Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the significant backlash against the game "Mingmo: Yuanshu Zhi Yu," highlighting the disconnect between player expectations and the game's actual performance, leading to a cultural and political discourse surrounding its release [5][15][40]. Group 1: Game Quality and Reception - Prior to its release, "Mingmo: Yuanshu Zhi Yu" received positive early reviews, with IGN and GS both scoring it 8, indicating a strong expectation from players [5]. - After 21 hours of gameplay, the game was deemed to have acceptable quality, with a solid map design and combat system that encourages diverse strategies [8][10]. - Despite the game’s quality, it faced a severe backlash on release day, resulting in a low approval rating of 19% due to various operational and narrative issues [16][17]. Group 2: Reasons for Backlash - The backlash stemmed from three main issues: mismatched rewards between deluxe and standard editions, a price drop in the Chinese market that angered players, and a narrative perceived as disrespectful to Han culture [17][18][19]. - The game was labeled as "Han traitor game" due to these perceived insults, leading to widespread criticism and personal attacks on content creators discussing the game [21][22]. Group 3: Cultural and Political Implications - The situation reflects a deeper cultural memory divide, where different groups project their sentiments onto the historical context of the Ming dynasty, turning it into a semantic minefield [26][27]. - The game's marketing strategy, which aimed to leverage the emotionally charged historical context, ultimately backfired, revealing the complexities of identity politics in contemporary discourse [29][30]. - The article suggests that the game's reception is not solely based on its quality but rather on how it interacts with sensitive cultural emotions, indicating a broader trend of products being scrutinized through the lens of ideological narratives [37][40].

Core Viewpoint - The game "Mingmo: Yuanshu Zhi Yu" has experienced a significant drop in reputation despite initial positive reviews, highlighting the complexities of cultural and emotional expectations surrounding it [1][11][28]. Group 1: Game Quality and Design - The game is considered to have a competent quality, with a map design that allows for exploration, although it does not reach the level of renowned titles in the genre [5]. - The battle system encourages players to experiment with different combat styles, featuring a unique design that reduces difficulty through resource management [7][9]. - Despite its quality, the game faced a backlash due to operational and narrative issues, leading to a low approval rating of 19% at launch [11][28]. Group 2: Cultural and Emotional Context - The title "Mingmo" evokes strong historical sentiments among players, representing a complex intersection of nationalism and nostalgia [2][18]. - The game's narrative choices have sparked outrage, as the absence of certain historical representations has been perceived as offensive, leading to accusations of being a "traitor game" [11][13]. - The cultural memory surrounding the Ming dynasty has become a contentious topic, reflecting broader societal divisions and identity politics [18][41]. Group 3: Market and Commercial Strategy - The marketing strategy of leveraging a sensitive historical context has backfired, as it attracted attention but ultimately led to significant backlash [23][25]. - The game's initial promotional tactics were effective in generating interest, but the disconnect between player expectations and the actual experience resulted in a rapid decline in reputation [25][28]. - The game's performance on platforms like Steam shows a stark contrast in approval ratings between Chinese and international players, indicating that the criticism is rooted in cultural sensitivities rather than game quality [28].

Group 1 - Harvard University has become a focal point of global public opinion due to a series of controversial events reflecting deep societal contradictions in the U.S. [1] - The conflict between the Trump administration and Harvard is fundamentally about the boundaries of educational autonomy and government regulation, originating from protests supporting Palestine that sparked anti-Semitic controversies [3] - Harvard's response to the government's pressure included a public rebuttal, emphasizing academic freedom and institutional autonomy, contrasting sharply with the Trump administration's hardline stance [5] Group 2 - The Trump administration's measures, while causing widespread public uproar, face significant implementation challenges, such as vague standards for reporting international students' activities [5] - The financial implications of these policies could severely impact Harvard's revenue from international students, which amounts to hundreds of millions annually, and could hinder its STEM research projects due to talent loss [5] - The ongoing debate over educational equity in the U.S. highlights accusations against Harvard for implementing de facto discrimination through racial quotas in admissions, particularly against Asian students [11] Group 3 - The rise of nativist sentiments in the U.S. is reflected in the Trump administration's policies towards international students, which could undermine America's global innovation leadership [9] - The events at Harvard and other universities illustrate the tension between maintaining free speech and ensuring personal safety amid rising identity politics [13] - Overall, the controversies surrounding Harvard represent a microcosm of the broader challenges facing American society in balancing multicultural coexistence with national interests [15]

