(责编：牛镛、岳弘彬) "共享电单车"滥用行政权力排除、限制竞争案是最高法首例认定滥用行政权力排除、限制竞争的案件。 互联网租赁自行车服务提供商青某公司，以某行政审批局、某市大数据中心在该市违法设定并实施共享 电单车特许经营，构成滥用行政权力排除、限制竞争为由，提起行政诉讼，请求撤销被诉具体行政行 为。最高法二审认为，某行政审批局在该市共享电单车领域设定特许经营权，缺乏法律依据，超越职权 范围，且在案证据不足以证明撤销被诉行为会损害国家利益和社会公共利益，判决撤销被诉行政行为。 《 人民日报 》（ 2025年09月11日 13 版） 本报北京9月10日电 （记者魏哲哲）最高人民法院10日发布5件反垄断典型案例，涉及滥用行政权力排 除、限制竞争行为，固定商品价格及分割销售市场的横向垄断行为以及行业协会组织本行业的经营者从 事垄断行为等重要法律问题，涵盖交通、建材、原料药、化工等民生行业。 ...

Core Points - The Supreme People's Court of China released five typical antitrust cases, including the first case recognizing the abuse of administrative power to eliminate and restrict competition in the "shared electric bike" sector [1] - The court's decision aims to clarify the standards for recognizing the abuse of administrative power and to promote market access, enhancing market vitality [1] - The cases also cover horizontal monopoly behaviors such as fixed pricing and market division, affecting industries like construction materials, raw pharmaceuticals, and chemicals [1] Group 1 - The "shared electric bike" case involved a company in Hangzhou that challenged the illegal establishment of a franchise for shared electric bikes by local administrative bodies, leading to the annulment of the specific administrative actions [1] - The horizontal monopoly agreement case involving concrete companies established rules for estimating damages and calculating losses, easing the burden of proof for plaintiffs in such disputes [1] - The cases reflect the judicial review of local antitrust enforcement decisions, ensuring the legality and fairness of enforcement procedures [2]