Core Insights - The article discusses the evolution of the secondary market for overseas private equity, highlighting the significant recovery in 2024 with S transactions exceeding $162 billion, driven by a dual-track trading pattern led by LPs and GPs [1] - The emergence of continuation funds as a mainstream model for GP-led transactions, achieving a historical peak of $70 billion in transaction volume, is reshaping the exit ecosystem [1][2] - The article emphasizes the structural advantages of continuation funds, which cater to existing LPs' exit and reinvestment needs while attracting new LPs with high transparency and short recovery periods [2] Development and Characteristics of Continuation Funds - Continuation funds are increasingly prevalent in overseas markets, providing GPs with extended management periods and enhancing excess returns [2] - In the past five years, continuation funds have gained market share as a supplement to traditional exit methods, with 2024's total continuation transactions surpassing $70 billion, a 17% increase from 2021 [2] - The share of private equity exits via continuation funds rose from 10% in 2022 to 14% in 2024, indicating significant growth compared to previous years [2] Management Perspective - In 2024, 65% of continuation exit transactions were the first attempts by fund managers to establish continuation funds [3] - North America dominates continuation transactions with a 61% market share, while Europe follows with a 36% share, reflecting a 50% year-on-year growth in Europe [3] - The top five industries for continuation fund deployment in 2024 include technology, healthcare, business services, industrials, and consumer goods [3] Operational Mechanisms of Continuation Funds - Continuation funds face challenges in due diligence, pricing, negotiation, and funding pressures, which can complicate domestic practices [6] - The article suggests that lessons from overseas markets can help address these challenges through improved terms and LP protection measures [6] Terms Arrangement of Continuation Funds - Overseas markets have established certain transaction practices for continuation funds, including GP commitment ratios exceeding 5% in over 90% of cases [7] - Multi-asset continuation funds tend to have higher average management fees to cover complex management needs, incentivizing GPs to perform diligently [7] - A tiered profit distribution structure is prevalent, with over 80% of transactions adopting a three-tier structure, enhancing transaction efficiency [7] LP-Friendly Trends - LP-friendly transaction schemes are being implemented to reduce friction in continuation transactions and protect stakeholder interests [8] - The operational process of LP-friendly continuation funds includes enhancing LPAC approval rights, ensuring transparency, and providing multiple exit options [10][11] Performance of Continuation Funds - Continuation funds have shown positive performance in enhancing returns and reducing portfolio risks, with single-asset continuation funds performing comparably to buyout funds [12] - The study indicates that single-asset funds have a slightly higher total value multiple (TVPI), while multi-asset funds exhibit higher distributed paid-in (DPI) ratios, reflecting faster cash flow [12] Implications for Domestic Market - The expansion of overseas continuation funds highlights their anti-cyclical value and the need for domestic practices to overcome key bottlenecks [17] - The article suggests that domestic markets can learn from overseas mechanisms, such as tiered profit distribution and dynamic pricing mechanisms, to enhance liquidity and management incentives [18] - Institutionalizing LP rights protection through transparent processes and collaborative due diligence can help shift perceptions of continuation funds [19] Conclusion - The historical peak of over $70 billion in continuation fund transactions in 2024 underscores their value as a core vehicle for GP-led transactions [21] - The article advocates for the domestic market to leverage continuation funds not only as an exit channel but also as a key hub for reshaping the investment cycle [21]

