防止AI造谣，源头治理是关键。生成合成服务提供者要强化技术的安全性和合规性，在算法设计阶段 就应嵌入伦理约束，管理好训练语料，做到清晰标识。互联网应用程序分发平台也要不断升级审核体 系，提高对深度伪造内容的检测精度，在借助AI治理谣言的同时，完善人工复核机制弥补算法短板。 谣言止于智者，更止于法治。9月1日起，《人工智能生成合成内容标识办法》施行。《互联网信息服务 深度合成管理规定》《生成式人工智能服务管理暂行办法》等规定也已相继出台。下一步要继续填补法 律空白，与时俱进完善细化规范AI技术应用的法律法规，加强法规执行，为制作传播生成合成内容的 相关主体划定法律的红线。 AI谣言的治理并非一日之功，要以技术制衡技术、以责任锁住风险。在信息生成到传播的全链条中， 包括大模型开发者、互联网应用程序分发平台、使用者等都应各负其责。相关监管部门应在延续已有网 络虚假信息处理机制基础上进行重点监测。源头严防、过程严管、违规严惩，才能有效消除AI谣言滋 生的土壤。（完） 近日，网上接连出现多起虚构突发事件、编造公共政策、捏造社会民生领域谣言等案件，引发社会广泛 关注。多地公安机关通报显示，一些不法分子为博眼球蹭热度、吸粉 ...

Core Viewpoint - The rise of generative artificial intelligence (AIGC) has led to concerns about AI-generated misinformation flooding the internet, with platforms like Douyin (TikTok) taking steps to address this issue through new features like "AI Douyin Truth" [1][3]. Group 1: AI and Misinformation - The phenomenon of "AI pollution" on the internet has become a widely accepted notion among users, highlighting the challenges posed by AI-generated content [1]. - Douyin has launched the "AI Douyin Truth" feature to help users identify misleading content and access accurate information, resulting in a 67% decrease in the exposure of rumors since July [3][10]. - The feature utilizes a "rumor governance model" and a dedicated team to actively review trending content for potential misinformation, enhancing the platform's ability to combat false narratives [3][10]. Group 2: Limitations and Challenges - Despite its advancements, "AI Douyin Truth" is not a comprehensive solution, as it may still produce inaccuracies and lacks complete coverage [5]. - The platform's reliance on authoritative sources for content verification means that it may struggle with new or emerging rumors that have not been previously documented [10]. - The ongoing challenge for content platforms is balancing the benefits of AIGC in diversifying content with the risks of low-quality AI-generated material contaminating their ecosystems [5][8].

Core Viewpoint - Douyin has launched the "AI Douyin Truth" feature to combat misinformation and rumors, marking a significant step in its governance strategy for 2025, with a reported 67% decrease in rumor exposure over the past quarter [1][3]. Group 1: AI Rumor Governance - The "AI Douyin Truth" feature aims to provide users with fact-checking and clarification against misleading content and rumors [1][2]. - The platform has previously implemented various practices, such as operating the "Douyin Debunking" account and establishing a media debunking team, to create a content ecosystem focused on debunking [3]. - The introduction of large model capabilities enhances the platform's ability to identify and manage rumors more effectively, transitioning from passive to proactive governance [3][4]. Group 2: Responsibilities and Collaboration - Platforms like Douyin have a responsibility to act as information gatekeepers, ensuring a healthier content ecosystem for users [2]. - Effective governance of AI rumors requires collaboration across society, including regulatory bodies improving legal frameworks and media organizations actively addressing misinformation [4]. - The ultimate goal is to move towards a collaborative governance model that involves multiple stakeholders, ensuring that AI-generated misinformation has no safe haven [4].

Core Viewpoint - Douyin has launched the "AI Douyin Truth-Seeking" feature to combat misinformation and rumors, marking a significant step in its governance strategy for 2025, with a reported 67% decrease in rumor exposure over the past quarter [1][3]. Group 1: AI Douyin Truth-Seeking Feature - The "AI Douyin Truth-Seeking" feature aims to provide users with fact-checking and clarification against misleading content and rumors [1][2]. - The platform has previously implemented various initiatives, such as operating the "Douyin Debunking" account and establishing a media debunking team, to create a content ecosystem focused on debunking [3]. Group 2: Importance of Platform Responsibility - Platforms like Douyin have a responsibility to act as information gatekeepers, enhancing their technical defenses to protect user rights and foster a healthier content ecosystem [2][4]. - The introduction of advanced technologies and proactive measures signifies a shift from reactive to proactive governance of AI-related misinformation [3][4]. Group 3: Collaborative Efforts Required - Addressing AI rumors requires a collective effort from various stakeholders, including regulatory bodies, media, and the public, to establish a comprehensive governance framework [4]. - The need for continuous improvement in legal regulations and cross-platform information sharing mechanisms is emphasized to effectively combat the rapid spread of AI-generated misinformation [4].

Group 1 - The core issue of "AI rumors" presents new challenges for government regulators, internet platforms, technology developers, and society as a whole, requiring improved technology and regulatory frameworks for effective governance [1] - Legal frameworks related to AI are being continuously improved, with recent regulations providing clear legal boundaries for AI users and platform managers, enhancing the deterrent effect against illegal activities [2][3] - The difficulty in collecting evidence for "AI rumor" cases necessitates the establishment of a system tailored to the characteristics of AI technology for evidence collection and recognition [3] Group 2 - Internet platforms are urged to take proactive measures to govern "AI rumors" by promptly removing or debunking false information, especially during significant events or sensitive topics [4] - Establishing convenient reporting channels for users to report suspected rumors is essential, and repeat offenders may face bans to regulate user behavior [5] - Enhancing technical capabilities through algorithms, big data analysis, and blockchain technology can aid in identifying and blocking the spread of rumors [5] Group 3 - Increasing public awareness and legal consciousness is crucial to prevent unintentional dissemination of "AI rumors," as individuals may unknowingly share AI-generated content that could mislead others [8] - Media platforms and self-media practitioners are encouraged to improve content verification capabilities and ensure accurate information dissemination [8] - Knowledge dissemination about the mechanisms, logic, and identification methods of "AI rumors" can help the public recognize and understand the nature of these falsehoods [8]