召开专题工作会议。组织市场监管、民政、财政、住建、水利等相关县直部门以及水电气热专营单位召 开全县落实困难群众水电气热价格优惠政策座谈会。会上，下发了《沂源县水电气热价格优惠减免政策 明白纸》，梳理了各方面的价格优惠文件、政策依据等，要求各行业主管部门指导和督促各公用事业单 位对困难群众信息进行比较和核对，梳理水电气热"免申即享"政策落实情况，确保政策落到实处，并要 求各公用事业企业认真填写《水气热价格优惠政策"免申即享"工作台账》，按时做好上报工作。 梳理价格优惠政策。根据市级通知要求，梳理沂源县水电气热价格优惠政策，形成了《水电气热价格优 惠政策汇总表》，印发《关于印发 <水电气热价格优惠政策清单 沂源县="沂源县"> 的通知》,转发至各 镇、街道办、县直各部门以及水电气热专营单位，要求抓好工作落实。(沂源县发展和改革局崔光华) 做好工作安排部署。起草了《关于做好水电气热价格优惠政策落实工作的通知》、《关于做好水气热价 格优惠政策"免申即享"有关工作的通知》，明确了各单位工作职责和任务分工，要求各单位切实提高政 治站位，查漏补缺，抓好贯彻落实工作。 中国发展网讯为进一步落实困难群体水电气热价格优惠政策，根 ...

转自：人民日报客户端 《指南》共七章50条，针对公用事业领域垄断问题，系统总结执法经验，准确把握公用事业领域特点和 市场竞争规律，全面细化公用事业领域垄断行为认定规则，为公用事业领域反垄断执法和经营者合规提 供更为明确、清晰的指引，不仅有利于增强反垄断执法的科学性、针对性和有效性，而且有助于健全公 用事业领域反垄断监管长效机制，促进公用事业持续规范健康发展。 2月4日，国务院反垄断反不正当竞争委员会印发施行《关于公用事业领域的反垄断指南》（以下简称 《指南》），旨在预防和制止公用事业领域垄断行为，维护市场公平竞争，保护消费者利益和社会公共 利益。 供水、供电、供气、供热等公用事业领域具有自然垄断环节，近年来垄断行为较为多发，公用事业经营 者容易将其垄断优势向上下游竞争性环节延伸或排除、限制上下游竞争性环节市场竞争。由于公用事业 的公共性、地域性、政策性等特点，其垄断行为的类型、表现和损害均呈现一定特殊性。 ...

Core Viewpoint - The State Administration for Market Regulation (SAMR) has conducted a three-year special action against monopolistic practices in the livelihood sector, achieving significant results in protecting consumer rights and maintaining fair market competition. Group 1: Antitrust Enforcement in the Pharmaceutical Sector - SAMR has investigated 12 cases of monopolistic agreements and abuse of market dominance in the pharmaceutical sector, imposing fines totaling over 2.4 billion yuan, effectively deterring monopolistic behavior [1] - Major cases include fines of 1.219 billion yuan for Shanghai Pharmaceutical Biochemical, 362 million yuan for Tianjin Pharmaceutical Industry, and 223 million yuan for Shanghai Xinyi United, leading to price reductions of over 40% for involved drugs, with some prices dropping by as much as 95% [1] Group 2: Public Utilities and Consumer Protection - SAMR has addressed 16 monopolistic cases in public utilities, including water, electricity, gas, and heating, with fines totaling 183 million yuan, effectively curbing practices like price-fixing and bundling [2] - The investigation into 10 bottled liquefied gas operators in Nanjing revealed collusion to raise prices, resulting in a penalty of 8.27 million yuan [3] Group 3: Support for Small and Medium Enterprises - SAMR has taken action against monopolistic practices that harm small and medium enterprises, such as the case involving Weihai Water Group, which was fined 65.2 million yuan for abusing its market dominance [3] - The enforcement actions aim to protect the rights of smaller businesses and reduce their operational costs, fostering a more competitive environment [3] Group 4: Regulation of Platform Economy - SAMR is focusing on new forms of monopolistic behavior in the platform economy, addressing issues like "lowest price" guarantees and "choose one from two" practices that harm small merchants and consumers [4] - The agency has developed guidelines for antitrust compliance in internet platforms to enhance risk management and compliance capabilities among platform enterprises [4] Group 5: Competition Assessment in Key Industries - SAMR has conducted competition assessments in 20 industries, including semiconductors, online payments, cloud services, and express delivery, providing insights for regulatory enforcement and strategic adjustments by businesses [5] - The agency continues to implement a "three letters and one notice" system to address potential risks in enterprises through targeted regulatory measures [5]

Core Viewpoint - The National Market Regulation Administration has identified public utilities as the sector with the highest number of antitrust cases during a three-year special enforcement action, aiming to curb monopolistic behaviors that directly affect both corporate operations and the livelihoods of citizens [1][2]. Group 1: Antitrust Enforcement Actions - Public utilities have been the most frequently targeted area in antitrust enforcement, with significant actions taken against monopolistic practices in essential services like water, electricity, gas, and heating [1]. - The enforcement actions have led to tangible outcomes, including cost reductions, alleviation of burdens, and the establishment of regulations [1]. - Specific cases, such as the collusion among ten bottled liquefied gas operators in Nanjing, resulted in a fine of 8.27 million yuan for price manipulation through coordinated agreements [1]. Group 2: Impact on Small and Medium Enterprises - Long-standing issues like "designated construction" and "forced transactions" in the public utility sector have severely limited the survival space for small and medium enterprises [2]. - The case of Weihai Water Group exemplifies the abuse of market dominance, where the company was fined 65.2 million yuan for forcing local construction firms to use its services, thereby squeezing their operational space [2]. - The enforcement actions are aimed at protecting the legitimate rights of small and medium enterprises, effectively reducing their operational costs and expanding their growth opportunities [2]. Group 3: Future Regulatory Framework - The National Market Regulation Administration is focusing on promoting industry-wide compliance and sustainable development through educational initiatives and the publication of typical cases [2]. - A specialized antitrust guideline for the public utility sector is being developed to provide clearer and more predictable behavioral norms for enterprises, aiming to prevent monopolistic risks from the source [2]. - The ultimate goal of these enforcement actions is not just to address individual cases but to foster a healthy and competitive industry environment [2].