深圳商报·读创客户端记者 詹钰叶 千亿公募中银基金日前宣布，来自公司大股东的刘信群出任董事长、法定代表人，执行总裁张家文为期半年的代任期随之结束。公司新任董事长即将面对的 挑战包括化解"迷你基"的生存危机、稳定人才队伍等。 刘信群加入中银基金之前，长期任职于中国银行系统，并在体系内历任多个重要岗位。履历显示，刘信群历任中国银行司库助理总经理，中国银行深圳市分 行行长助理、党委委员，中国银行深圳市分行副行长、党委委员，中国银行（香港）有限公司风险管理部总经理，中国银行司库总经理，中国银行深圳市分 行行长、党委书记等。 中银基金官网信息 中银基金成立于2004年8月，中国银行和贝莱德投资管理（英国）有限公司分别持有其83.5%、16.5%股份。根据公司官网发布的信息，目前中银基金5名非 独立董事中，除了董事长刘信群、执行总裁张家文之外，董事梁晓钟为中国银行总行风险管理部副总经理；8名高级管理人员中，副执行总裁兼督察长陈卫 星、副执行总裁赵永东与副执行总裁宁瑞洁均来自中国银行。 近年来，中银基金规模持续增长。据同花顺数据，至今年三季度末，中银基金的管理规模为7030.88亿元，同比、环比均实现不同程度的增长，在同业 ...

Core Viewpoint - The article highlights a trend among certain "mini funds" adopting a defensive stance by significantly reducing their stock holdings to near cash levels, missing out on the recent market rally despite an overall positive market trend for actively managed equity funds [1][4]. Fund Performance and Strategy - Some flexible allocation funds, particularly smaller ones, have drastically decreased their stock positions in Q3, with cash assets, such as bank deposits, dominating their portfolios. For instance, the Fuanda New Power fund saw its stock allocation plummet from 87.5% at the end of Q2 to just 1.35% by the end of Q3, with over 98% of its assets held in cash [2]. - The Zhongyin Zhenli fund reported a stock allocation of only 12% in Q3, with 85% of its assets in bank deposits, indicating a conservative investment approach compared to peers [2]. - The Green Fund's Green Bory also exhibited a similar trend, with a stock allocation of just 11.23% and over 60% in cash, reflecting a cautious strategy amid market fluctuations [3]. - The Galaxy Junshang fund had a mere 0.94% in stocks by the end of Q3, primarily holding cash and bonds, contrasting sharply with its previous "heavy stock, light bond" strategy [3]. Market Context and Fund Manager Sentiment - Despite the overall market strength, with indices reaching around 4000 points and a continued upward trend in technology stocks, some fund managers opted for significant cash positions, possibly due to profit-taking from previously popular sectors or a cautious outlook on future market movements [4].

Core Viewpoint - The article highlights the challenges faced by Taixin Fund, particularly the scale crisis of several funds with net assets below 50 million yuan for over 60 consecutive working days, alongside issues of "style drift" that have led to negative ratings from professional agencies [1][2][6]. Fund Scale Challenges - Six funds under Taixin Fund are reported to have net assets below 50 million yuan, including Taixin CSI 200, Taixin Balanced Value A, Taixin Huixin Three-Month Open A, Taixin Internet + A, Taixin Advantage Growth, and Taixin Smart Growth A [2][4]. - The Taixin Advantage Leading Mixed Fund, established in September 2022, saw a net value drop of 9.63% in 2023, ranking in the top 30% of its peers, but by 2025, despite a 23.38% increase in net value, it fell to the 2979th position out of 4500 similar funds [2][3]. Regulatory Compliance and Solutions - The fund manager disclosed that the fund has been below the 50 million yuan threshold for over 60 days and has submitted a solution to the regulatory authority, which may include options like continued operation, conversion, merger with other funds, or termination of the fund contract [4][5]. - The fund management company has committed to maintaining the interests of fund holders by bearing the fixed costs associated with the affected funds [4]. Style Drift Issues - Taixin Fund's products have faced criticism for "style drift," leading to a lack of ratings from agencies like Jiaan Jinxin, which noted that significant deviations from the investment style outlined in the fund contracts could harm investors [6][8]. - For instance, the Taixin Internet + Mixed Fund, which should primarily invest in internet infrastructure, has shifted its focus to major holdings in companies like Kweichow Moutai and Agricultural Bank of China, raising concerns about adherence to its stated investment strategy [6][8]. Future Strategies - In response to the style drift concerns, Taixin Fund plans to focus on sectors that leverage modern technology and services, particularly in AI and healthcare, to align with its investment themes [9]. - The company aims to enhance its research and marketing strategies to foster sustainable growth, emphasizing the importance of matching product offerings with research capabilities rather than pursuing rapid scale expansion [10].

Core Viewpoint - The article highlights the increasing number of mutual funds facing liquidation in June 2025, with 117 funds having exited the market year-to-date, primarily due to insufficient scale and performance issues [1][5]. Fund Liquidation Reasons - A total of 97 funds triggered contract termination clauses due to not meeting scale requirements, marking a 40% increase compared to the same period last year [1]. - Many funds are unable to grow in scale, leading to their closure, with some experiencing long-term poor performance while others saw capital withdrawal after outperforming benchmarks [1][3]. - Significant redemptions by single large investors have also contributed to the rapid decline in fund sizes, pushing them close to liquidation [1][7]. Performance vs. Scale - Some recently liquidated funds, such as the浦银安盛幸福回报定开债券, had stable returns but still could not maintain sufficient scale, with a net asset value below 50 million yuan [3]. - The金鹰品质 fund, which had a year-to-date increase of over 11%, also faced liquidation due to scale issues [3]. Current Market Landscape - As of June 16, 2025, there are 1,655 mutual funds with net asset values below 50 million yuan, with mixed funds being the most affected [7]. - The trend of increasing fund liquidations is attributed to market competition, poor performance, and the capabilities of fund managers and distribution channels [7]. ETF Liquidation Risks - Even in a strong market, some ETFs are facing liquidation risks, with 18 passive index funds having been liquidated this year [8]. - Specific ETFs, such as博时国证龙头家电ETF, are on the brink of liquidation due to consistently low asset values, despite temporary increases in scale [9][10].

Core Insights - The public fund industry is undergoing a process of elimination, with an increase in fund liquidations due to intense competition and market saturation [1][4][7] - A total of 91 funds have been liquidated this year, marking a 15.19% increase compared to the same period last year, with the majority being equity mixed funds [4][6] - The rise in fund liquidations is attributed to the poor performance of many actively managed equity products, leading to continuous redemptions and eventual closures [7] Fund Liquidation Details - On May 19, multiple fund managers announced the termination and liquidation of several products, including a mixed FOF and two mixed funds [2][3] - The West China Fund's FOF was automatically terminated due to its net asset value falling below 200 million yuan, triggering a liquidation process without a holder meeting [2][3] - Other funds, including those from FuGuo and RuiDa, also faced liquidation for similar reasons, primarily due to asset sizes below 200 million yuan after three years of operation [3] Market Trends - The majority of liquidated funds this year belong to 51 different fund management companies, with ChunHou Fund having the highest number of liquidations at six products [4][6] - There are over 1,041 "mini funds" in the market with assets below 50 million yuan, indicating a significant number of funds are on the brink of liquidation [5][6] - The competitive landscape is pushing fund managers to enhance product competitiveness and service capabilities to avoid being eliminated [7]