational costs, leading to continuous losses from 2018 to 2024 [25][30]. - The broader trend shows real estate companies increasingly selling hotel assets to relieve financial pressure amid a challenging market environment [31][40]. Group 4: Future Outlook - R&F's remaining 21 hotels may still face challenges as the company navigates its liquidity crisis and attempts to restructure its debt [45]. - The article suggests that simply selling hotel assets may not be sufficient to resolve R&F's financial difficulties, emphasizing the need for effective management and operational strategies [40][41].
约550亿元全球资产被清盘人接管,许家印还剩什么?
首席商业评论· 2025-10-13 04:53
以下文章来源于凤凰网财经 ,作者凤凰网财经 凤凰网财经 . 你好,我们是凤凰网财经,全球华人都在看的财经公众号,传播最有价值的财经报道,你值得关注!欢 迎访问:http://finance.ifeng.com/ 继信托资产被击穿后,许家印的资产处置迎来关键性转折。 此前,香港高等法院已对许家印发出"全球禁制令",明确禁止其处置全球范围内价值不超过77亿美元(约合 人民币550亿元)的资产。而据《每日经济新闻》报道,法院在最新判决中进一步指定中国恒大集团清盘人 为许家印家族相关资产的接管人。 此次被清盘人接管的资产清单具体明确,覆盖三大核心类别:一是33家境外公司的权益,二是7个银行账户 内的资金,三是私人飞机、豪 华汽车、游艇等价值高昂的个人贵重物品。 但公众的疑问仍在发酵:资产接连被管控的许家印,如今还剩多少自主支配的资产?其前妻丁玉梅此前"月 领2万英镑"的待遇,是否会随资产接管戛然而止? 2019 年前后,许家印、丁玉梅夫妇曾在美国设立规模高达 23 亿美元的单一家庭信托基金,并明确指定其二 子为该信托的受益人。 恒大爆发债务危机后,这些境外资产自然成为债权人重点紧盯的目标。 而香港高等法院近期已作出判 ...
550亿资产?“清算”许家印
Sou Hu Cai Jing· 2025-09-19 10:38
Group 1 - The recent court ruling allows the liquidator of Evergrande to take over Xu Jiayin's assets due to the risk of asset loss or dissipation, as Xu's family has not complied with court orders [2] - Xu Jiayin's total assets are estimated at approximately $7.7 billion, equivalent to 55 billion RMB, including luxury properties, cars, private jets, yachts, bank deposits, and company shares [2][7] - The assets include three luxury houses in Hong Kong valued at 2 billion HKD, a private jet worth $45 million, and luxury yachts, while Evergrande shares are considered the least valuable among these assets [2][7] Group 2 - The ownership of many of Xu's properties is held by offshore companies, making it difficult to trace the assets [8] - The liquidator has only identified 33 companies linked to Xu's assets, indicating that not all assets may be accounted for [9] - Xu Jiayin's family has engaged in "technical separation" to protect their assets, with Xu's ex-wife Ding Yumei now pursuing legal claims against their son for financial recovery [10][12] Group 3 - Ding Yumei has been implicated in the asset recovery case and has been accused of violating asset freeze orders while purchasing properties in the UK [14][15] - The total debts owed by Evergrande's major creditors are substantial, with many banks facing significant bad debts due to their exposure to Evergrande [17] - South Tong Sanjian, a major construction partner of Evergrande, is facing asset liquidation due to debts amounting to 36 billion RMB owed by Evergrande [20][24] Group 4 - The construction industry has been severely impacted by Evergrande's financial troubles, with many suppliers facing bankruptcy or debt restructuring [25] - Even if all of Xu Jiayin's assets were liquidated, it would not be sufficient to cover the extensive debts incurred by Evergrande and its partners [26]
彻底清算许家印!全球77亿美元资产被冻结
3 6 Ke· 2025-09-16 06:02
Core Viewpoint - The Hong Kong High Court has ordered the liquidators of China Evergrande to take control of Xu Jiayin's assets, issuing a global injunction against the disposal of assets valued at up to $7.7 billion [1][2]. Group 1: Legal Proceedings - The court appointed liquidators Huang Yongshi and Du Aidi as receivers to manage Xu Jiayin's assets, emphasizing that the appointment is necessary to assist in locating and controlling assets subject to the injunction [1][3]. - Xu Jiayin's legal team argued that the appointment of a receiver was too drastic and would interfere with his private affairs, but the court rejected this claim [2]. - The court has mandated Xu Jiayin to disclose all assets valued over HKD 50,000, which he has failed to comply with, leading to a finding of contempt of court [3]. Group 2: Asset Overview - The assets under Xu Jiayin's control include luxury properties, vehicles, private jets, and a significant number of offshore companies, some of which are not tied to Evergrande's financing obligations [4]. - As of July 2025, China Evergrande's total debt exceeds RMB 2 trillion, and it has been delisted from the Hong Kong Stock Exchange due to regulatory non-compliance [4]. - The liquidators reported that as of July 2025, China Evergrande has only $255 million in liquid assets abroad, with direct realizable assets amounting to just $11 million, highlighting a significant shortfall compared to its massive debts [4].