Group 1 - The article outlines the stages of the IPO due diligence process, emphasizing the importance of thorough preparation and compliance with financial, legal, and business standards [32] - The initial preparation phase involves defining objectives, assembling a team, and establishing a plan for the due diligence process [2][3] - The selection of intermediary institutions is crucial, with companies choosing sponsors, law firms, accounting firms, and evaluation agencies based on their business type and industry characteristics [3] Group 2 - The comprehensive due diligence phase lasts 3 to 6 months and includes written verification, on-site interviews, and third-party validation to assess business, financial, legal, and industry dimensions [6] - Business due diligence focuses on verifying the authenticity, sustainability, and core competitiveness of the company's operations, ensuring alignment with the intended listing segment [7] - Financial due diligence, led by accounting firms, verifies the authenticity of financial statements and compliance with accounting standards and listing financial metrics [12] Group 3 - Legal due diligence, conducted by law firms, ensures the legality and compliance of the company's structure, asset ownership, and major legal risks [17] - The article highlights the importance of addressing issues identified during the due diligence process, with companies and intermediaries collaborating to develop rectification plans [25] - The preparation of listing application materials occurs after rectification, including the prospectus, audit report, legal opinion, and sponsor's work report [28] Group 4 - The article discusses the feedback and supplementary due diligence phase, where regulatory bodies provide feedback on submitted documents, requiring intermediaries to address inquiries [29][30] - The final stage involves the issuance and listing of shares, with ongoing supervision by sponsors to ensure compliance and prevent market manipulation [31] - The overall process is described as a closed-loop of "identifying issues - resolving issues - proving compliance," highlighting the need for independent verification by professional institutions [32]

Core Points - Chongqing and Hong Kong signed two strategic cooperation agreements to deepen collaboration in professional fields [1] - The agreements focus on resource sharing, professional services, and public services among various sectors [1] - Hong Kong aims to act as a "super connector" for mainland enterprises to access international resources [1] Group 1: Agreements and Collaborations - Chongqing's New Social Class Professionals Association and Hong Kong's Professional and Senior Administrative Officers Association signed a bilateral strategic cooperation agreement [1] - A tripartite strategic cooperation agreement was signed involving Chongqing High-tech Industrial Development Zone Management Committee, Hong Kong's Professional Association, and Chongqing's New Social Class Professionals Association [1] - The collaboration will enhance coordination among lawyers, tax advisors, accountants, and asset appraisers to provide professional consulting services [1] Group 2: Industry Insights - Hong Kong is actively cultivating emerging industries such as advanced manufacturing and new energy, aligning with Chongqing's development direction [2] - Chongqing enterprises can leverage Hong Kong's innovation platforms to connect with high-quality international resources [2] - There is a call for increased collaboration between universities and research institutions in both regions to promote technology transfer and application [2]

Group 1 - The company,招商证券股份有限公司, commits to ensuring that the documents produced for the initial public offering (IPO) of 广东省建筑科学研究院集团股份有限公司 are free from false records, misleading statements, or significant omissions, and will compensate investors for any actual losses incurred due to negligence [2] - The law firm involved, 北京市金杜律师事务所, promises to compensate investors for losses resulting from false records, misleading statements, or significant omissions in the documents produced for the IPO, following a valid judicial ruling [3] - The accounting firm, 立信会计师事务所, confirms that the prospectus aligns with the audit reports and will bear legal responsibility for any inaccuracies that lead to investor losses due to reliance on the documents [4] Group 2 - 中联国际评估咨询有限公司 commits to ensuring the accuracy and validity of the documents for the IPO of 广东省建筑科学研究院集团股份有限公司, promising to compensate investors for losses caused by any errors [5] - 广东中广信资产评估有限公司 also pledges to ensure the documents are free from false records or misleading statements and will compensate investors for any losses resulting from their mistakes [5]