监管部门对理财产品估值整改的要求正在推动行业发生深刻变化。自去年12月相关规定下发以来，理财公司需在今年6月底前完成一半整改任务，年底前全 面完成。面对即将到来的年中考核节点，多家机构已基本达成阶段性目标，但整改进程呈现明显的差异化特征。 整改工作稳步推进但进展不一 各家理财公司在估值整改方面表现出不同的节奏和进度。部分华南地区的股份行理财公司早在去年底就已全面完成相关整改工作，当前业务运营几乎未受影 响。这些机构提前布局，避免了后续调整带来的压力。 华东地区的理财子公司则采取了更为审慎的策略。为应对监管要求的严格化，这些机构主动缩短债券投资久期，在信用债配置上表现得更加谨慎。华北地区 的城商行理财子公司普遍认为按时完成整改任务难度不大，涉及的业务和产品数量相对有限。 净值波动加大促使策略调整 估值整改工作的深入推进将不可避免地增加理财产品的净值波动幅度。这种变化正在倒逼理财公司重新审视和调整资产配置策略。缩短债券久期成为多数机 构的共同选择，通过降低久期风险来控制产品净值的波动程度。 理财公司还通过审慎控制杠杆水平、精选投资标的等方式来减小净值波动。多资产、多策略产品因此迎来发展机遇期。债券资产收益率下行且 ...

Core Viewpoint - The regulatory requirements for the valuation of wealth management products are being implemented steadily, with many institutions reporting that they have completed about half of the necessary adjustments by the end of June [1][2]. Group 1: Valuation Rectification Progress - Regulatory authorities have mandated that wealth management companies rectify their valuation methods by the end of June, focusing primarily on closing price valuations [1][2]. - The rectification involves prohibiting the use of closing prices, smoothing valuations, and self-built valuation models, requiring companies to adopt valuations provided by recognized financial institutions [1][2][3]. - The main focus of the rectification is on closing price valuations, which have been used to smooth daily net value fluctuations of products, particularly for illiquid assets [3][4]. Group 2: Impact on Asset Allocation - As the rectification progresses, net value fluctuations of wealth management products are expected to increase, prompting companies to adjust their asset allocation strategies [3][5]. - Companies are likely to shorten bond durations, adjust leverage, and select investment targets more carefully to mitigate overall portfolio volatility [5][6]. - The demand for multi-asset and multi-strategy products is anticipated to rise as companies adapt to the changing landscape [6][7]. Group 3: Enhancing Research and Investment Capabilities - Despite the increased volatility in net values, wealth management products still possess a diversified asset allocation advantage compared to public funds [6][7]. - Companies are focusing on improving their research and investment capabilities to maintain competitiveness in a net value-driven market [6][7]. - The ability to innovate and manage risks effectively is becoming a crucial competitive edge for wealth management firms, with leading institutions likely to capture a larger market share [6][7].

引言 金融理财圈又迎来噩耗，多家黄金机构集体爆雷！涉事老板或已圈钱跑路？ 文|LYZ 编辑|阅微札记 上个月20号本该是一个被寄予浪漫寓意的日子，没想到的却是上万名投资者噩梦的开始，其中更是不乏 一些浙商富豪，据了解，有的仅一家便被套超千万元！ 照平常人来看，做生意的人肯定是有些头脑的，为何这次却没能抵住诱惑，甚至还掏空家本持续加码？ 了解过后才知道，黄金圈这水深的吓人！ 稳赚不赔的黄金陷阱，一场精心设计的骗局 近年来，金融行业理财产品问题层出不穷，近日的这场庞氏骗局，持续时间之久，被骗资金更是刷新了 此前之最，折合人民币或高达数亿元，有相关专家认为这家公司堪比黄金圈的恒大集团。 永坤集团针对黄金的一系列托管模式可谓是极具迷惑性的，在线下渠道，让客户签一个销售合同，将托 公司买的黄金"贴心"托管到永坤仓库，签一个保管合同，最后在签下一个诱人的回购合同，承诺在到期 之后高价回收。 有相关人士透露，该公司曾承诺年化收益率可高达9%，要知道当时银行的存款利率才仅有3.45%。 到这里，相信有些人还对此心存疑虑，永坤集团显然也知道这并不能真正的吸引住客户。 | 新政策7月1号开始实施 (分类客户资金以存量年化金额为准 ...

