常青IP版权格局：历史脉络与市场现状 在近期热闹看展的背后，不少消费者却感到困惑："哪家奥特曼展才是真正的官方展览？" 近日，"追光之旅·展望奥特曼60周年主题展"在上海新世界城举办。这场由圆谷制作株式会社在中国 大陆官方认可的全版权总代理——新创华全程监修的展览，被誉为中国大陆超大规模、超高规格的奥 特曼系列主题展览，吸引了全国各地的粉丝前来观展。而另一家公司奇奥天尊，也同期在上海举办了 奥特曼相关展览。 消费者不禁困惑："哪一个才是真正的奥特曼？ "这种困惑源于中国市场错综复杂的奥特曼版权现状 ——新创华与奇奥天尊均声称拥有奥特曼版权。 这场持续近半个世纪的IP版权纠纷，也牵动着这个 跨越60年、影响数代人的经典IP在中国市场的情感认同与商业未来。 △图为新创华《追光之旅 · 展望奥特曼60周年主题展》现场 奥特曼这一经典IP已经走过了60年辉煌历程。自从1966年首次亮相以来，奥特曼系列作品逐渐扩展 至商品快消、漫画、电影、游戏、线下主题空间等领域。在中国市场，奥特曼已经从单纯的儿童向IP 迭代成为成年人也喜爱的常青IP。据数据显示，2024年奥特曼以74亿美元总收入位列全球最赚钱IP 第53位，显示出 ...

近日，"追光之旅·展望奥特曼60周年主题展"在上海新世界城举办。这场由圆谷制作株式会社在中国 大陆官方认可的全版权总代理——新创华全程监修的展览，被誉为中国大陆超大规模、超高规格的奥 特曼系列主题展览，吸引了全国各地的粉丝前来观展。而另一家公司奇奥天尊，也同期在上海举办了 奥特曼相关展览。 消费者不禁困惑："哪一个才是真正的奥特曼？ "这种困惑源于中国市场错综复杂的奥特曼版权现状 ——新创华与奇奥天尊均声称拥有奥特曼版权。 这场持续近半个世纪的IP版权纠纷，也牵动着这个 跨越60年、影响数代人的经典IP在中国市场的情感认同与商业未来。 △图为新创华《追光之旅 · 展望奥特曼60周年主题展》现场 常青IP版权格局：历史脉络与市场现状 在近期热闹看展的背后，不少消费者却感到困惑："哪家奥特曼展才是真正的官方展览？" △ 图为奇奥天尊《呼唤光的名字吧·经典奥特曼主题展》现场， 左右滑动查看更多 奥特曼这一经典IP已经走过了60年辉煌历程。自从1966年首次亮相以来，奥特曼系列作品逐渐扩展 至商品快消、漫画、电影、游戏、线下主题空间等领域。在中国市场，奥特曼已经从单纯的儿童向IP 迭代成为成年人也喜爱的常青IP。据数 ...

Core Insights - The overall sentiment in the anime and IP market is mixed, with some IPs like "Demon Slayer" driving significant revenue growth, while others like "Ultraman" and "Attack on Titan" are experiencing declines in income [1][25][36]. Group 1: Market Performance - The second quarter of 2025 saw a decline in revenue for several major IPs, with "Demon Slayer" contributing to a 50% increase in sales for Sony's animation and gaming sectors [1][36]. - Guangzhou's Anime Star City reported a 32% drop in revenue for Q2, despite maintaining a high occupancy rate of 99.8% [2]. - Wangfujing Joy Shopping Center, after strategic repositioning, saw a 48% increase in sales for the first half of 2025, although it still reported a loss of approximately 114 million yuan [4][6]. Group 2: IP-Specific Developments - Bandai's "Gundam" IP achieved a record sales figure of 103.2 billion yen in the first half of 2025, driven by the release of a new TV series and related merchandise [10][13]. - "Ultraman" faced a 1.47% decline in sales, with domestic sales plummeting by 66.96%, although overseas sales grew by 45.29% [25][27]. - Toho Animation reported a 6.79% increase in sales, primarily due to the strong performance of "One Piece" and "Dragon Ball" in overseas markets [36][42]. Group 3: Strategic Initiatives - Wangfujing Joy Shopping Center is transforming into a "New National Trend Shopping Center" to cater to the diverse needs of the Z generation [6]. - Sony is enhancing its IP development capabilities through strategic partnerships, including a significant investment in Kadokawa and collaboration with Bandai Namco [60][62]. - Sanrio's multi-character marketing strategy has proven successful, with a 47.4% increase in sales, particularly in the Chinese market, where sales surged by 91% [75][86].

