在短视频和AI席卷内容行业的当下，文字创作者的处境显得格外微妙。今日头条2025年深度创作者大会上， 我主持了其中一场圆桌对话，与 驻 美记者王冰汝、财经博主半佛仙人、自媒体人三表龙门阵围坐一堂，聊的不是行业愿景，而是各自的焦虑与坚守。 半佛仙人坦言自己现在害怕爆款——影响力是把双刃剑，普通人饭桌上的闲话放到公众人物嘴里就可能变成翻车现场。他还抛出了一个尖锐的观察：AI 时代对新人反而更残酷，因为你要回答一个老创作者不需要面对的质疑——"没有AI的时候怎么没有你？" 王冰汝的流量密码则简单得令人羡慕：特朗普。从第一任期追到现在，这位美国总统简直是她的24小时"抖加"，源源不断地制造新闻素材，2026年还有中 期选举、世界杯、特朗普80大寿加白宫UFC格斗赛等着她。 三表龙门阵的态度最为" 躺平 "：1500字以内把观点说清楚，这是他的舒适区，不需要用AI。 他甚至故意不用，要保留人味儿——那种蠢蠢的、呆呆的、 带着情绪的质感，而不是AI那种方方面面都齐全的完备感。 三位创作者，三种生存哲学，折射出内容行业一个共同的命题：当工具越来越强大，人的不可替代性究竟在哪里？ 以下是本场对谈的文字实录，后续会多将《乱翻书 ...

Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the article highlights the profound transformation in the content creation field due to the rapid development of artificial intelligence technology, with tools like Youcaiyun AI Content Factory pushing "pseudo-original" articles into a new stage of industrialization and automation [1] - These platforms claim to automatically gather information from the internet, filter, process, and rewrite it, aiming to "reduce costs and increase efficiency" for operators, which represents a technological and commercial advancement [1] Group 2 - However, this model raises significant concerns regarding content ecology, information quality, and the essence of creation, as it exacerbates content homogenization and the proliferation of information waste [3] - The system's reliance on keyword-based mass collection and reorganization leads to outputs that are essentially rearrangements and synonym replacements of existing information, drowning out truly original and insightful viewpoints [3][4] - This reliance on AI-generated pseudo-original content undermines the foundational values of creativity, thoughtfulness, and humanistic value in content creation [4][5] Group 3 - Genuine creation stems from human experience observation, thought, and unique expression, while the operation logic of pseudo-original AI focuses on optimizing "originality" scores to cater to algorithm recommendations and gain traffic, rather than conveying true insights or emotional resonance [5] - Over time, this could lead to a degradation of content creation into mere technical operations, where creators become mere "supervisors" on a traffic assembly line, potentially harming cultural innovation and knowledge accumulation [5] Group 4 - Despite attempts to address copyright issues through features like "content fingerprinting" and "source URLs," the underlying source of these systems remains the hard work of original authors, raising legal and ethical concerns [6] - The industrialized production of content through "take-and-use" practices lacks respect for original creators and undermines the fairness principles of a healthy creative ecosystem [6] Group 5 - From a user experience and trust perspective, AI-generated pseudo-original content often exhibits inconsistent quality, leading to awkward sentence structures and logical disconnections, which diminishes the reading experience [7] - When content shifts from serving readers and creating value to merely attracting clicks, it strays from its original purpose of communication [7] - While tools like Youcaiyun AI Content Factory may have value in specific scenarios as efficiency tools, their potential negative impacts should not be overlooked, reflecting the impatience and shortcut mentality in the content industry driven by traffic economics [7]