出口骗税涉及生产、贸易、报关、物流、收汇等多个环节，常具跨区域、跨境内外的特点，隐蔽性强， 查处难度大。税务、公安等八部门持续深化协作，健全常态化打击虚开骗税违法犯罪工作机制，构建起 从行政执法到刑事司法的全链条、一体化打击体系。数据显示，2025年，八部门常态化联合打击涉税违 法犯罪工作机制作用进一步发挥，累计检查涉嫌虚开骗税企业7.6万户，挽回出口退税损失超100亿元。 从曝光案件看，有的企业将不可退税的化肥产品"变名"为可退税工业化学产品，伪报品名企图逃避监 管；有的企业虚开发票伪造虚假进项，再非法匹配真实出口货物信息，营造"票货一致"假象；还有企业 叠加使用虚开发票、虚假购销、低值高报、虚假结汇等多重手段，编织看似严密的骗税网络。 税务部门对涉案者依法作出相应处罚。其中，对天津三家涉案企业追缴骗取出口退税款2.01亿元(人民 币，下同)，三年内停止为其办理出口退税。 中新社北京2月27日电 (记者 赵建华)中国国家税务总局27日集中曝光4起骗取出口退税违法案件，涉及 天津、黑龙江、贵州、重庆等地。 西南政法大学税务硕士教育中心副主任廖明月指出，不法分子直接窃取国家税款，扭曲了政策制定初 衷。部分违法主 ...

2月27日，记者从国家税务总局获悉，天津、黑龙江、贵州、重庆等地多部门联合依法查处并曝光4起骗 取出口退税违法案件。 2025年3月，税务部门依据《中华人民共和国税收征收管理法》等相关法律法规规定，对上述3户企业追 缴骗取出口退税款2.01亿元，三年内停止为其办理出口退税。目前，杨荣栋等6人因涉嫌骗取出口退税 罪等由天津市滨海新区人民检察院向天津市第三中级人民法院、天津市滨海新区人民法院提起公诉。 国家税务总局驻沈阳稽查局联合黑龙江省税务公安等部门依法查处以刘敬伟为实际控制人的7户企业骗 取出口退税案件。 经查，2020年至2023年，以刘敬伟为实际控制人的牡丹江浩玮智能家具有限公司等7户企业，通过虚开 农产品发票，采取买单配票等违法手段骗取出口退税。 2024年2月，税务部门依据《中华人民共和国税收征收管理法》等相关法律法规规定，对牡丹江浩玮智 能家具有限公司等7户企业追缴骗取出口退税款6697.45万元，三年内停止为其办理出口退税。2025年10 月，齐齐哈尔市铁锋区人民法院对该案作出判决，主犯刘敬伟因犯骗取出口退税罪，被判处有期徒刑十 五年并处罚金；其余12名从犯分别被判处有期徒刑二年零十个月至十二年并 ...

一、天津市税务公安等部门联合依法查处以杨荣栋为实际控制人的3户出口企业骗取出口退税案件。 三、贵州省遵义市税务公安等部门联合依法查处赤水汇达丰商贸有限公司骗取出口退税案件。 经查，2020年至2022年，以杨荣栋为实际控制人的天津市润兴泰供应链管理服务有限公司、天津益鼎沣 供应链管理服务有限公司、天津浩丰鼎业供应链管理服务有限公司，通过签订虚假买卖合同、购买他人 出口货物报关单信息、接受上游企业虚开增值税专用发票等违法手段骗取出口退税。2025年3月，税务 部门依法对上述3户企业追缴骗取出口退税款2.01亿元，三年内停止为其办理出口退税。目前，杨荣栋 等6人因涉嫌骗取出口退税罪等由天津市滨海新区人民检察院向天津市第三中级人民法院、天津市滨海 新区人民法院提起公诉。 二、国家税务总局驻沈阳稽查局联合黑龙江省税务公安等部门依法查处以刘敬伟为实际控制人的7户企 业骗取出口退税案件。 经查，2020年至2023年，以刘敬伟为实际控制人的牡丹江浩玮智能家具有限公司等7户企业，通过虚开 农产品发票，采取买单配票等违法手段骗取出口退税。2024年2月，税务部门依法对牡丹江浩玮智能家 具有限公司等7户企业追缴骗取出口退税款6 ...

