2023年5月6日，公安机关立案侦查。"这些公司的法定代表人多为张某的亲戚朋友，实际经营决策权全 由张某掌控，办公地点集中在三门峡市一间写字楼内，是典型的'一套人马、多块牌子'的空壳公司模 式。"侦查人员通过调取工商注册资料、银行流水、税务抵扣记录等证据，逐步摸清犯罪团伙组织架 构。随后，15名犯罪嫌疑人相继到案。 转自：北京日报客户端 税为国之血脉，依法纳税是每个公民和企业的法定义务。张某等人妄图通过虚开发票钻空子、谋私利， 最终难逃法律惩处。经河南省三门峡市陕州区检察院对张某、袁某等14人非法购买增值税专用发票、非 法出售增值税专用发票案提起公诉，2025年10月，14人分别被法院判处六年至十个月不等的有期徒刑， 部分人员适用缓刑，并处罚金186.4万元，没收违法所得8000万余元。判决生效后，该院同步启动财产 刑执行监督，针对被不起诉人开展行刑反向衔接，督促税务部门依法作出行政处罚，以精准履职守护国 家财税安全。 完税证明露破绽 牵出涉税犯罪网络 2023年5月，陕州区公安局经侦大队查办三门峡某矿业有限公司（下称"矿业公司"）虚开增值税专用发 票案时，矿业公司出具的120万元税收完税证明引起侦查人员的警 ...

Core Viewpoint - Hong Jiu Fruit (06689.HK), once hailed as the "first stock of fruits," is set to be delisted from the Hong Kong Stock Exchange on December 30, marking the end of its journey as a major player in the fruit distribution industry after facing severe financial disclosure issues [1][2]. Group 1: Company Overview - Hong Jiu Fruit was recognized as the largest fruit distributor in China by sales revenue in 2022, particularly dominating the durian and imported dragon fruit markets [4]. - The company was founded by Deng Hong Jiu in 1987 and achieved significant wealth, ranking 85 billion yuan on the Hurun Rich List in 2022 [4]. Group 2: Financial Issues - The company has been suspended from trading since March 2024 due to failure to disclose financial reports, resulting in a market value decline from a peak of 67 billion HKD (approximately 60.3 billion RMB) to 2.795 billion HKD, a drop of over 95% [1][2]. - KPMG, the auditing firm, discovered irregularities, including a prepayment balance of approximately 4.47 billion yuan, with 3.42 billion yuan paid to new suppliers in the fourth quarter, raising concerns about the financial authenticity [2]. Group 3: Governance and Legal Challenges - In April 2024, the chairman Deng Hong Jiu and several board members were taken into custody for alleged loan fraud and issuing false VAT invoices, leading to a collapse in the company's governance structure [2][4]. - Despite attempts to restructure in May 2024, the resignation of three independent non-executive directors rendered the audit committee non-functional, further deteriorating the company's governance [4].

Core Viewpoint - Hongjiu Fruit (06689.HK), once known as the "first fruit stock" in China, is set to be delisted from the Hong Kong Stock Exchange on December 30, following a prolonged suspension of over a year and a half due to failure to disclose financial reports on time [1][2]. Group 1: Company Performance and Financials - Hongjiu Fruit was listed on the Hong Kong Stock Exchange in September 2022, reaching a peak market value of HKD 67 billion (approximately CNY 60.3 billion) [1]. - In its first year of listing, the company reported revenue of CNY 15 billion, which was six times higher than its revenue in 2019, marking a significant achievement in the fruit industry [1]. - By the time of its suspension, the company's stock price had plummeted to HKD 1.74, resulting in a market capitalization of only HKD 2.795 billion, a decline of over 95% from its peak [2]. Group 2: Audit and Financial Irregularities - The company faced scrutiny from its auditor, KPMG, regarding a prepayment balance of approximately CNY 4.47 billion as of the end of 2023, with CNY 3.42 billion paid to several new suppliers lacking historical transaction records [2]. - KPMG resigned as the company's auditor in April 2024, and the company has not disclosed its annual report for 2023 or any subsequent periodic reports [2]. Group 3: Management and Legal Issues - The founder, Deng Hongjiu, along with several executives, were taken into custody in early 2025 due to investigations related to loan fraud and potential issuance of false VAT invoices [4][6]. - Following the suspension of trading and operational disruptions, the company began implementing salary cuts and layoffs, with reports indicating that nearly CNY 60 million from an employee stock ownership plan had been misappropriated [6][7]. - The company filed for restructuring in May 2025, and all independent non-executive directors resigned, leaving the company without any independent oversight [7].

