Core Viewpoint - Cell Press has launched a new open-access journal, Cell Press Blue, focusing on significant pioneering research in life sciences, physical sciences, medicine, sustainable development, and applied sciences [3] Group 1: Journal Overview - Cell Press Blue welcomes interdisciplinary research that connects biology, medicine, chemistry, physics, materials science, energy, environmental science, and sustainable development [3] - The journal will publish authoritative reviews and opinion articles to showcase emerging opportunities and reflect on the role of science in addressing major contemporary challenges [3] Group 2: Editorial Leadership - The editor-in-chief of Cell Press Blue is Dr. Andy Jobbins, who has a background in molecular and cellular biology and has worked in various prestigious research institutions [5] - A co-editor will be based in China, focusing on the field of physical sciences, with details to be announced soon [6] Group 3: Submission Benefits - Authors submitting to Cell Press Blue will engage with high-impact research that can disrupt scientific paradigms, with all papers selected by a professional editorial team from Cell Press [7] - The journal emphasizes a "service-first" philosophy, providing comprehensive support to authors throughout the submission and publication process [8] Group 4: Impact and Promotion - Cell Press Blue aims to promote disruptive scientific research that transcends disciplinary boundaries and contributes to sustainable development [9] - The journal will utilize a professional promotion team to ensure that every published paper receives broad attention and citation [9] Group 5: Additional Features - Collaborative promotion with other relevant Cell Press journals will enhance the visibility of research findings [10] - The journal maintains high standards aligned with other top-tier Cell Press publications, ensuring rigorous quality control [10] - Efficient review processes and direct communication with editors will streamline the publication timeline for authors [10] Group 6: Visibility and Outreach - Targeted marketing activities will significantly enhance the visibility of research published in Cell Press Blue [11] - The journal actively recommends research with news value to mainstream media, helping authors reach a wider audience [11]

【文/观察者网专栏作者 心智观察所】 二十年前，如果有人预言全球应用科学领域排名前三十的顶尖机构将全部来自同一个国家，这大概会被 视为痴人说梦。然而，这个看似不可能的预言如今已成为现实。 《自然指数》近期发布的首份应用科学榜单犹如一记惊雷，在全球科学界激起千层浪——中国科研机构 不仅包揽了前十名，更是垄断了前三十名的所有席位，直到第三十一名才出现新加坡国立大学的身影。 当中国的贡献分值高达22261，占据全球应用科学产出的56%，而排名第二的美国仅有4099分、占比 10%时，我们不得不正视一个事实：在这场关乎国家竞争力与未来发展的科学竞赛中，攻守之势，已然 互换。 《自然指数》是《自然》旗下极具影响力的学术评估工具，长期以来被视为衡量全球顶尖科研产出的权 威标尺。 此次发布的应用科学榜单，依据的是过去一年间发表在25家应用科学期刊和会议上的文章，涵盖工程 学、计算机科学、食品科学等领域。这些期刊的遴选经过了近4200名研究人员的调查筛选，代表着他们 愿意发表最重要研究成果的学术平台。换言之，这份榜单呈现的是各国在"学以致用"这一科学核心命题 上的真实实力。 榜单的结果令人瞠目。中国科学院毫无悬念地占据榜首， ...

Core Points - The article discusses the significance of the work of physicist Yang Zhenning, emphasizing the importance of his contributions to theoretical physics and their impact on human understanding of the universe [2][11][43] - It highlights two major achievements: the proposal of "parity non-conservation" with Li Zhengdao and the development of the "Yang-Mills theory" [22][24][27] Group 1: Importance of Physics - Physics is described as a fundamental science with the mission to explore the essence of the world [5][30] - The article uses analogies to illustrate how advancements in physics provide a better understanding of the universe, comparing historical and modern tools [4][8] Group 2: Yang Zhenning's Contributions - Yang Zhenning and Li Zhengdao's 1956 paper challenged the established notion of "parity conservation," leading to their Nobel Prize win [18][22] - The "Yang-Mills theory" is recognized as a significant theoretical framework that attempts to unify the four fundamental forces of nature [26][27] Group 3: Impact on Chinese Science - Yang Zhenning's return to China in 1971 is noted as a pivotal moment for the development of theoretical physics in the country, helping to elevate its status to a world-class level [29][34] - His contributions are credited with fostering the growth of numerous academicians and enhancing research facilities in Chinese universities [34][37] Group 4: Future Implications - The article stresses the necessity of foundational research in physics for future technological advancements, particularly in areas like controlled nuclear fusion and high-temperature superconductors [40][41] - It concludes that Yang Zhenning's work is essential for addressing deeper scientific questions that transcend national boundaries, serving humanity as a whole [43][45]

Group 1 - The sudden resignation of NSF Director S. Panchanathan was prompted by a 55% budget cut ordered by the Trump administration, leading to the termination of half of the NSF's 1,700 staff members [1][2] - NSF has been perceived as a "fortress of basic science" in the U.S., but the scientific community is now lamenting its destruction under the current administration [2][3] - The NSF's funding has historically been limited, receiving only about 1.5% of the total U.S. annual R&D expenditure, indicating that the vision outlined by Vannevar Bush in "Science: The Endless Frontier" has never been fully realized [10][24] Group 2 - NSF has faced internal conflicts since its inception, with challenges from applied sciences and political pressures to align more closely with national interests, diverging from its original mission of supporting pure scientific research [11][28] - The establishment of the Engineering Directorate in 1981 marked a significant shift, allowing engineering to gain equal footing with basic sciences within NSF, reflecting a broader trend of NSF's evolving focus [14][20] - Recent legislation, including the CHIPS and Science Act, has further emphasized the importance of applied research and technology, indicating a departure from the original intent of NSF as a purely scientific institution [23][25] Group 3 - The NSF's current operational model has shifted to balance both basic science and applied technology, contradicting the initial vision of being a non-political entity focused solely on fundamental research [24][28] - The emphasis on technology within NSF has increased significantly, with the term "technology" appearing 230 times in recent legislative texts, compared to only 163 mentions of "science" [26][28] - The NSF's alignment with U.S. national interests has deepened, particularly in response to geopolitical challenges, marking a significant departure from its founding principles [29][30]