第十二届IPP国际会议 — 重塑现代化：中国与全球南方 — Reshaping Modernization: China and the Global South 在世界秩序经历结构性变革的背景下，国际社会亟需以全球南方的经验为核心，求索现代化的新路径。当前，世界的发展范式正逐步超越"华盛顿共 识"与"北京共识"的二元对立，走向更加多元乃至分化的新阶段。在这一进程中，全球南方正在深刻重塑我们对现代化的认知和理解。我们想要探寻的重 要问题是：全球南方将如何凝聚共识、实现团结，并进一步推动世界秩序的重塑？在全球化放缓且日益碎片化的背景下，全球南方国家能否突围而出？其 在过去几十年间积累的现代化经验，能否通过重新概念化，为全球发展提供新的思路与方案？我们将把全球南方与中国置于比较的视角下，探索现代化道 路的新思想与新洞见。 圆桌讨论：中国与全球南方的多元现代化路径 主持人 汉斯·道维勒（Hans d'Orville） 联合国教科文组织（UNESCO）前战略规划助理总干事；华南理工大学公共政策研究院荣誉教授 汉斯·道维勒（Hans d'Orville）博士于2000年至2015年担任联合国教科文组织战略规划副总干事兼 ...

Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the articles highlights China's significant advancement in climate change research, surpassing the United States in both the number of published papers and citation quality [2][5][7] - In 2023, Chinese research institutions published approximately 14,000 papers related to climate change, exceeding the United States' 13,000 papers, marking a shift in global research leadership [5][7] - The global publication of climate change-related papers is projected to reach around 77,000 in 2024, with China contributing about 17,000 papers, accounting for 20% of the total [5] Group 2 - China's electric vehicle (EV) global sales share reached 55% as of Q4 2024, leading the market, with steady growth in Europe and Asia [5] - The domestic installed capacity of solar and wind power in China reached 50% in 2023, surpassing traditional coal power, indicating a significant shift towards decarbonization [5] - The Chinese leadership has set the "3060 goal," aiming for carbon emissions to peak by 2030 and achieve carbon neutrality by 2060, reflecting a strong commitment to climate action [7] Group 3 - The role of China in the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) is increasing, with Chinese representatives being appointed to key positions, such as co-chairing working groups on climate warming assessments [7] - The United States has shown a declining commitment to climate change research since the Trump administration, proposing significant budget cuts for related agencies [8]

Core Viewpoint - Springer Nature offers a comprehensive portfolio of open access (OA) journals, providing authors with high-impact publishing options and increased citation opportunities for their research [3]. Group 1: OA Journal Portfolio - Springer Nature has approximately 700 pure OA journals, with 2023 OA articles averaging 6.3 citations each, surpassing industry peers [3]. - Over 500 pure OA journals have an impact factor (IF), with 62% of these journals showing growth in their IF [4]. - 309 pure OA journals are ranked in Q1 across various disciplines, representing 57% of the total [4]. - 450 pure OA journals are in the top 50 of their respective fields, accounting for 83% [4]. - 106 pure OA journals are in the top 10 of their fields, including notable journals like Signal Transduction and Targeted Therapy [4]. Group 2: Historical Context and Development - Springer, founded in 1842, is a renowned publishing brand in science, technology, medicine, humanities, and social sciences, with over 2000 mixed and OA journals [5]. - BMC, a pioneer in OA publishing, has around 300 peer-reviewed OA journals focused on advancing biological, health, and medical sciences [7][8]. Group 3: Specific Journal Highlights - The Discover journal series aims to support rapid publication of research across various scientific fields, targeting a publication timeline of 7-10 weeks [14]. - Nature Partner Journals (npj) collaborate with global scientists and institutions to publish high-quality OA research in diverse scientific areas [19]. - The Communications series under Nature Portfolio emphasizes diverse community engagement and aims to publish research that brings new insights to its fields [23]. - Nature Communications, a highly selective multidisciplinary OA journal, has an impact factor of 15.7 and a total citation count of 911,428 for 2024 [30]. - Scientific Reports, another multidisciplinary OA journal, has an impact factor of 3.9 and a total citation count of 834,622 for 2024 [34]. - Humanities and Social Sciences Communications provides a rigorous platform for research in the humanities and social sciences, with an impact factor of 3.6 for 2024 [35].

我们对"盲点"一词并不陌生。在生理学中，盲点指的是视网膜上的一个特殊位置，这里是神经纤维的汇集点， 因缺乏感光细胞，无法感知外部光线，也无法产生神经信号，从而形成了视觉上的"空白"。尽管我们的两只眼 睛中都存在视觉盲点，但我们在日常生活中却毫无察觉。这是因为我们双眼视野重叠，大脑可通过整合来自每 只眼睛的信息自动补偿盲点产生的视觉缺失。 《何为科学》一书的三位作者巧妙地借用了"盲点"这一概念，认为人类认识科学时也存在一种类似视觉盲点的 奇特现象。虽然这种认知盲点使我们对一些原本显而易见的事实视而不见，并在无形中影响着我们对经验证据 的准确理解，深刻塑造了我们对现代科学的整体认知，但我们自己竟对此全然不知。 由于盲点的存在，我们今天对科学的认识不够完整，甚至带有偏差。我们忘记了直接经验才是科学的本质来源 和坚实支撑，反而将一种特殊的世界观嫁接到科学上。"这种世界观认为，科学给我们提供了关于客观物理实在 的真实描述，或至少是对所有可观察物理现象的真实描述。" 本文为《何为科学》译者所写的导读，有删节。荐读之。 《何为科学》 作 者 ： [ 美 ] 亚 当 · 弗 兰 克 [ 美 ] 马 塞 洛 · 格 雷 斯 [ ...

Group 1 - The 2025 China Science and Technology Journal Development Forum was held in Beijing, focusing on the theme "Breaking Boundaries, Restructuring, Empowering - Building a New Ecology of Academic Publishing" [1][8] - The forum included keynote reports and four thematic discussion panels, covering topics such as enhancing journal quality through platform support, constructing an independent evaluation system for journals, and building first-class journals [1][8] - The "Academic Association" platform was launched at the forum, aiming to integrate resources and provide comprehensive services for journal publishing and academic integrity monitoring [5][7] Group 2 - Keynote reports were presented by prominent figures, including the Vice Chairman of the China Association for Science and Technology and editors from various scientific journals, discussing the role of journals in industrial innovation and the impact of AI on academic platforms [3][5] - The forum is part of the "China Science and Technology Journal Excellence Action Plan," which aims to enhance the academic quality and influence of journals, as well as promote independent publishing and data platform development [8]

Core Insights - China continues to lead in scientific research output, expanding its advantage according to the Nature Index 2025 Research Leaders list [1][2] - The data reflects a significant shift in the global research landscape, with China's sustained investment in technology translating into rapid growth in high-quality research output [2] Summary by Categories Research Output - China's share in the Nature Index reached 32,122, a year-on-year increase of approximately 17% [1] - The United States follows with a share of 22,083, while Germany, the UK, Japan, and France also rank among the top contributors [1] Institutional Rankings - Among the top ten global institutions, eight are Chinese, with the Chinese Academy of Sciences ranked first [1] - Other notable Chinese institutions include the University of Science and Technology of China (3rd), Zhejiang University (4th), Peking University (5th), and Tsinghua University (7th) [1] Regional Trends - Asian countries are strengthening their positions, with South Korea rising to 7th place, surpassing Canada [1] - India remains in 9th place, while Western countries have seen a decline in their adjusted shares for the second consecutive year, with decreases of at least 7% for Canada, France, Switzerland, the UK, and the US [1]