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the recent rumors regarding "closure" and product dividends from the quantitative private equity firm Kuande Investment, clarifying that there is no unified "closure" plan at the company level, but rather adjustments in fundraising pace to better match strategy capacity and enhance investor experience [1][3]. Group 1: Kuande Investment's Response - Kuande Investment addressed media reports about a potential "closure" on June 30, stating that the adjustments in fundraising are aimed at improving strategy capacity and ensuring a good experience for investors [3]. - The company emphasized that it will cautiously advance the subsequent opening of products while controlling the scale of similar strategies [3]. Group 2: Industry Trends - Several private equity firms have announced partial product "closures," indicating a trend in the industry [6]. - For instance, Yanfeng Investment plans to close new customer subscriptions for certain products starting July 1, while existing investors can still add funds [7]. - The trend of "closure" among top private equity firms is driven by the need to prioritize investor interests and manage product performance effectively [9]. Group 3: Driving Forces Behind the Closure Trend - The article identifies three main driving forces behind the trend of closures among top private equity firms: 1. Strategy capacity and diminishing returns issues, where the "scale curse" becomes evident post-regulation changes, particularly in quantitative strategies [11]. 2. A shift from "scale worship" to "performance supremacy," where firms prioritize maintaining performance over merely increasing scale [12]. 3. Structural market conditions that create pressure on strategy adaptation, particularly in sectors like technology, where high trading activity contrasts with limited liquidity in quality stocks [12].

KKR & Co. Inc. Private Credit Overview June 2023 Legal Disclosures This presentation has been prepared by KKR & Co. Inc. solely for informational purposes for its public stockholders in connection with evaluating the business, operations and financial results of KKR & Co. Inc. and its subsidiaries (collectively, "KKR"), which includes The Global Atlantic Financial Group LLC and its subsidiaries (collectively, "Global Atlantic") as of February 1, 2021. This presentation is not and shall not be construed as a ...

Group 1 - Several leading private equity firms have voluntarily suspended new client subscriptions, indicating a significant market trend [1][3] - On June 16, a quantitative private equity firm announced the closure of new client subscriptions for specific index-enhanced products starting July 1, while existing investors can still add funds [1] - Another firm announced on May 30 that it would pause new client subscriptions for a specific product, with the resumption date to be announced later, while existing clients remain unaffected [3] Group 2 - The private equity market has shown signs of recovery, as many firms are proactively closing subscriptions during a hot issuance phase to protect investor interests and manage strategy capacity [3] - As of the end of May, there were 12,843 private equity securities investment funds with an average return of 4.34% this year, with stock strategy products leading at an average return of 4.81% [3] - Quantitative long strategy products have performed exceptionally well, with an average return of 8.46% and 86.62% of products achieving positive returns [3]

Core Viewpoint - The recent announcement by the Guangdong Provincial Finance Department regarding the management fee structure for government investment funds has sparked significant discussion in the investment community, particularly concerning the implications for venture capital (VC) firms and their management fee practices [10][11][12]. Group 1: Management Fee Structure - The management fee for government investment funds will now be determined based on performance evaluations, and fees should primarily be paid from fund earnings or interest, not from the principal [10][11]. - A notable shift in the management fee model is the move from a traditional "commitment-based" fee structure to a "performance-based" one, where fees are only collected if the fund generates returns [11][12]. - The common fee structure of "2+20" (2% management fee and 20% performance fee) is under scrutiny, with some firms now promising to defer management fees until after the fund has generated returns [2][10]. Group 2: Industry Reactions and Trends - The investment community is experiencing a "management fee earthquake," with LPs (limited partners) questioning the viability of traditional fee structures and some VCs offering to waive fees during the fundraising phase [10][15]. - The average fundraising time has significantly increased, from around 10 months in 2015-2020 to approximately 27 months currently, leading to increased pressure on VCs to adapt their fee structures [9][10]. - The new regulations may lead to a broader reevaluation of the management fee practices across the industry, with potential implications for the survival of many GP (general partner) firms [15][16]. Group 3: Financial Implications - The financial sustainability of VC firms is at risk, as management fees are crucial for covering operational costs such as salaries and office rent [12][15]. - The average DPI (Distributions to Paid-In) for government-guided funds is only 0.7, indicating that many funds have not yet returned their initial investments, which raises concerns about the long-term viability of the current investment model [13][14]. - The shift in management fee practices reflects a broader trend of decreasing fees in the industry, with some major firms reducing their management fees in response to market conditions [15][16].

Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the article highlights the successful fundraising of Chaoxi Capital's second phase RMB main fund, which raised 700 million yuan, following the previous fund's over 900 million yuan collection, indicating steady growth in management scale and capability [2] - The LP composition of the new fund maintains a high level of industrial and market orientation, with nearly 60% coming from industrial LPs, and a 50% reinvestment rate from existing LPs [2] - Key cornerstone investors include Suzhou Fund and various listed companies and industry groups, with several new and existing LPs in the decision-making process for further participation [2] Group 2 - Chaoxi Capital, established in 2015, has accumulated an asset management scale of 7 billion yuan and has invested in over 40 companies across various sectors, nurturing 5 unicorns and 12 potential unicorns [3] - The second phase fund will focus on energy and technology sectors, aiming to cultivate future leading enterprises with strong technological innovation and industrialization capabilities [2]

The year has turned a bit south for those heavy hitters in the private equity industry as Trump trade turmoil ratchets up angst with companies and top leaders. The value of global buyout deals in the second quarter of this year is poised to drop by 16% compared to the first quarter, according to a new report from consultancy Bain. For the first time in a decade, no buyout fund closed in the first quarter raised more than $5 billion, the report found. Across alternative asset classes, demand now outstrips su ...

Core Viewpoint - A securities class action lawsuit has been filed against Compass Diversified Holdings for irregularities in financial reporting and practices related to its acquisition of Lugano Holdings, leading to a significant drop in stock price [1][3]. Group 1: Company Overview - Compass Diversified Holdings is a private equity firm headquartered in Westport, Connecticut [2]. - In 2021, Compass acquired a majority interest in Lugano Holdings, Inc., a high-end jewelry designer, for an enterprise value of $256 million [2]. Group 2: Legal Action Details - The class action lawsuit pertains to investors who purchased Compass securities between May 1, 2024, and May 7, 2025 [1]. - Investors have until July 8, 2025, to seek appointment as lead plaintiff in the class action [2]. Group 3: Financial Irregularities - On May 7, 2025, Compass disclosed irregularities in Lugano's non-CODI financing, accounting, and inventory practices, necessitating a restatement of previously issued financial statements for 2024 [3]. - Following this announcement, Compass' stock price plummeted by $10.70 per share, a decline of over 62%, closing at $6.55 on May 8, 2025 [3].

NB Private Equity Partners Announces the Results of the Annual General Meeting St Peter Port, Guernsey 12 June 2025 NB Private Equity Partners Limited (the “Company”) is pleased to announce that at the Annual General Meeting of its Class A Shareholders held at 1.45 p.m. on 12 June 2025, each of the Resolutions tabled were duly passed without amendment. All resolutions as set out in the Notice of AGM, of which resolutions 1-10 were proposed as ordinary resolutions and resolutions 11 and 12 were proposed as ...

Core Viewpoint - Apollo, a leading private equity firm managing $785 billion in assets, is discontinuing its controversial recruiting practice for the 2027 associate class, which has faced criticism from industry leaders like JPMorgan Chase CEO Jamie Dimon [1][4]. Group 1: Recruitment Changes - Apollo communicated via email that it will not participate in recruiting for the 2027 associate class this year, encouraging candidates to take time to understand the business world and reflect on their career passions [2][8]. - This decision contrasts with the industry norm of "on-cycle" recruiting, where first-year investment bankers compete for future positions shortly after starting their jobs, often leading to stressful situations [3][5]. Group 2: Industry Reactions - JPMorgan recently warned its incoming first-year bankers that accepting pre-dated jobs would result in termination, highlighting a growing concern over the ethics of early recruiting practices [4]. - Apollo's CEO, Marc Rowan, stated that the change aims to improve the quality of recruits and address concerns raised by Wall Street leaders regarding the rushed decision-making process for candidates [5][6]. Group 3: Future Outlook - Rowan emphasized that Apollo is in a strong position to attract talent and that avoiding rushed decisions will help reduce turnover, benefiting both candidates and the firm [7][6].