Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the issues surrounding the performance of the "Ultraman" children's theater show, highlighting consumer dissatisfaction due to high ticket prices and poor quality of the show, which has led to accusations of false advertising and misleading practices by the organizers [1][2][6]. Group 1: Consumer Experience and Complaints - Parents are willing to pay high prices for children's shows, but many have reported disappointing experiences, including missing promised features and poor production quality [1][2][4]. - Specific complaints include inadequate performance quality, such as poor lighting and sound, and costumes that do not meet expectations, leading to children being frightened during the show [4][6]. - Legal experts suggest that consumers may have grounds for claims under consumer protection laws due to misleading advertising and unmet promises [6][12]. Group 2: Licensing and Authorization Issues - The article reveals a complex licensing situation for the "Ultraman" IP, with multiple companies holding different rights, leading to inconsistencies in show quality and pricing [11][15]. - The core copyright holder, New Chuanghua, has stated that they have not authorized theater performances in cinemas, while another company, Qiao Tian Zun, has been found to offer significantly lower licensing fees, raising questions about the legitimacy of some performances [11][14]. - The historical context of licensing agreements dating back to 1976 has resulted in a fragmented and confusing rights landscape, impacting the quality and consistency of "Ultraman" performances in China [15][17]. Group 3: Market Impact and Future Considerations - The article notes that the "Ultraman" IP has significant commercial potential, with successful merchandise and media tie-ins, but the current licensing issues could hinder its long-term profitability [18][20]. - Industry experts emphasize the importance of proper rights management and the need for companies to establish robust licensing frameworks to avoid future disputes and maximize IP value [22]. - The ongoing copyright disputes and market confusion may damage the brand's reputation and consumer trust, which could have lasting effects on its market position [21][22].

Core Insights - The article discusses the high demand and willingness of parents to spend on children's entertainment, specifically focusing on the "Ultraman" IP and its associated performances, despite high prices and mixed quality experiences [1][2]. Group 1: Performance Pricing and Consumer Experience - The price of tickets for the "Ultraman" children's show is reported to be six times that of regular movie tickets, leading to significant consumer disappointment when promised experiences were not delivered [5][6]. - Many parents reported poor performance quality, including inadequate stage production and misleading promotional content, which led to dissatisfaction among children and parents alike [7][8][11]. Group 2: Licensing and Authorization Issues - The article highlights the confusion surrounding the licensing of "Ultraman" performances, with different companies claiming authorization, leading to significant discrepancies in performance quality and pricing [22][25]. - The core copyright holder, New Chuanghua, stated that they have not authorized cinema performances, while other companies like Qiao Tian Zun are offering low-cost licenses, raising questions about the legitimacy of these performances [19][21]. Group 3: Historical Context and Market Impact - The article traces the licensing issues back to a 1976 contract that allowed for the division of rights, resulting in multiple companies holding different aspects of the "Ultraman" IP, which has led to market confusion and quality inconsistency [22][23]. - Experts estimate that the historical licensing decisions have cost the original rights holder, Round Valley, potentially billions in lost revenue due to fragmented rights and poor market management [27][28]. Group 4: Future Implications and Industry Trends - The article suggests that the ongoing copyright disputes and the resulting market chaos could harm the global influence of the "Ultraman" brand, affecting its long-term commercial viability [33]. - Industry analysts emphasize the importance of establishing a robust licensing framework and focusing on quality content to enhance the value of domestic IPs in the competitive market [34].

Core Insights - The article discusses the high prices and poor quality of children's performances based on the Ultraman IP, highlighting consumer dissatisfaction and potential legal implications for misleading advertising [2][4][8]. Group 1: Performance Quality and Consumer Experience - Parents are willing to pay high prices for children's performances, but many report disappointing experiences, including false advertising regarding promised perks [2][4]. - The quality of the performances is criticized, with reports of inadequate production values, such as poor lighting and sound, leading to children being frightened during the show [6][8]. - Legal experts suggest that consumers may have grounds for claims under consumer protection laws due to misleading advertising and unmet expectations [8][12]. Group 2: Licensing and Authorization Issues - The Ultraman IP has multiple licensing entities, leading to significant discrepancies in performance quality and pricing, with some performances being authorized at much lower costs [10][11][14]. - The core copyright holder, New Chuanghua, has not authorized cinema performances, raising questions about the legitimacy of some shows claiming to be officially licensed [11][13]. - Historical licensing issues stemming from a 1976 contract have resulted in a fragmented and confusing authorization landscape for the Ultraman brand in China [14][16]. Group 3: Market Potential and Economic Impact - The Ultraman IP is recognized as a highly valuable asset, with significant potential for revenue generation through various channels, including merchandise and performances [17][20]. - Companies leveraging the Ultraman IP have seen substantial financial success, with examples of significant revenue contributions from related products [17][18]. - The article emphasizes the importance of proper IP management and the potential long-term financial losses due to historical licensing mistakes [19][20].

Core Viewpoint - The article highlights the issues surrounding the performance of the "Ultraman" children's theater, particularly regarding high ticket prices, misleading advertising, and poor quality of the shows, leading to consumer dissatisfaction and potential legal implications for the companies involved [1][4][9]. Group 1: Performance Quality and Consumer Experience - The ticket price for the "Ultraman" show is six times that of a movie ticket, yet the promised benefits, such as a "VIP gift package," were not delivered, leading to disappointment among parents and children [2][3]. - Many parents reported that the performance quality was subpar, with inadequate stage production, poor lighting, and costumes that did not conceal performers' identities, resulting in a negative experience for children [3][4]. - Legal experts indicated that consumers could claim refunds based on misleading advertising and poor performance quality, as the high ticket prices were justified by promised additional benefits that were not fulfilled [4][9]. Group 2: Licensing and Authorization Issues - The article discusses the confusion surrounding the licensing of "Ultraman" performances, noting that multiple companies hold different rights to the IP, leading to significant discrepancies in performance quality and pricing [12][13]. - The core copyright holder, New Chuanghua, has not authorized cinema performances, while another company, Qiao Tian Zun, claims to have obtained rights through a historical contract, resulting in a chaotic licensing environment [11][12]. - The licensing fees for "Ultraman" performances can be as low as 3,000 yuan per show, raising questions about the authenticity and quality of the performances being offered in cinemas [8][12]. Group 3: Market Impact and Future Considerations - The article emphasizes the potential financial losses incurred by the original copyright holder, Round Valley, due to historical licensing decisions, estimating losses could reach hundreds of billions over the years [13][20]. - The "Ultraman" IP has significant commercial potential, with opportunities for revenue generation through merchandise, games, and theme parks, but the current licensing confusion undermines its value [13][20]. - Industry experts suggest that the future of IP management should focus on maintaining copyright integrity and developing robust licensing frameworks to avoid similar issues in the future [20].