By Hyunjoo Jin SEOUL, Dec 30 (Reuters) - The U.S. government has granted an annual licence to Samsung Electronics and SK Hynix ​to bring in chip manufacturing equipment to their facilities ‌in China for 2026, two people familiar with the matter said on Tuesday. The ‌approval is a temporary relief for the South Korean firms and follows a U.S. decision earlier this year to revoke licence waivers given to some tech companies. One of the sources said that Washington ⁠introduced the annual approval ‌system ...

Joining us to discuss all of that this morning is Greg Ry Allen, senior adviser of the Wadbani AI center at CSIS. Greg, welcome back. Good to have you.>> Great to be here. >> You want to walk us through this so-called Manhattan project and whether it does move the needle for them in the way of dominance. >> Sure.To begin, we need to talk about just how complex modern AI chips are. For a chip that might be the size of your thumbnail, there are more than a hundred billion transistors, which are individual lit ...

The Stock Exchange of Hong Kong Limited and the Securities and Futures Commission of Hong Kong take no responsibility for the contents of this Application Proof, make no representation as to its accuracy or completeness and expressly disclaim any liability whatsoever for any loss howsoever arising from or in reliance upon the whole or any part of the contents of this Application Proof. Application Proof of Gpixel Changchun Microelectronics Inc. 長春長光辰芯微電子股份有限公司 (the "Company") (A joint stock company incorpor ...

Core Viewpoint - Intel has tested chipmaking tools from ACM Research, a company with ties to China, raising national security concerns amid U.S. sanctions against certain foreign entities [1][2][5]. Group 1: Company Actions - Intel tested two wet etch tools from ACM Research for potential use in its advanced chipmaking process, known as 14A, which is set to launch in 2027 [3]. - Intel has not confirmed whether it will incorporate these tools into its production process, stating that ACM's tools are not currently used in its semiconductor production and that it complies with U.S. laws [4]. Group 2: Industry Context - ACM Research has units in Shanghai and South Korea that were sanctioned last year for allegedly supporting the Chinese government's military technology efforts, although ACM denies these allegations [2]. - The testing of ACM's tools by Intel has raised concerns among national security advocates about the potential transfer of sensitive technology to China and the risk of displacing trusted Western suppliers [5]. - The U.S. government, which has a stake in Intel, is facing a complex landscape regarding chip exports to China, as evidenced by recent approvals for companies like Nvidia to sell advanced AI chips in the region [6].

Welcome back. A number of prominent Republicans are speaking out about Nvidia's potential chip sales to China following that policy shift from the Trump administration. Emily Wilkins joins us now from Washington.So, this turns out to be pretty controversial. Emily, >> Sarah, it is. I mean, remember, look, just two months ago, the Senate did vote for a package that included banning those H20 chips from going to China.And even though that provision is now out of this larger package, there are still a lot of C ...

By Laurie Chen BEIJING, Dec 10 (Reuters) - European firms are accelerating efforts to diversify away from Chinese supply chains as Beijing's self-reliance drive and export controls deepen global trade uncertainty, the European Union Chamber ​of Commerce in China said on Wednesday. China's trade surplus topped $1 trillion for the first time in November, ‌as exports to Europe, Australia and Southeast Asia surged in the wake of U.S. tariffs, fuelling diplomatic tensions over unsustainable trade imbalances. ...

Core Viewpoint - The discussion emphasizes the importance of American technological leadership and national security, particularly in relation to export controls on advanced chips to China [1][4][9]. Group 1: National Security and Technology Leadership - The CEO of Nvidia highlights the need for the United States to maintain the best technology to ensure national security and compete globally [2][4]. - Concerns are raised about the potential risks of American chips being exported to China, which could compromise U.S. security [3][15]. - The CEO advocates for a federal approach to AI regulation, arguing that state-by-state regulations could hinder technological advancement and pose national security risks [7]. Group 2: Export Controls and Regulations - There is support for export controls to ensure that American companies have access to the best technology first, while still being able to compete in the global market [6][15]. - The CEO expresses that while export controls are necessary, it is crucial not to degrade the quality of chips sold to China, as they would not accept inferior products [15]. - Discussions with the White House focus on finding the best way to implement export controls while ensuring national security and technological leadership [12]. Group 3: Industry Collaboration - Nvidia collaborates closely with major American technology companies, which allows for the design and launch of advanced technologies in partnership with these firms [11]. - The CEO emphasizes the importance of American technology companies in maintaining a competitive edge in the global market [11].