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the issues surrounding the performance of the "Ultraman" children's theater show, highlighting consumer dissatisfaction due to high ticket prices and poor quality of the show, which has led to accusations of false advertising and misleading practices by the organizers [1][2][6]. Group 1: Consumer Experience and Complaints - Parents are willing to pay high prices for children's shows, but many have reported disappointing experiences, including missing promised features and poor production quality [1][2][4]. - Specific complaints include inadequate performance quality, such as poor lighting and sound, and costumes that do not meet expectations, leading to children being frightened during the show [4][6]. - Legal experts suggest that consumers may have grounds for claims under consumer protection laws due to misleading advertising and unmet promises [6][12]. Group 2: Licensing and Authorization Issues - The article reveals a complex licensing situation for the "Ultraman" IP, with multiple companies holding different rights, leading to inconsistencies in show quality and pricing [11][15]. - The core copyright holder, New Chuanghua, has stated that they have not authorized theater performances in cinemas, while another company, Qiao Tian Zun, has been found to offer significantly lower licensing fees, raising questions about the legitimacy of some performances [11][14]. - The historical context of licensing agreements dating back to 1976 has resulted in a fragmented and confusing rights landscape, impacting the quality and consistency of "Ultraman" performances in China [15][17]. Group 3: Market Impact and Future Considerations - The article notes that the "Ultraman" IP has significant commercial potential, with successful merchandise and media tie-ins, but the current licensing issues could hinder its long-term profitability [18][20]. - Industry experts emphasize the importance of proper rights management and the need for companies to establish robust licensing frameworks to avoid future disputes and maximize IP value [22]. - The ongoing copyright disputes and market confusion may damage the brand's reputation and consumer trust, which could have lasting effects on its market position [21][22].

Core Viewpoint - The article highlights the issues surrounding the performance of the "Ultraman" children's theater, particularly regarding high ticket prices, misleading advertising, and poor quality of the shows, leading to consumer dissatisfaction and potential legal implications for the companies involved [1][4][9]. Group 1: Performance Quality and Consumer Experience - The ticket price for the "Ultraman" show is six times that of a movie ticket, yet the promised benefits, such as a "VIP gift package," were not delivered, leading to disappointment among parents and children [2][3]. - Many parents reported that the performance quality was subpar, with inadequate stage production, poor lighting, and costumes that did not conceal performers' identities, resulting in a negative experience for children [3][4]. - Legal experts indicated that consumers could claim refunds based on misleading advertising and poor performance quality, as the high ticket prices were justified by promised additional benefits that were not fulfilled [4][9]. Group 2: Licensing and Authorization Issues - The article discusses the confusion surrounding the licensing of "Ultraman" performances, noting that multiple companies hold different rights to the IP, leading to significant discrepancies in performance quality and pricing [12][13]. - The core copyright holder, New Chuanghua, has not authorized cinema performances, while another company, Qiao Tian Zun, claims to have obtained rights through a historical contract, resulting in a chaotic licensing environment [11][12]. - The licensing fees for "Ultraman" performances can be as low as 3,000 yuan per show, raising questions about the authenticity and quality of the performances being offered in cinemas [8][12]. Group 3: Market Impact and Future Considerations - The article emphasizes the potential financial losses incurred by the original copyright holder, Round Valley, due to historical licensing decisions, estimating losses could reach hundreds of billions over the years [13][20]. - The "Ultraman" IP has significant commercial potential, with opportunities for revenue generation through merchandise, games, and theme parks, but the current licensing confusion undermines its value [13][20]. - Industry experts suggest that the future of IP management should focus on maintaining copyright integrity and developing robust licensing frameworks to avoid similar issues in the future [20].

