Workflow
预付式消费维权
icon
Search documents
总部人去楼空,连锁机构全国多地闭店,员工被欠多月工资,半月前曾称一切正常
目前,在互联网平台上搜索"卓跃儿童运动馆",有不少学生家长选择发视频维权。在郑州家长们的维权视频的评论区里,也有来自北京通州、河南洛阳、 山西太原等地的家长表示当地的卓跃儿童运动馆也出现了类似情况。 近日,关于全国连锁的卓跃儿童运动馆深陷"爆雷"危机、多地门店老板跑路的消息引发行业震动。 门店集体关闭的背后,品牌运营方——郑州贝体体育公司已人去楼空。 大门紧锁,未退费金额超700万元 半月前曾称"一切正常" 7月12日,河南新郑卓跃儿童运动馆龙湖锦艺城店率先被媒体爆出突然闭店,家长开始维权。7月14日,品牌运营主体"郑州贝体体育科技有限公司"在公众 号发声明否认"跑路",称闭店是"盟商投资人自主决定",全国400余家门店"均保持正常教学"。 卓跃儿童运动馆官方声明 尊敬的卓跃会员家长: 卓跃儿童运动馆衷心感谢您长期以来的信任与支持。 近期郑州个别门店因盟商投资人的闭店决定,给相关会员家长带来了困扰和担忧, 对此,卓跃儿童运动馆高度关注并深表歉意。 事件发生后,卓跃儿童运动馆第一时间沟通投资人了解情况,并快速成立专项工作 小组,全力解决闭店后续问题: 【会员复课保障小组】积极协调资源,全力组织安排受影响会员在卓 ...
总部人去楼空,连锁机构全国多地闭店,员工被欠多月工资,半月前曾称一切正常
21世纪经济报道· 2025-08-01 08:17
大象新闻视频截图 目前,在互联网平台上搜索"卓跃儿童运动馆",有不少学生家长选择发视频维权。在郑州家长 们的维权视频的评论区里,也有来自北京通州、河南洛阳、山西太原等地的家长表示当地的卓 跃儿童运动馆也出现了类似情况。 门店集体关闭的背后,品牌运营方——郑州贝体体育公司已人去楼空。 4:40 @s Villan (1/27) 2 近日,关于全国连锁的卓跃儿童运动馆深陷"爆雷"危机、多地门店老板跑路的消息引发行业震 动。 N * * * * * * * √ 股权流结 © 企音查 ··· 共 1 条股权冻结 (2025) 粤0113财保2563号 被执行人:李晓冬 冻结股权标的企业:郑州贝体体育科技有限公司 股权数额:34.64352万元人民币 执行法院:广东省广州市番禺区人民法院 类型:股权冻结 状态: 冻结 冻结起止日期:2025-06-12 至 2027-06-11 公示日期:2025-06-12 卓跃老板已被冻结股权。 大门紧锁,未退费金额超700万元 半月前曾称"一切正常" 7月12日,河南新郑卓跃儿童运动馆龙湖锦艺城店率先被媒体爆出突然闭店,家长开始维权。7 月14日,品牌运营主体"郑州贝体体育科技有 ...
一问到底丨预付式消费司法解释实施 如何保护消费者权益?
Yang Shi Wang· 2025-05-01 16:08
Group 1 - The Supreme People's Court has implemented a judicial interpretation regarding prepaid consumption, providing consumers with new rights to protect themselves against businesses that close suddenly or refuse refunds [1] - Consumers are advised to gather essential information about businesses, such as their name, address, and contact details, to facilitate future claims [2][7] - If a business closes and consumers cannot locate them, they can seek compensation from the venue owner if the venue failed to verify the business's qualifications [3] Group 2 - Consumers have the right to request refunds under specific conditions, including when businesses fail to provide agreed-upon services or relocate without consent [4] - Refund calculations differ based on the reason for the refund; if the business is at fault, consumers may receive a higher refund amount compared to refunds requested for personal reasons [5] - Businesses cannot impose excessive fees for refunds, and consumers can refuse such charges while seeking assistance from consumer protection organizations [6] Group 3 - Consumers should retain evidence such as contracts, payment receipts, and business licenses to support their claims [7] - Alternative dispute resolution methods, such as filing complaints with consumer associations or market regulatory bodies, are available for consumers who wish to avoid litigation [8] - The new judicial interpretation applies only to contracts signed after May 1, 2023, while contracts signed before this date are governed by existing laws [9]