Core Viewpoint - China's tax regulation is shifting from "invoice-based tax management" to "data-driven tax governance," with increased efforts to combat tax-related crimes and enhance compliance [1] Group 1: Tax Crime Trends - Tax-related crimes are evolving with more sophisticated and concealed methods, such as using "yin-yang contracts" for tax evasion and secretly transferring assets to avoid tax liabilities [1] - The emergence of professional and information-driven criminal activities complicates the detection and prosecution of tax crimes [1] Group 2: Judicial Actions and Cases - The Supreme People's Court has released typical cases to guide judicial decisions and strengthen the punishment of tax crimes, aiming to enhance tax compliance [1] - Various cases highlight different methods of tax evasion, including the use of false invoices, "yin-yang contracts," and fraudulent export tax refunds [2] Group 3: Case Summaries - Case 1: Individuals used 880 false VAT invoices to evade taxes amounting to over 23 million yuan, resulting in significant prison sentences [3][4] - Case 2: A real estate company and its manager evaded over 3.86 million yuan in taxes through deceptive practices, leading to fines and imprisonment [6] - Case 3: An individual transferred funds to evade tax collection, resulting in a sentence of three years with a four-year probation [10] - Case 4: A company fraudulently obtained 870 million yuan in export tax refunds through circular exports, leading to a life sentence for the main perpetrator [14] - Case 5: A logistics company sold fake VAT invoices, resulting in a 15-year prison sentence for the owner [17] - Case 6: An individual was sentenced for issuing false VAT invoices to obtain tax refunds, highlighting the need for strict penalties [21] - Case 7: A group used fraudulent methods to claim over 140 million yuan in export tax refunds, resulting in severe penalties [24] - Case 8: A company disguised silver as a different product to fraudulently claim export tax refunds, leading to significant fines and prison time for the responsible individuals [26][28]

Core Viewpoint - The Chinese judicial system is intensifying efforts to combat tax-related crimes, particularly focusing on the transition from traditional tax management to data-driven approaches, highlighting the increasing sophistication of tax evasion methods [1][2]. Group 1: Tax Crime Trends - Tax crime methods are evolving, with new techniques such as "yin-yang contracts" being used to evade taxes, making detection and prosecution more challenging [1][2]. - The judicial system is committed to maintaining tax order and promoting compliance through the prosecution of various tax crimes, including tax evasion and fraudulent tax refunds [2]. Group 2: Case Summaries - Case 1: Individuals used 880 fraudulent VAT invoices to evade taxes amounting to over 23 million yuan, resulting in significant prison sentences [3][4]. - Case 2: A real estate company and its manager evaded over 386,000 yuan in taxes through deceptive practices, leading to fines and imprisonment [6][7]. - Case 3: An individual was sentenced for maliciously evading tax payments totaling over 406,000 yuan by transferring funds to avoid detection [9][10]. - Case 4: A textile company was found guilty of fraudulently claiming 870 million yuan in export tax refunds through circular export practices [12][14]. - Case 5: A logistics company was penalized for illegally selling VAT invoices, resulting in a prison sentence and substantial fines [16][17]. - Case 6: An individual was sentenced for issuing fraudulent VAT invoices, with significant penalties imposed [20][21]. - Case 7: A group was convicted of using false export documentation to claim over 140 million yuan in tax refunds [23][25]. - Case 8: A company was found guilty of misrepresenting silver exports to fraudulently claim tax refunds, resulting in severe penalties [27][28]. Group 3: Legal Implications - The judicial system emphasizes the importance of distinguishing between tax evasion and tax fraud, with different legal consequences based on the nature of the crime [5][11][22]. - The increasing complexity of tax crimes necessitates a robust legal framework to ensure effective prosecution and deterrence [19][26][29].

Core Viewpoint - The announcement from Sierte (002538.SZ) regarding the transfer of a case involving former executives and intermediary personnel to the local prosecutor's office has caused significant concern in the brokerage community [1][5]. Group 1: Case Details - The case involves ten suspects, including former chairman Jin Guoqing and former general manager Jin Zhenghui, with charges including embezzlement, bribery, fraud, and issuing false VAT invoices [5]. - Notably, Sun Bin, a representative from the securities service intermediary, is also implicated and may become the first sponsor representative to be sent for prosecution in 2025 [5]. - The investigation was triggered by internal audits revealing irregularities in the accounts of a subsidiary, leading to a report filed by the company in January 2024 after several executives resigned [5]. Group 2: Financing History - Since its listing in 2011, Sierte has conducted four refinancing activities from 2014 to 2019, all sponsored by Guoyuan Securities [5]. - Sun Bin was involved in two significant financing projects: a private placement raising 1.07 billion yuan in September 2015 and an 800 million yuan convertible bond issuance in 2019 [5]. Group 3: Market Reactions - Sun Bin has been withdrawing from multiple ongoing projects since June 2025, raising market speculation about his status prior to the confirmation of his involvement in the Sierte case [6].