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the issues surrounding the performance of the Ultraman children's theater, highlighting consumer dissatisfaction due to high ticket prices and poor quality of the shows, which raises concerns about misleading advertising and the authenticity of licensing agreements [2][5][7]. Group 1: Consumer Experience - Parents are willing to pay high prices for children's shows, but many report disappointment due to false advertising and poor performance quality [2][5]. - Specific complaints include missing promised perks, such as VIP packages, and subpar production values, leading to a negative experience for children [5][6]. - Legal experts suggest that consumers may have grounds for claims under consumer protection laws due to misleading advertising practices [7][16]. Group 2: Licensing and Authorization Issues - The Ultraman IP is highly lucrative, generating $7.4 billion in total revenue in 2024, ranking it as the 53rd most profitable IP globally [3]. - There are discrepancies in licensing fees, with some performances authorized for as low as 3,000 yuan, raising questions about the legitimacy of these licenses [3][15]. - The core copyright holder, New Chuanghua, has stated that they have not authorized theater performances in cinemas, indicating potential unauthorized use of the IP [15][17]. Group 3: Market Dynamics and Historical Context - The article outlines a complex licensing landscape where multiple companies hold different rights to the Ultraman IP, leading to inconsistent quality and consumer confusion [18][19]. - Historical contracts from 1976 have resulted in fragmented rights, complicating the current market and potentially leading to significant financial losses for the original copyright holder [19][24]. - The article emphasizes the importance of proper IP management and the need for companies to establish robust licensing frameworks to avoid future disputes and protect brand integrity [26].

Core Insights - The licensing fee for Ultraman is 250 million, which has the potential to activate a market worth billions, indicating significant growth opportunities in the IP sector [1] - However, the domestic IP landscape is becoming increasingly fragmented, with collaborations yielding diminishing returns, as the combined profits of local IPs do not match those of a single entity like LEGO [1] - The article raises the question of what constitutes a successful collaboration in the current market environment, suggesting that not all partnerships are equally beneficial [1] Industry Analysis - The Ultraman licensing fee of 250 million is a strategic move aimed at tapping into a market that could exceed 100 billion, highlighting the potential for lucrative IP ventures [1] - The trend of increasing collaborations among domestic IPs is leading to a dilution of profitability, as evidenced by the comparison with LEGO, which remains a dominant player with higher profit margins [1] - The article emphasizes the need for a reevaluation of collaboration strategies within the domestic IP market to ensure that partnerships are not only frequent but also financially viable [1]

Core Viewpoint - The company reported strong revenue and profit growth for the first half of 2025, with a 17.3% increase in revenue and a 30.6% increase in net profit attributable to shareholders, indicating robust operational performance and market positioning [1][2]. Financial Performance - The company achieved a revenue of 4.11 billion RMB and a net profit of 520 million RMB in the first half of 2025, with an EPS of 1.32 RMB [1]. - The gross margin decreased by 1 percentage point to 75.5%, while the expense ratio remained stable at 63.2% [2]. - Inventory increased by 7.2% year-on-year to 680 million RMB, with inventory turnover days decreasing by 5 days to 249 days [2]. - Operating net cash flow grew significantly by 77.5% to 390 million RMB [2]. Brand and Product Development - The main brand, Han Shu, maintained its leading position on the Douyin platform, ranking first among beauty brands and expanding its product line with new offerings [3]. - The company is actively pursuing a multi-brand strategy, launching new brands in various categories, including skincare, maternal and infant care, and cosmetics [3]. - New brands such as An Min You for sensitive skin and a high-end anti-aging brand TAZU are in development, alongside collaborations with well-known IPs for maternal and infant products [3]. Market Strategy and Outlook - The company is expected to benefit from its multi-brand strategy, which is anticipated to inject new growth momentum and enhance operational efficiency and profit margins [4]. - Profit forecasts for 2025, 2026, and 2027 have been adjusted upward to 1.16 billion RMB, 1.47 billion RMB, and 1.83 billion RMB, respectively, reflecting confidence in the company's growth trajectory [4].