在技术支撑层面，光大理财基于自主构建的高性能算力平台化服务能力和交互式数据分析平台，构建并投 产"固定收益投资知识图谱"，实现了资产全景视图展示、组合业绩分析、信用债定价建模等大类服务的落 地，绘制低延时更新、全局覆盖的数量化固定收益投资版图，为产品提供数智化支撑。 光大理财全新品牌slogan——"光大阳光理财 懂理财 更懂你"，不仅融入了光大理财的企业使命，即"为投 资者创造可持续价值回报，以专业的力量服务国家战略"，更体现了其专业追求，坚持以客户为中心，力 争实现增加投资者财产性收入和满足实体经济合意资金需求。 【环球网财经综合报道】6月6日，光大理财正式发布全新品牌slogan——"光大阳光理财 懂理财 更懂你"， 品牌焕新升级，由此迈入3.0时代。当前，低利率环境叠加资管行业净值化转型推进，投资者差异化理财需 求日益凸显，渠道服务模式也面临升级挑战。在此背景下，光大集团与光大银行开启战略升级进程，光大 理财积极响应，聚焦业务价值挖掘，着力深化客户链接，并以此为契机推出全新品牌理念。 据了解，作为人民币理财的开创者，中国光大银行于2004年推出了阳光理财A计划、B计划。2019年光大理 财成立后，继承 ...

转载来源：环球网 文章来源：检察日报正义网 案发后，刘某香销毁公司大量财务数据，导致确定受害人数和金额难度大大增加。面对困局，市南区检 察院提前介入，与公安机关会商，建议综合涉案账户情况以及账户转款数额、时间等规律性重复特征等 情况，认定集资参与人；同时分析公司涉案账户转款情况，对集资参与人提供材料不全，但具有明显返 本付息规律特点的转款，计入犯罪数额。经过上述工作，证实的返本付息规模从最初集资参与人报案的 2亿余元提高至17亿余元，进一步印证了集资款主要用于返本付息而非生产经营活动。 2023年7月，案件移送审查起诉。因该案可能判处无期徒刑，市南区检察院随后移送青岛市检察院。 2024年9月20日，经检察机关提起公诉，山东省青岛市中级法院以集资诈骗罪、洗钱罪数罪并罚，判处 刘某香无期徒刑，剥夺政治权利终身，并处没收个人全部财产；判处李某有期徒刑十六年，并处罚金 330万元。一审判决作出后，二被告人提出上诉。2025年3月3日，山东省高级法院裁定驳回上诉，维持 原判。 另查明，2022年11月，刘某香、李某在被监视居住期间仍不思悔改。为掩饰、隐瞒集资诈骗犯罪所得及 收益，二人将500万元集资款转至深圳市某公司 ...

近年来，理财公司服务养老第三支柱建设，持续深耕养老金融领域，不断丰富产品策略，探索创新产品 设计。作为首批个人养老金管理机构，中银理财自2023年开始先后推出9只个人养老金理财产品， 以"福""吉""禄"为品牌，打造了层次分明的养老理财产品货架。中银理财数据显示，截至今年4月 末，"福"系列产品成立以来年化收益率平均值3.98%，平均最大回撤约0.5%。 在个人养老金理财产品不断丰富的同时，其总体数量仍有较大发展空间。董希淼表示，相较于公募基 金，目前针对个人养老金账户投资的理财产品数量仍然偏少。他认为，应进一步支持理财公司创新适配 养老理财投资的新产品和专属产品，加快构建起具有不同形态、期限、风险特征的产品体系，让投资者 有更丰富的选择。 从新增产品的投资端来看，养老资金的长期性特点得以体现。据中银理财介绍，本次推出的两只产品构 建长期投资组合，重点配置高等级信用债等固定收益类资产。以"吉"固收增益3年持有期理财产品为 例，它将重点关注我国优势产业和优质公司标的，积极寻求权益类资产机会，适当增强组合收益弹性， 力争通过长期投资分享市场发展红利。 5月27日，中国理财网发布第八批个人养老金理财产品名单，本次中 ...

永坤黄金彻底爆雷了。 这颗雷酝酿已久，震动长三角，涉案金额超20亿，一批堪称社会财富中坚力量的中产、小企业主、富裕家庭遭遇沉重打击。 我们关注已久，一直苦于缺乏官方信源无法落笔。 如今，随着多家官方媒体于端午假期密集发声，真相终于无法遮掩——永坤黄金爆雷已成板上钉钉的事实，公司负责人据传已乘坐私人飞机遁逃海 外。 01 许多人不解：买黄金，如此"硬"的资产，怎么会爆雷？ 实体门店遍地开花，进一步增强了可信度。熟人推荐、圈子传播，让大批浙江的中小企业主、富裕家庭将资金投入其中。 媒体披露的案例触目惊心：有投资者与家人反复投入，累计金额达1230万元；更有甚者，将家族三代的积蓄倾囊投入，总额高达2000万元。 这些资金，承载的是一个家庭甚至一个家族的希望与未来。 关键在于，永坤黄金绝非周大福、周生生这类销售实体金饰的传统金商。它自诩为"黄金综合服务商"，无论线上还是门店购买，投资者拿到手的并非 看得见摸得着的金条金饰，而是一纸托管凭证。 这便是所谓的"黄金托管"模式，商家额外承诺诱人利息。 永坤黄金正是靠着高息承诺吸引了大批普通投资者。 据报道，其早期最高许诺年化回报高达9%，后来维持在7%左右。这远超市场平均水 ...

