Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the growing resistance from authors against AI-generated content in the literary industry, highlighting legal actions and personal experiences that reflect the impact of AI on traditional writing and the challenges faced by authors in a rapidly changing landscape [4][5][6]. Group 1: Author Resistance and Legal Actions - A collective lawsuit was filed by authors against Apple for unauthorized use of their works to train AI models, indicating a significant pushback against AI in the literary field [4]. - Over a thousand authors signed an open letter demanding publishers not to release machine-generated books, emphasizing the importance of human creativity in literature [4]. Group 2: Impact of AI on the Online Literature Industry - The influx of AI-generated content on platforms like Tomato Novel has surged, with new book releases increasing from 400 to 5,606 in one year, a 1,300% rise [8]. - Despite attempts by platforms to control AI content, the volume of AI-generated works continues to disrupt the flow of new authors and their potential earnings [8][9]. Group 3: Author Experiences and Challenges - Authors like "Cang Shu" and "Xiao Zhang" have reported significant drops in their readership and income due to the overwhelming presence of AI-generated content, leading to feelings of frustration and confusion [9][10]. - The introduction of AI-assisted writing tools has allowed for rapid content production, but many authors feel their traditional writing efforts are being overshadowed [9][10]. Group 4: AI Content Production and Monetization - Individuals and small teams are leveraging AI to produce large volumes of content quickly, with one author reportedly generating a 200,000-word novel in just a few hours [20][27]. - The monetization of AI-generated content is evident, with some authors successfully selling rights to their AI-generated works, indicating a new revenue stream in the industry [27][28]. Group 5: Industry Response and Future Outlook - Platforms are currently siding with traditional authors, implementing measures to limit low-quality AI content while still grappling with the challenges posed by AI advancements [30][32]. - The future of the online literature industry remains uncertain as the capabilities of AI continue to evolve, raising questions about the long-term impact on human authors and the quality of literary works [33][34].

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the ongoing conflict between human authors and AI-generated content in the online literature industry, highlighting the challenges faced by writers as AI technology evolves and begins to dominate the market [4][9][23]. Group 1: AI Impact on Authors - A significant increase in AI-generated content has been observed on platforms like Tomato Novel, with new book releases skyrocketing from 400 to 5,606 in one year, marking a 1,300% increase [8]. - Many authors report a drastic decline in their readership and income due to the influx of AI content, leading to feelings of frustration and confusion about the platform's management of AI-generated works [10][12]. - The introduction of AI-assisted writing tools has allowed for rapid content production, enabling some authors to generate up to 20,000 words daily, which has further intensified competition [10][21]. Group 2: Market Dynamics - The article notes that AI-generated content is increasingly being produced in bulk, with individuals and small teams using AI to create multiple works simultaneously, often based on popular narratives [24][28]. - Despite the challenges posed by AI, there remains a market for AI writing tools and courses, with some individuals successfully monetizing AI-generated content through copyright sales [30][31]. - The online literature industry is experiencing a shift, with platforms like Tomato Novel and Jinjiang taking measures to regulate AI content, yet the effectiveness of these regulations remains uncertain [39][40]. Group 3: Author Reactions and Resistance - Authors have expressed strong opposition to platforms using their work to train AI, leading to widespread protests and demands for better protection of their rights [37][38]. - Some authors have chosen to leave platforms that do not align with their values regarding AI content, while others are exploring alternative avenues within the industry [14][36]. - The article highlights a divide among authors, with some embracing AI as a tool for collaboration, while others remain skeptical of its ability to replicate the nuances of human creativity [15][20].

作家们拒绝机器代替人类成为表达情感、表达认知的主体，以这样的行动捍卫人文学科的尊严。这一反抗背后的残酷事实是，AI创作的内容已经可以与畅 销书作家的作品并列于书架之上。 同样的 危机 也 在国内网文行业 上演。 "我天生夹子音，做作得不行。"这是小沈发布在知乎上的短篇小说的开头。 时隔半年多，小沈发现番茄小说上到处都是这个开头，还有各种各样AI改编后的版本——主要角色人设和整体情节都与小沈的设计大差不差，只是冗余的 细节 更多了，带着浓浓的AI味。 人们慢慢开始分不清AI和人类的创作。 作者 | 兰杰 编辑 | 乔芊 文字创作者们对 AI的反抗正频频发生。 最近的一次发生在九月初。大洋彼岸，美国著名作家格雷迪·亨德里克斯与詹妮弗·罗伯逊代表数百名作者，向科技巨头苹果公司发起集体诉讼，指控其未 经授权使用盗版书籍训练AI模型OpenELM。 而就在三个月前， 超千名 作者 签署了 公开信，要求 出版商承诺永远不会发行机器创造 的书籍， 抗议的作者中 包括《小镇女孩的秘密》作者劳伦·格 罗夫、《魔术师》三部曲作者列夫·格罗斯曼等等。 小沈选择一一举报，侵权的作品被平台下架，但收入还是没有追回。 她的经历并非个例， ...