在美联储降息、通胀压力缓和以及劳动力市场放缓的共同推动下，债券市场有望以近五年来最佳表现为 2025年画上句号。不过，多位市场人士提醒，进入2026年后，债券的回报空间可能不及今年。 智通财经获悉，数据显示，截至周四，美国综合债券指数2025年累计回报已超过7%。该指数覆盖美国 国债、政府相关债券、公司债以及抵押贷款支持证券和资产支持证券。相比之下，该指数在2024年的回 报率仅为1.25%，2023年为5.5%。这一轮反弹发生在债券投资者仍努力走出历史性低谷之后，2022年， 美联储为遏制通胀实施近40年来最快的加息周期，导致该指数当年下跌逾13%，创下有记录以来最差表 现。 尽管债券价格此后收复了部分失地，市场普遍认为，2025年的强劲势头未必能够完全延续到2026年。一 方面，部分投资者对美联储在2026年能否继续大幅降息持怀疑态度；另一方面，美国国债收益率今年已 明显下行，使得当前入场买入债券的价格吸引力下降。由于债券价格与收益率呈反向关系，收益率下行 意味着价格已被推高。 以10年期美国国债收益率为例，这一影响房贷、汽车贷款、公司融资成本以及政府借款成本的重要基准 收益率，已从今年1月的约4.58% ...

Core Viewpoint - The article argues that simpler investment strategies, such as the classic "60/40 portfolio" (60% stocks and 40% bonds), often outperform more complex alternatives, highlighting the limitations of human predictive abilities in investing [2][4][5]. Group 1: Performance Comparison - Over the past 25 years, the "60/40 portfolio" achieved an annualized return of 6.89%, while Bridgewater's "All Weather Portfolio" returned only 6.49% [2] - Other complex strategies, such as the "Permanent Portfolio" (equally divided among stocks, bonds, commodities, and cash), yielded a lower annualized return of 4.45% [2] - A "30/70 portfolio" (30% stocks and 70% bonds) also underperformed with a 5.55% annualized return over the same period [2] Group 2: Institutional Investor Insights - Research tracking public pension funds and university endowments from 2008 to 2023 revealed that public pensions had an average annualized return of 6.88%, while a market index portfolio could have achieved 7.84% [3] - University endowment funds also returned around 6.88%, while a market index portfolio would have yielded 9.27% during the same period [3] - The difference in returns, although seemingly small at 1-2 percentage points annually, accumulates significantly over decades, suggesting that complex asset allocations have hindered long-term performance [3] Group 3: Investment Philosophy - The article emphasizes that the market's inherent complexity and uncertainty make it difficult for investors to predict outcomes accurately, leading to higher costs and lower returns when pursuing complex strategies [4] - The "60/40 portfolio" embodies a fundamental asset allocation philosophy, balancing risk and return effectively over time [4] - The article suggests that rather than seeking intricate strategies, investors should focus on controlling costs, diversifying, and adhering to key investment principles for long-term success [4][5]