U.S. President Donald Trump met with chip giant Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang on Wednesday to discuss export controls, a CBS News reporter said in a post on X. ...

Core Viewpoint - A senior US Democrat is calling for an investigation into four Chinese semiconductor firms linked to Nexperia, citing potential risks to the safety and reliability of automotive components used in the US and allied countries [1][2]. Group 1: Investigation Request - The request for investigation is part of ongoing tensions involving China, Europe, and the US, amid internal conflicts and supply-chain disruptions related to Nexperia [2]. - The letter was addressed to Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick and Jeffrey Kessler, head of the Bureau of Industry and Security, highlighting concerns over the shift to unvetted Chinese suppliers [5][4]. Group 2: Companies Involved - The four Chinese firms under scrutiny include Wuxi NCE Power, Hangzhou Silan Microelectronics, Yangjie Technology, and WingSkySemi, with WingSkySemi being the most likely candidate for investigation [3][6]. - Nexperia has suspended wafer supplies to its Chinese assembly plant, prompting the need for alternative suppliers from China [5]. Group 3: Safety Concerns - The shift to unvetted suppliers raises significant concerns regarding safety certification, quality control, and the reliability of components in critical vehicle systems [4][7]. - Yangjie Technology has stated it has not supplied wafers to Nexperia China, while the other companies did not respond to inquiries [7].

Summary of Key Points from the Investor Presentation on China's Export Control Playbook and Market Impact Industry Overview - The presentation focuses on the **China** and **US** trade dynamics, particularly in the context of **export controls** and **tariffs** affecting the technology and critical materials sectors, including **rare earths** and **lithium batteries** [17][21][24]. Core Insights and Arguments 1. **US-China Tariff Adjustments**: - The US has reduced tariffs on China from **145% to 30%**, while China has lowered tariffs on US goods from **125% to 10%** as part of a temporary truce [19][28]. - The truce is fragile, with potential for future escalations in tariffs and non-tariff barriers [18][28]. 2. **China's Dominance in Critical Materials**: - China holds a significant global market share in rare earths and lithium batteries, with **90%** of refined production and **86%** of EV battery production [22]. - The country’s dominance is supported by a complete value chain and cost advantages in lithium-ion battery production [23]. 3. **Export Control Framework**: - China has been gradually implementing an export control framework since **2020**, with significant regulations introduced in **2024-2025** covering critical metals and technologies [24][26]. - The framework aims to consolidate regulations and enforce selective export controls on various materials, including rare earths and EV battery technologies [25][26]. 4. **Impact of Trade Tensions**: - Rising trade tensions and technology restrictions have prompted China to assertively control exports of critical materials, which could impact global supply chains [24][28]. - The US has also expanded tech controls, which may expose vulnerabilities in China's tech supply chain [29][30]. 5. **Economic Scenarios Post-Truce**: - Three potential scenarios for the evolution of the US-China truce are outlined: - **Bear Case**: Truce collapses, leading to sharp export slowdowns and supply chain disruptions. - **Base Case**: A one-year truce with intermittent frictions, resulting in marginal economic balancing. - **Bull Case**: Progress towards a framework deal, with improved economic conditions and reduced uncertainty [28]. Additional Important Insights - **Self-Sufficiency in Semiconductors**: - China's self-sufficiency in semiconductors remains low, with projections indicating only a **39%** self-sufficiency ratio by **2027** [31]. - The GPU self-sufficiency ratio is expected to reach **50%** by **2027**, indicating some progress in localization efforts [31]. - **Export Growth Trends**: - Recent data indicates a softening in export growth, attributed to high base effects and front-loaded production [33]. - The year-on-year export growth is expected to be negative, but this is likely a one-off occurrence rather than a long-term trend [33]. - **Inflation and Economic Indicators**: - Inflation is projected to level off towards the end of the year, with CPI rebounding due to seasonal effects [38][40]. - The economic outlook remains cautious, with potential impacts from ongoing trade tensions and export controls [28][40]. This summary encapsulates the critical insights and implications of the current trade dynamics between the US and China, particularly focusing on export controls and their impact on the technology and critical materials sectors.