Core Viewpoint - The final ruling on a tax fraud case involving Jiangsu Wuzhong and its subsidiary, Wuzhong Import and Export Co., has been announced, confirming the company's ongoing financial and operational challenges, including an impending delisting from the stock market [1][2]. Group 1: Tax Fraud Case - Jiangsu Wuzhong's subsidiary, Wuzhong Import and Export, was found guilty of tax fraud, resulting in a fine of 8 million yuan and a prison sentence of 3 years and 6 months for the company's former chairman, Yang Feng [1]. - The fraudulent activities occurred from July 2011 to December 2018, during which the company illegally obtained approximately 242 million yuan in export tax rebates and profited over 16 million yuan through service fees [4]. - The case revealed that Wuzhong Import and Export disguised its operations to facilitate tax fraud, significantly impacting its financial performance, as evidenced by a drastic profit drop from 14.67 million yuan in 2018 to just 180,600 yuan in 2019 [5]. Group 2: Company Delisting - Jiangsu Wuzhong is facing delisting due to continuous financial fraud and misuse of funds, with the last trading day expected to be December 29, 2025 [2]. - The company has been under scrutiny for failing to disclose its actual controlling shareholders, which has compounded its legal and financial troubles [7]. - Despite the ongoing legal issues, Jiangsu Wuzhong claims that the court ruling will not affect its normal business operations [1].

Core Viewpoint - A tax fraud case involving Jiangsu Wuzhong and its subsidiary has reached a final verdict, with significant implications for the company's future and ongoing operations [1][2]. Group 1: Legal Proceedings and Verdict - Jiangsu Wuzhong's wholly-owned subsidiary, Wuzhong Import and Export Co., received a final ruling from the Hunan Province Hengyang Intermediate People's Court, upholding the original judgment [1]. - The first-instance judgment revealed that Wuzhong Import and Export was found guilty of tax fraud, resulting in a fine of 8 million yuan, and the former legal representative, Yang Feng, was sentenced to 3 years and 6 months in prison along with a fine of 123,000 yuan [1][4]. - The court also ordered the confiscation of illegal gains amounting to 16 million yuan, which had been seized by law enforcement [1]. Group 2: Financial Implications and Company Operations - Jiangsu Wuzhong announced that the verdict would not affect its normal business operations, stating that the company's current operational status remains stable [1]. - The tax fraud case spanned from July 2011 to December 2018, during which Wuzhong Import and Export fraudulently obtained approximately 242 million yuan in export tax rebates [4]. - The company had previously reported a significant drop in profits from Wuzhong Import and Export, with a 98.77% decrease in 2019 compared to 2018, which was later linked to the fraudulent activities [5]. Group 3: Company’s Listing Status and Investor Rights - Jiangsu Wuzhong is facing delisting, with only six trading days remaining before its stock enters a delisting period, expected to conclude on December 29, 2025 [2][7]. - Despite the impending delisting, investors who purchased shares between April 20, 2019, and February 26, 2025, retain the right to claim compensation for losses incurred [6][7]. - The company is under scrutiny for financial misconduct, including inflated revenues exceeding 1.7 billion yuan over four years, which has led to potential legal repercussions for its current management [6].

Core Viewpoint - Jiangsu Wuzhong (SH600200) is facing a final ruling on a tax fraud case involving its wholly-owned subsidiary, which has implications for its impending delisting due to financial misconduct and related issues [2][3]. Group 1: Legal Proceedings - Jiangsu Wuzhong's subsidiary, Wuzhong Import and Export Co., received a final ruling from the Hunan Province Hengyang Intermediate People's Court, upholding a previous judgment that found it guilty of tax fraud, resulting in a fine of 8 million yuan [2]. - The former legal representative and chairman of Wuzhong Import and Export, Yang Feng, was sentenced to 3 years and 6 months in prison and fined 123,000 yuan for his role in the fraud [2][6]. - The court ordered the confiscation of 16 million yuan in illegal gains from the subsidiary, which will be turned over to the national treasury [2]. Group 2: Company Operations and Financial Impact - Jiangsu Wuzhong announced that the legal ruling will not affect its normal business operations, stating that the company's current operational status remains normal [2]. - The company is in the process of delisting, with its stock entering a delisting preparation period on December 9, 2025, and the last trading day expected to be December 29, 2025 [3]. - The tax fraud case spanned from July 2011 to December 2018, during which the subsidiary allegedly defrauded approximately 242 million yuan in export tax rebates [6]. Group 3: Financial Performance and Irregularities - In 2018, Wuzhong Import and Export reported a profit of 14.67 million yuan, but this figure plummeted to only 180,600 yuan in 2019, a decrease of 98.77%, raising concerns about the legitimacy of its financial reporting [7]. - The fraudulent activities were linked to a network of related transactions that inflated revenues by over 1.7 billion yuan over four years, involving the current controlling shareholders of Jiangsu Wuzhong [8]. Group 4: Investor Implications - Investors who purchased shares between April 20, 2019, and February 26, 2025, and incurred losses after the stock's delisting can claim compensation from Jiangsu Wuzhong [9]. - The company’s stock will be delisted and transferred to the National Equities Exchange and Quotations system after the delisting period, but the ability of investors to recover losses may be complicated by the company's financial condition [9].