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the intersection of scent and politics, highlighting how fragrances can influence political identity and consumer behavior, particularly through the example of Donald Trump's fragrance launch [4][10][16]. Group 1: Scent and Consumer Behavior - Modern consumers rely on reviews and visual content for purchasing decisions, but fragrance remains an exception where consumers must rely on guesswork [4]. - Trump's upcoming fragrance, Victory 47, has garnered significant attention despite negative reviews on fragrance rating platforms, indicating a disconnect between marketing and consumer experience [12][13]. Group 2: Political Implications of Scent - The marketing of Trump's fragrance emphasizes themes of power and patriotism, aiming to create a sense of identity among supporters [10][16]. - Historical examples show that various political figures have utilized scent as a branding tool, with fragrances linked to political movements and ideologies [25][32]. Group 3: Scent as a Social Divider - The article explores how scent has been used to reinforce social and racial divisions, with historical references to how odors have been associated with class and ethnicity [44][59]. - The evolution of hygiene standards has transformed perceptions of scent, leading to discrimination based on body odor and reinforcing societal hierarchies [49][66]. Group 4: Contemporary Relevance - The article highlights the ongoing relevance of scent in modern political and social contexts, including how perceptions of odor can affect public opinion and personal identity [66][70]. - It emphasizes the need to recognize the role of scent in shaping societal norms and individual behaviors, particularly in urban environments [67][73].

Group 1 - The article discusses the unique challenges of marketing perfumes, emphasizing that consumers often rely on subjective reviews rather than direct sensory experience [1][3] - Trump's upcoming fragrance, Victory 47, has garnered significant attention despite receiving negative reviews on fragrance rating platforms, highlighting the disconnect between marketing and consumer perception [8][12] - The marketing strategy for Trump's fragrance is tied to political branding, aiming to create a sense of identity among supporters through scent [12][18] Group 2 - The article explores the historical context of scent in politics, noting that various political figures have previously launched their own fragrances as a means of branding [18][25] - It highlights the findings of a study that identified scent preferences among different political affiliations, suggesting that scent can influence political identity [28] - The relationship between scent and social class is examined, indicating that perceptions of odor have been used to justify social hierarchies and discrimination throughout history [35][44] Group 3 - The article discusses how scent has been politicized, affecting societal structures and contributing to class and racial divisions [35][49] - It references historical examples where scent was used to dehumanize certain groups, illustrating the deep-rooted connections between odor and societal perceptions [44][45] - The modern implications of scent politics are explored, particularly in relation to urban living and the stigmatization of certain odors associated with socioeconomic status [51][52]

Group 1 - The controversy surrounding the translation of feminist works by male translators raises questions about gender identity in literary creation [1][2][4] - The discussion extends to whether specific groups have the legitimacy to interpret certain topics, such as whether male directors can accurately portray female characters or if able-bodied actors can play disabled roles [1][2][15] - The issue of "writing rights" is highlighted, noting that historically, many significant concepts regarding women have been articulated by male authors [4][8] Group 2 - The emergence of identity politics in literature prompts a reevaluation of how identity influences cultural life and artistic expression [2][21] - The distinction between male and female authorship is emphasized, with a focus on the challenges female writers face in gaining recognition and the societal structures that hinder their visibility [9][22] - The concept of "internal perspective" is discussed, suggesting that authentic representation in storytelling requires the involvement of those from the represented group [15][18] Group 3 - The film industry is noted for its evolving dynamics, where the representation of marginalized groups is increasingly being questioned, leading to a demand for more authentic narratives [17][20] - The discussion includes the impact of gender on creative processes, with examples of how female directors may approach filmmaking differently than their male counterparts [20][21] - The need for more diverse voices in literature and film is underscored, as the current landscape often limits creators to narratives tied to their identities [22][23]