Group 1: Company Overview - TOP TOY, a潮玩 brand under Miniso Group, recently received investment from Temasek, resulting in a post-investment valuation of approximately HKD 10 billion [1] - Established in December 2020, TOP TOY positions itself as a "global潮玩 collection store," offering over 10,000 SKUs across eight categories, with price ranges from 39 yuan to tens of thousands [1] - The company has adopted a dual-driven model of "licensed IP + original IP," with significant growth expected from its exclusive IP "Nommi糯米儿," projected to generate over 1 billion yuan in revenue across all channels in 2024 [1] Group 2: Industry Growth - The潮玩 market in China is in a rapid growth phase, with projections indicating that the industry scale will reach 110.1 billion yuan by 2026 [2] - A preliminary "IPO ladder" is forming in the潮玩 industry, with brands like 布鲁可 and 卡游 making significant strides towards public offerings, attracting substantial investor interest [2] - 布鲁可's IPO was notably successful, achieving a subscription rate of 6000 times during its offering phase, while 卡游 is expected to surpass 10 billion yuan in revenue in 2024 [2] Group 3: International Expansion - Leading潮玩 companies are prioritizing international expansion, with 泡泡玛特 establishing a localized global operation since 2018, achieving overseas revenue of 5.593 billion yuan in the first half of 2025, a year-on-year increase of 439.6% [3] - TOP TOY is expanding into Southeast Asia through a dual model of "store-in-store + independent stores," with its搪胶毛绒 series contributing 35% to overseas sales in Q1 2025 [3] - 布鲁可's overseas revenue share increased from 2% in 2024 to over 1 billion yuan in the first half of 2025, representing 8.3% of total revenue [3]

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the controversy surrounding a mural of Lu Xun smoking in a public space, highlighting the clash between cultural representation and public health concerns. Group 1: Public Health Concerns - The mural of Lu Xun smoking has led to gatherings of people lighting cigarettes, which poses health risks to others in a public space where smoking is prohibited [6][13]. - The image of a public figure smoking may mislead youth and have negative influences, prompting calls for its removal [7][9]. Group 2: Cultural Representation - Lu Xun is historically known to smoke, and the mural is not a fictional representation but an acknowledgment of his real-life habits [11][12]. - The discussion raises questions about how to appropriately present Lu Xun's image in a way that is respectful and comfortable for all visitors [21]. Group 3: Misplaced Blame and Responsibility - The article argues that blaming the mural for smoking behavior is an error in attribution, suggesting that the focus should be on managing public smoking rather than altering cultural depictions [15][17]. - It emphasizes that educating youth about smoking should involve discussing Lu Xun's life and struggles with smoking rather than censoring his image [23][25]. Group 4: Broader Context of Complaints - The article critiques a trend where parents and individuals excessively complain about media representations, suggesting it reflects a lack of personal responsibility in guiding children [41][44]. - It highlights the absurdity of expecting all societal content to cater exclusively to children’s sensitivities, arguing for a balanced approach to education and exposure [49][50]. Group 5: Smoking Alternatives and Controversies - The article mentions a complainant who supports nicotine pouches, raising questions about the motives behind the complaint against the mural [52][54]. - It discusses the health risks associated with nicotine, suggesting that alternatives marketed as safer may still pose significant health threats [55][61].