| 案 由 非国家工作人员受贿 点击了解更多 | 案 | | | --- | --- | --- | | | | ଦି କି | | 发布日期 2025-12-18 | 浏览次数 39 | | 作者丨叶映橙 见习记者林健民 编辑丨张楠 12月24日，21财经·南财快讯记者从中国裁判文书网获悉， 上海某券商分析师有偿撰写研 报，收取"好处费"18万元，目前已被判刑 。 上海市浦东新区人民法院12月18日公开的一审判决书显示，被告人邹某，男，1988年11月 29日出生于山东省德州市，博士研究生文化，原系东方某有限公司（以下简称"东方某公 司"）研究所电子行业首席分析师；被告人程某，男，1987年8月13日出生于湖北省嘉鱼 县，硕士研究生文化，原系东方某公司研究所电新行业高级分析师。 经浦东新区人民法院审理查明，2023年4月，被告人邹某、程某接受宋某甲（另案处理）请 托，利用被告人邹某时任东方某公司研究所电子行业首席分析师的职权，为某公司江苏利通 电子股份有限公司（利通电子，603629.SH）撰写研究报告，以增加该公司股票的市场关注 度。 其中，被告人邹某负责组织研究报告的撰写，实际收取宋某甲好处费人民币18 ...

Core Viewpoint - A significant bribery case involving a senior executive of a large chain supermarket in Shanghai has been uncovered, revealing a scheme where the executive solicited substantial "loans" from suppliers, amounting to over 7 million yuan, disguised as friendly financial transactions [1][2]. Group 1: Case Details - The investigation began after numerous anonymous complaints targeted the supermarket's East China operations head, who was found to have intervened in bidding processes for personal gain [1]. - The executive, identified as Guan, requested over 3 million yuan from a logistics supplier during a critical contract renewal period, without any formal loan agreements, which indicated a clear violation of normal lending practices [1]. - Guan's actions were characterized as a form of "buying road money" to secure business opportunities, as he promised continued business in exchange for the funds [1]. Group 2: Background and Methodology - Prior to his promotion, Guan had established a relationship with the supplier, who initially used gifts to gain favor, which escalated into blatant bribery over time [1]. - The investigation revealed that Guan regularly solicited funds under various pretexts, accumulating a total of over 7 million yuan from the supplier by the time of the case's exposure [1][2]. Group 3: Legal Consequences - Guan has been arrested for accepting bribes, while the supplier has been charged with bribing a non-state worker, and an accomplice has been implicated for concealing the illicit funds [2]. - Authorities emphasized that such internal corruption not only harms corporate interests but also undermines fair market competition, urging companies to strengthen internal controls to combat corruption [2].

Core Viewpoint - The announcement from Sierte (002538.SZ) regarding the transfer of a case involving former executives and intermediary personnel to the local prosecutor's office has caused significant concern in the brokerage community [1][5]. Group 1: Case Details - The case involves ten suspects, including former chairman Jin Guoqing and former general manager Jin Zhenghui, with charges including embezzlement, bribery, fraud, and issuing false VAT invoices [5]. - Notably, Sun Bin, a representative from the securities service intermediary, is also implicated and may become the first sponsor representative to be sent for prosecution in 2025 [5]. - The investigation was triggered by internal audits revealing irregularities in the accounts of a subsidiary, leading to a report filed by the company in January 2024 after several executives resigned [5]. Group 2: Financing History - Since its listing in 2011, Sierte has conducted four refinancing activities from 2014 to 2019, all sponsored by Guoyuan Securities [5]. - Sun Bin was involved in two significant financing projects: a private placement raising 1.07 billion yuan in September 2015 and an 800 million yuan convertible bond issuance in 2019 [5]. Group 3: Market Reactions - Sun Bin has been withdrawing from multiple ongoing projects since June 2025, raising market speculation about his status prior to the confirmation of his involvement in the Sierte case [6].

Core Viewpoint - The announcement from Sierte (002538.SZ) regarding the transfer of a case involving former executives and intermediary personnel to the local prosecutor's office has caused significant concern in the brokerage community [1] Group 1: Case Details - The case involves ten suspects, including former chairman Jin Guoqing and former general manager Jin Zhenghui, with charges including embezzlement, bribery, fraud, and issuing false VAT invoices [4][5] - Sun Bin, a representative from Guoyuan Securities, is also implicated and may become the first sponsor representative to be sent for prosecution in 2025 [4][6] Group 2: Financial Background - Sierte has conducted four refinancing projects from 2014 to 2019, all sponsored by Guoyuan Securities, including a private placement raising 1.07 billion yuan in September 2015 and an 800 million yuan convertible bond issuance in 2019 [5] - The investigation was triggered by internal audits revealing irregularities in the accounts of a subsidiary, leading to a report filed by the company in January 2024 [5] Group 3: Implications for Securities Industry - Sun Bin has recently withdrawn from multiple ongoing projects, raising market speculation about his status prior to the case's escalation [6] - The case highlights potential risks associated with the oversight and accountability of securities service intermediaries in financing projects [5][6]

Core Points - The company, Sierte (002538.SZ), has received a notice from the Xuancheng Public Security Bureau regarding the transfer of a case involving former executives suspected of embezzlement and other crimes [1] - The case involves multiple individuals, including former directors and senior management, who are accused of misappropriating substantial company assets and engaging in fraudulent activities [1][2] Summary by Sections - **Criminal Allegations**: The allegations include embezzlement of large sums from the company and its wholly-owned subsidiary, as well as fabricating transactions to misappropriate funds and obtain government subsidies [1] - **Legal Proceedings**: The case has been transferred to the Xuancheng People's Procuratorate for prosecution, with specific individuals named in the allegations, including charges of bribery and fraud [1] - **Company's Position**: The company is identified as a victim in the embezzlement case, and even if found guilty of unit crime, it would only face fines, with criminal responsibility primarily directed at the responsible individuals [2]