Core Viewpoint - A tax fraud case involving Jiangsu Wuzhong and its subsidiary has reached a final verdict, coinciding with the company's impending delisting due to financial misconduct [2][6]. Group 1: Legal Proceedings - Jiangsu Wuzhong's wholly-owned subsidiary, Jiangsu Wuzhong Import and Export Co., received a final ruling from the Hunan Hengyang Intermediate People's Court, upholding the original judgment that found it guilty of tax fraud, imposing a fine of 8 million yuan [1]. - The former legal representative and chairman of Jiangsu Wuzhong Import and Export, Yang Feng, was sentenced to 3 years and 6 months in prison and fined 123,000 yuan for his role in the fraud [1][4]. - The fraudulent activities spanned from July 2011 to December 2018, resulting in approximately 242 million yuan in export tax refunds obtained through illegal means [4]. Group 2: Financial Impact and Company Operations - Jiangsu Wuzhong's stock is set to enter a delisting period, with the last trading day expected to be December 29, 2025, due to continuous financial fraud and misuse of funds [2][6]. - Despite the legal issues, Jiangsu Wuzhong stated that the judgment would not affect its normal business operations, and the company is currently functioning normally [1][2]. - The subsidiary's profits were significantly inflated due to the fraudulent activities, with a notable drop in profits from 14.67 million yuan in 2018 to just 180,600 yuan in 2019, a decrease of 98.77% [5]. Group 3: Investor Implications - Investors who purchased Jiangsu Wuzhong's stock between April 20, 2019, and February 26, 2025, may have the right to claim compensation for losses incurred after the company's delisting [6][7]. - The delisting process will not affect investors' rights to seek compensation, although it may complicate the recovery of funds due to the company's financial condition [7].

Core Viewpoint - The case of Wenzhou Changhao International Trade Co., Ltd. involved fraudulent export tax refunds amounting to 19.6792 million yuan through the issuance of false VAT invoices without actual goods transactions [1][2][3]. Group 1: Fraudulent Activities - Wenzhou Changhao International Trade Co., Ltd. engaged in fraudulent activities by paying fees to 12 upstream companies to issue 1,528 false VAT invoices, resulting in the illegal acquisition of export tax refunds [1][2]. - The company reported an unusually high foreign exchange settlement amount of 82.7 million yuan from June 2015 to December 2017, with no corresponding shipping expenses [3]. - The company’s financial records showed a total payment of 300 million yuan for goods from June 2015 to August 2023, while only 2.15 million yuan was spent on shipping and agency fees, significantly lower than industry averages [3]. Group 2: Investigation and Evidence - A joint task force comprising tax authorities, police, and banking officials was formed to investigate the case, tracing over 1,700 invoices and identifying a pattern of concentrated invoice issuance from upstream companies [4]. - The investigation revealed that the upstream companies had a close relationship, with the same financial personnel managing multiple entities, indicating potential collusion in issuing false invoices [4]. - The task force uncovered a total of 160 million yuan in fraudulent funds and identified the main perpetrator, Zhou, and 12 upstream companies involved in the scheme [4]. Group 3: Legal Consequences - The legal actions taken against Wenzhou Changhao International Trade Co., Ltd. included the recovery of 1.3507 million yuan in tax and penalties, along with a fine of 20 million yuan imposed by the court [5]. - Zhou, the legal representative of the company, was sentenced to ten years and three months in prison and fined 1.2 million yuan for his role in the fraudulent activities [5]. - The tax authorities emphasized their commitment to combating tax fraud and maintaining tax order to ensure national tax security [1][5].

