Group 1 - The core viewpoint is that the pre-prepared food industry is gaining attention due to consumer acceptance and government support, but transparency and safety concerns need to be addressed [1][2] - The 2023 Central Document emphasizes the development of the pre-prepared food industry, indicating a positive direction for growth [1] - There is a significant issue of information asymmetry where consumers are unaware of the true nature of pre-prepared food being sold as freshly made [1][2] Group 2 - Ensuring the safety and health of pre-prepared food relies on technological and management innovations in production, preservation, and transportation [2] - The fast-paced lifestyle of consumers creates a demand for pre-prepared food that is quick, stable in taste, and hygienic [2] - The market for pre-prepared food can expand significantly if safety standards are maintained and a balance between convenience and taste is achieved [2] Group 3 - The relationship between pre-prepared food and freshly cooked meals is not mutually exclusive; both types of offerings should coexist to meet diverse consumer preferences [2] - Consumers will ultimately determine the market dynamics through their purchasing choices, with acceptable brand premiums but unsustainable high prices likely to fail [2]

Core Viewpoint - The ongoing dispute between Xi Bei and Luo Yonghao regarding the use of pre-prepared dishes has escalated, prompting a call for a live dialogue to clarify the situation and promote healthy development in the pre-prepared food industry in China [2][4]. Group 1 - Luo Yonghao suggested a live dialogue on a major online platform to address the controversy and clarify whether Xi Bei uses pre-prepared dishes [2][5]. - Xi Bei's founder, Jia Guolong, acknowledged his previous handling of the situation was incorrect and stated that Xi Bei will adopt a transparent approach moving forward, learning from Pang Donglai [3][5]. - Jia Guolong referred to Luo Yonghao as a "network black mouth" and "network underworld," but also recognized that Luo's actions have inadvertently helped Xi Bei improve [3][5].

Core Viewpoint - The dialogue between Luo Yonghao and Jia Guolong regarding the use of pre-prepared dishes by Xibei is marked by miscommunication, and a live broadcast is proposed to clarify the situation and promote healthy development in the prepared food industry in China [1]. Group 1 - Luo Yonghao suggests a live broadcast on a major online platform for a fair and rational dialogue between both parties [1]. - The proposed dialogue aims to clarify whether Xibei uses pre-prepared dishes, addressing public concerns [1]. - The initiative is seen as a potential contribution to the healthy development of the prepared food industry and the broader restaurant sector in China [1].

Group 1 - The core of the debate revolves around the use of pre-made dishes by Xibei Restaurant, with founder Jia Guolong labeling Luo Yonghao as a "black mouth" and "black society" on social media [1][4][10] - Luo Yonghao proposed a live dialogue on a major online platform to clarify the truth about Xibei's use of pre-made dishes and contribute to the healthy development of the pre-made dish industry and the restaurant sector in China [2][3] - Jia Guolong acknowledged his previous response was incorrect and stated that Xibei will now operate transparently and learn from Pang Donglai [8][9]

Core Viewpoint - The ongoing debate between Luo Yonghao and the restaurant chain Xibei regarding "pre-made dishes" has led to significant financial repercussions for Xibei, with a reported daily revenue drop of 1 million yuan following Luo's comments, escalating to an estimated 2-3 million yuan per day thereafter [1][4]. Group 1: Financial Impact - Xibei's daily revenue decreased by 1 million yuan on September 10 and 11, with projections of a further decline to 2-3 million yuan starting September 12 [1]. - The controversy has resulted in a noticeable drop in customer traffic for Xibei [1]. Group 2: Industry Reactions - Prominent figures in the restaurant industry have expressed support for Xibei, emphasizing the challenges faced by businesses and the importance of constructive criticism rather than damaging accusations [4]. - Luo Yonghao's comments have sparked a broader discussion about the transparency of pre-made dishes in the restaurant industry, with calls for legislative action to protect consumer rights [4][8]. Group 3: Legal and Regulatory Aspects - Legal opinions suggest that Xibei's use of certain pre-made ingredients may violate existing regulations, raising concerns about potential false advertising [5]. - A draft national standard for pre-made dishes is set to be publicly reviewed, which could standardize definitions and disclosure requirements for restaurants [6][7]. Group 4: Consumer Awareness - Luo Yonghao has stated that while he does not oppose pre-made dishes, consumers have the right to know whether restaurants use them, advocating for greater transparency in the industry [9]. - The debate highlights a disconnect between consumer expectations for freshness and the reality of industrial food processing methods used by some restaurants [10].