Core Viewpoint - The case revolves around the actions of Che, who used Company A's name to "invest" in Company B, ultimately obtaining over 4.15 million yuan in "dividends," raising questions about whether this constitutes a violation of business regulations or embezzlement [2][18]. Summary by Sections Basic Case Facts - Che joined the Communist Party in June 1994 and served as the chairman and general manager of Company A, a state-owned enterprise, until his retirement in October 2021 [3]. Embezzlement Details - In October 2013, Che arranged for an employee to register Company B under his name, with a registered capital of 1 million yuan, which was loaned from a state-owned small loan company [4]. - Company B was managed by Company A's asset management department and was used as a tool for external business operations [4][5]. - In 2014, Che manipulated the financing service contracts to benefit Company B, which he knew was profitable and low-risk, and decided to "invest" in Company B to extract its profits [5]. Financial Transactions and Control - From March to December 2015, Che facilitated the transfer of 50% of Company B's shares to Company A and its management team without any payment, maintaining control over the company [6]. - Between September 2016 and March 2017, Che received over 4.15 million yuan in dividends from Company B based on a 30% shareholding [6]. Investigation and Legal Proceedings - The investigation into Che's actions began on June 27, 2023, leading to his detention and subsequent legal actions, including a public prosecution for embezzlement [8][9][10]. - On January 11, 2024, the court sentenced Che to 11 years and 6 months in prison for embezzlement, along with a fine of 1.3 million yuan [11]. Company Nature and Legal Implications - There are differing opinions on whether Company B is a state-owned enterprise or a private company, but evidence suggests it is controlled by Company A, thus qualifying as a state-owned entity [13][14][17]. - Che's actions, including undervaluing Company B's shares and using its funds for personal gain, are classified as embezzlement under the law [22][25]. Conclusion on Che's Actions - Che's investment in Company B was deemed a means to unlawfully acquire state-owned assets, constituting embezzlement rather than a legitimate business activity [21][25].

杨某于2 0 1 0年1 0月报名参加雅安市公开招录公务员考试，经过笔试、面试、体检、考察等程 序，于2 0 11年4月被录用为雅安市城市管理行政执法支队（参照公务员法管理事业单位）工作 人员。2 0 1 4年9月，借调至雅安市投资促进局（参照公务员法管理事业单位）工作。2 0 1 5年1 月，调入雅安市投资促进局下属科级事业单位雅安市投资促进服务中心工作。2 0 1 7年2月，杨 某 以夫妻长 期 两 地 分 居 、 无 法照顾小孩为由，向雅安市投资促 进 局 提 出 辞 聘 申 请 。 2 0 1 7 年 3 月，雅安市投资促进局按程序与其解除聘用合同。 2 0 11年4月至2 0 1 4年9月，杨某作为雅安市城市管理行政执法支队工作人员，主要从事市容市 貌管理、违法建筑查处等工作，未参与灾后重建项目工作。2 0 1 4年9月至2 0 1 7年3月，杨某在 雅安市投资促进局及其下属事业单位雅安市投资促进服务中心工作期间，主要负责招商引资 网络平台管理、信息服务等工作，协助开展招商引资活动组织协调工作，其工作不涉及灾后 重建项目招标、资金审批管理和慈善捐款。雅安市投资促进局通过官方平台发布的招商引资 项目中 ...