Workflow
健身卡
icon
Search documents
健身房不跑路才奇怪了
半佛仙人· 2025-08-11 03:50
这是半佛仙人的第1854篇原创 1 后台有人发我一图,说威尔仕这么多年的健身房老牌子,也顶不住了。 我一搜,确实好像不太行了。 (新闻截图来自济南日报新黄河) 我办过5张健身房的卡,他们唯一的共同之处就是都跑路了。 跑路,证明人家确实日常有练,不然还跑不动呢。 健身房跑路是非常正常的一件事情。 就算是乐刻,也经常出现具体门店不行了关了,只不过是由于他们门店多,且会员基本通用,显得好像没事儿一样。 但底色都是一回事儿。 问题来了,为啥健身房的归宿是跑路? 因为这东西反人性啊。 我很认可健身的价值,也很认可人类可贵的品质就是对抗本能,但这里就出现了非常尴尬的两件事。 第一,绝大多数人是没有能力对抗本能的。 第二,假如你是这万里挑一的自控力强劲的人,你想让自己变得更健康,想有一个好身材,你并不一定需要去健身房呀,更不一定需要 请私教。 食谱各大网站都烂大街了,锻炼方法从书籍到视频应有尽有,只要你能坚持,一样可以起到效果,因为重点在于毅力不在于方法。 你努力,和健身房有啥关系? 2 你不需要掏钱啊。 而当你坚持到一定程度之后,或许会有进一步被专业指导的需求,这时候,你才算是一个典型的硬核健身用户。 而这样的人,数量太 ...
一问到底丨预付式消费司法解释实施 如何保护消费者权益?
Yang Shi Wang· 2025-05-01 16:08
Group 1 - The Supreme People's Court has implemented a judicial interpretation regarding prepaid consumption, providing consumers with new rights to protect themselves against businesses that close suddenly or refuse refunds [1] - Consumers are advised to gather essential information about businesses, such as their name, address, and contact details, to facilitate future claims [2][7] - If a business closes and consumers cannot locate them, they can seek compensation from the venue owner if the venue failed to verify the business's qualifications [3] Group 2 - Consumers have the right to request refunds under specific conditions, including when businesses fail to provide agreed-upon services or relocate without consent [4] - Refund calculations differ based on the reason for the refund; if the business is at fault, consumers may receive a higher refund amount compared to refunds requested for personal reasons [5] - Businesses cannot impose excessive fees for refunds, and consumers can refuse such charges while seeking assistance from consumer protection organizations [6] Group 3 - Consumers should retain evidence such as contracts, payment receipts, and business licenses to support their claims [7] - Alternative dispute resolution methods, such as filing complaints with consumer associations or market regulatory bodies, are available for consumers who wish to avoid litigation [8] - The new judicial interpretation applies only to contracts signed after May 1, 2023, while contracts signed before this date are governed by existing laws [9]