Core Viewpoint - The Chinese judicial system is intensifying efforts to combat tax-related crimes, particularly focusing on the transition from traditional tax management to data-driven approaches, highlighting the increasing sophistication of tax evasion methods [1][2]. Group 1: Tax Crime Trends - Tax crime methods are evolving, with new techniques such as "yin-yang contracts" being used to evade taxes, making detection and prosecution more challenging [1][2]. - The judicial system is committed to maintaining tax order and promoting compliance through the prosecution of various tax crimes, including tax evasion and fraudulent tax refunds [2]. Group 2: Case Summaries - Case 1: Individuals used 880 fraudulent VAT invoices to evade taxes amounting to over 23 million yuan, resulting in significant prison sentences [3][4]. - Case 2: A real estate company and its manager evaded over 386,000 yuan in taxes through deceptive practices, leading to fines and imprisonment [6][7]. - Case 3: An individual was sentenced for maliciously evading tax payments totaling over 406,000 yuan by transferring funds to avoid detection [9][10]. - Case 4: A textile company was found guilty of fraudulently claiming 870 million yuan in export tax refunds through circular export practices [12][14]. - Case 5: A logistics company was penalized for illegally selling VAT invoices, resulting in a prison sentence and substantial fines [16][17]. - Case 6: An individual was sentenced for issuing fraudulent VAT invoices, with significant penalties imposed [20][21]. - Case 7: A group was convicted of using false export documentation to claim over 140 million yuan in tax refunds [23][25]. - Case 8: A company was found guilty of misrepresenting silver exports to fraudulently claim tax refunds, resulting in severe penalties [27][28]. Group 3: Legal Implications - The judicial system emphasizes the importance of distinguishing between tax evasion and tax fraud, with different legal consequences based on the nature of the crime [5][11][22]. - The increasing complexity of tax crimes necessitates a robust legal framework to ensure effective prosecution and deterrence [19][26][29].

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the "three false" tax-related illegal activities, emphasizing the importance of compliance in business operations to avoid legal repercussions and maintain market order [2][3][4]. Group 1: Definition of "Three False" Tax-Related Illegal Activities - "Three false" tax-related illegal activities include: - "Fake enterprises" that exist solely to issue false invoices without actual business operations [5]. - "Fake exports" where companies fabricate export activities to fraudulently claim export tax refunds [9]. - "Fake declarations" involving false reporting to illegally obtain tax benefits or evade taxes [10]. Group 2: Characteristics of "Three False" Tax-Related Illegal Activities - Characteristics of fake enterprises include: - Established in regions with tax incentives or lax tax supervision, lacking real business operations and necessary staff [14]. - Abnormal financial activities, such as issuing false invoices and creating fictitious transaction records [14]. - Fake exports are characterized by: - No actual export activities, using forged customs information and purchasing invoices to claim refunds [9]. - Fake declarations involve: - Fabricating documents to obtain tax reductions or using dual contracts to inflate costs [10]. Group 3: Penalties for "Three False" Tax-Related Illegal Activities - Penalties for fake enterprises include: - Administrative fines ranging from 5,000 to 500,000 yuan based on the amount of false invoices issued [18]. - Criminal penalties for serious offenses, including imprisonment and fines based on the amount of tax fraudulently claimed [19]. - For fake exports, penalties include: - Recovery of fraudulently claimed tax amounts and fines ranging from 1 to 5 times the amount [22]. - For fake declarations, penalties involve: - Recovery of taxes owed plus fines ranging from 0.5 to 5 times the amount evaded [28]. Group 4: Recommendations for Businesses - Companies should establish robust invoice management systems to ensure proper issuance and use of invoices [32]. - It is crucial to verify supplier qualifications to ensure legitimate transactions and legal invoice sources [32]. - Businesses must maintain clear and accurate financial records to prevent fraudulent practices [32]. - Export companies should adhere strictly to export tax refund regulations to ensure the legality of their operations [32]. - Continuous education on tax regulations and cooperation with tax authorities is essential for compliance [33].