Core Viewpoint - The announcement from Sierte (002538.SZ) regarding the transfer of a case involving former executives and intermediary personnel to the local prosecutor's office has caused significant concern in the brokerage community [1] Group 1: Case Details - The case involves ten suspects, including former chairman Jin Guoqing and former general manager Jin Zhenghui, with charges including embezzlement, bribery, fraud, and issuing false VAT invoices [4][5] - Sun Bin, a representative from Guoyuan Securities, is also implicated and may become the first sponsor representative to be sent for prosecution in 2025 [4][6] Group 2: Financial Background - Sierte has conducted four refinancing projects from 2014 to 2019, all sponsored by Guoyuan Securities, including a private placement raising 1.07 billion yuan in September 2015 and an 800 million yuan convertible bond issuance in 2019 [5] - The investigation was triggered by internal audits revealing irregularities in the accounts of a subsidiary, leading to a report filed by the company in January 2024 [5] Group 3: Implications for Securities Industry - Sun Bin has recently withdrawn from multiple ongoing projects, raising market speculation about his status prior to the case's escalation [6] - The case highlights potential risks associated with the oversight and accountability of securities service intermediaries in financing projects [5][6]

Core Points - The company, Sierte (002538.SZ), has received a notice from the Xuancheng Public Security Bureau regarding the transfer of a case involving former executives suspected of embezzlement and other crimes [1] - The case involves multiple individuals, including former directors and senior management, who are accused of misappropriating substantial company assets and engaging in fraudulent activities [1][2] Summary by Sections - **Criminal Allegations**: The allegations include embezzlement of large sums from the company and its wholly-owned subsidiary, as well as fabricating transactions to misappropriate funds and obtain government subsidies [1] - **Legal Proceedings**: The case has been transferred to the Xuancheng People's Procuratorate for prosecution, with specific individuals named in the allegations, including charges of bribery and fraud [1] - **Company's Position**: The company is identified as a victim in the embezzlement case, and even if found guilty of unit crime, it would only face fines, with criminal responsibility primarily directed at the responsible individuals [2]

Core Viewpoint - The company is facing legal scrutiny due to allegations involving former executives and employees, including serious charges of embezzlement and fraudulent activities related to financial transactions and government subsidies [1][2] Group 1: Allegations and Legal Proceedings - The company received a notice from the public security bureau regarding the transfer of a case for prosecution, involving former directors and senior management accused of embezzling substantial assets from the company and its wholly-owned subsidiary [1] - Allegations include fabricating urea procurement transactions to misappropriate company funds, creating fictitious organic fertilizer sales to reclaim funds, and accepting fraudulent VAT invoices [1] - The company has been identified as a unit involved in the crime of issuing fraudulent VAT invoices, but potential penalties are limited to fines, with criminal responsibility primarily directed at the responsible individuals [2] Group 2: Implications for the Company - The company is considered a victim in the embezzlement case, which may mitigate the severity of penalties it faces if found guilty of unit crimes [2] - Future legal outcomes will depend on the findings of the judicial authorities, which will clarify the facts surrounding the allegations [1]

Group 1 - A case of fraud involving the forgery of legal documents by Zhang, who claimed to assist suspects in obtaining bail, has been uncovered in Zibo, Shandong, with over 1 million yuan defrauded from multiple victims since March 2024 [1][19] - The investigation began when the Zibo Public Security Bureau received leads about a company in Dongying suspected of issuing fraudulent VAT invoices, prompting immediate police action [2] - The actual control of the involved company was identified as Song, who had been issuing fraudulent VAT invoices for over 160 companies across more than 10 provinces since 2022, amounting to over 300 million yuan, resulting in a tax loss of over 40 million yuan to the state [4][19] Group 2 - During the investigation, Song fled but was later captured in January 2024, where he claimed his case had already been resolved by law enforcement [6] - Song presented three forged legal documents to the police, which were later identified as fake through detailed comparison with authentic documents, revealing multiple discrepancies [8][9] - The forgeries included two documents from the Zibo police and one from the Taiyuan procuratorate, with notable errors in document numbers and seals [11][19] Group 3 - Song admitted to obtaining the forged documents from Zhang, who he believed had connections to high-ranking officials, after initially being skeptical of Zhang's claims [13][14] - Zhang exploited the vulnerabilities of individuals seeking to evade legal consequences, successfully defrauding multiple victims, including Song, out of over 1 million yuan through various schemes [19][20] - The police have issued a warning to the public about the risks of trusting individuals who claim to have connections to reduce legal penalties, emphasizing that legal documents are processed through official channels [20]