[Table_Date] 2025 年 06 月 09 日 [Table_Title] 2022-2025，理财产品收益回撤变迁 证券研究报告|固收研究报告 机构行为观察之 [Table_Title2] 六 [Table_Summary] 2022-24 年可视为理财行业发展的重要转折期，理财的资负结构、 风险收益均出现明显变化。2025 年，理财再迎净值化转型新阶段，我 们基于收益与回撤，观察近年理财产品的变迁，以期为新常态提供参 考。 ►复盘 2022-2025 年，理财产品收益回撤变迁 2022 年，理财市场完全净值化后的代表性冲击。在疫情优化与地 产刺激政策影响下，债市大幅回调，引发理财赎回负反馈。此次风波对 理财产品造成显著冲击，业绩表现普遍承压，约 76%的产品最大回撤超 过 50bp；收益水平整体下移，近半数产品年化收益回落至 2%以内。 2023 年，负反馈后的"修复之年"。赎回潮后，理财逐步将控回 撤和流动性管理置于业务核心，通过重塑产品布局、调整资产配置结 构，并借助净值平滑手段，实现业绩稳定。产品年化收益率普遍升至 2.5%-4.0%区间，回归历史常态水平；最大回撤明显下降，7 成以上产 ...

Core Viewpoint - A "fee price war" led by bank wealth management companies is emerging in a continuously declining interest rate environment, with many firms reducing management and service fees for their products to enhance competitiveness and adapt to market pressures [1][3]. Group 1: Fee Reductions - Several wealth management companies, including Bank of China Wealth Management and Everbright Wealth Management, have significantly lowered management fees for various products, with reductions such as Bank of China's fixed management fee dropping from 0.30% to 0.05% [2]. - According to data from Puyi Standard, the average management fee rate for bank wealth management products is expected to decrease by approximately 8% year-on-year in Q1 2025, with fixed income and mixed products seeing declines of 7.82% and 11.65%, respectively [2][3]. Group 2: Market Dynamics - The reduction in fees is attributed to intensified market competition and a return to the essence of asset management, as firms seek to attract customers amid increasing pressure from new entrants and product homogenization [3][4]. - The trend reflects a shift from extensive growth to refined operations within the wealth management industry, driven by market forces, competitive pressures, and regulatory guidance [3][5]. Group 3: Long-term Implications - While larger institutions can more easily absorb the pressure of fee reductions, smaller firms may face greater profitability challenges, leading to increased industry differentiation [5]. - The long-term strategy for wealth management firms should focus on evolving their fee structures and fostering customer loyalty, potentially through enhanced advisory services [5][6]. Group 4: International Insights - Drawing from international experiences, high fees for equity asset management products have become unsustainable, with U.S. equity product fees dropping from over 100 basis points to 50 basis points over the past 20 years [6]. - The introduction of investment advisory models, which emphasize long-term client relationships and a composite fee structure, is becoming increasingly relevant in the context of declining interest rates and the need for innovative asset management solutions [6].

Core Insights - The report focuses on the performance of three categories of wealth management products: "Fixed Income + Equity," mixed-type, and equity-type products [1][2]. Group 1: "Fixed Income + Equity" Products - The average net value growth rate for "Fixed Income + Equity" public wealth management products with a duration of over three years is 3.18%, which is generally below the preset performance benchmark [6]. - The number of long-term "Fixed Income + Equity" public wealth management products that have been in existence for over a year is less than 80, primarily operating in a closed format [6]. - Top-performing products in this category include ICBC's "Yixiang Antai Fixed Income Type Pension Wealth Management" and Postal Savings Bank's "Postal Wealth Tianyi · Hongjin Closed Series 2022 No. 2 Pension Wealth Management," both achieving a net value growth rate of 4.42% [7]. Group 2: Mixed-Type Products - The average net value growth rate for mixed-type wealth management products with a duration of 1-3 years is 2.68%, with significant performance variation among institutions [12]. - Xinyin Wealth Management's mixed-type products achieved an average net value growth rate of 4.27%, while Huaxia Wealth Management's products only reached 1.05% [12]. Group 3: Equity-Type Products - The average net value growth rate for equity-type wealth management products over the past six months is 2.75%, with a maximum drawdown of 11.19% [15]. - Notable products include Huaxia Wealth Management's "Tiangong Day Open No. 2 (Digital Infrastructure Index)" and Everbright Wealth Management's "Sunshine Red Infrastructure Public REITs Preferred No. 1," with growth rates of 17.81% and 16.63%, respectively [15].