央视网消息：春节的脚步越来越近，在各地，公共文化服务的内容也越来越有文化味。等车间隙读一段典籍，在科学知识的海洋里过寒 假。大家在即将开启新岁时，再获新知。 最近，在北京京港地铁16号线国家图书馆站，开启"这一站，遇见千年色彩"主题阅读活动。地铁进站厅精选《万国衣冠拜冕旒：唐代卷》 《国色雅宋》等数种精选图书，以及流光溢彩的瓷器、宋锦，和天青、松花、绛纱等中国传统色彩艺术装置。从唐朝的华丽奔放到宋代的雅致 婉约，等车的间隙，旅客能读完一个关于胭脂红或天青色的奇妙篇章。国家图书馆副馆长霍瑞娟介绍，《全民阅读促进条例》中强调文化机构 要充分和这种社会力量开展合作，图书馆的典籍资源，像《尚书》，还有《山海经》关于色彩的一些表述，利用地铁空间开展合作，打造人人 可读、处处阅读、实时能读的文化阅读场景。北京京港地铁公共关系新闻发言人杨苓表示，京港所辖5条线路，每日平均客流达200多万，这样 的文化活动让地铁够成为城市文化传播平台。 这个寒假，甘肃科技馆内推出46场"科技狂欢季"主题活动。"动物的眼睛看世界"活动中，孩子们通过昆虫复眼眼镜，感受昆虫看世界的样 子；"神奇能量源"活动中，孩子们学会以盐水发电，用电极驱动小车 ...

Core Viewpoint - The exchange and collision of literature and culture between China and Russia are likened to two ancient rivers converging in the depths of the Eurasian continent, creating a rich tapestry of mutual resonance and cultural dialogue [1] Group 1: Conference Overview - The conference held from November 26 to 29, 2025, at Nanjing University focused on "Classical and Modern Chinese-Russian Literature," featuring scholars from both countries engaging in multidimensional discussions [1] - The event highlighted the importance of classical literature as a foundation for cultural traditions and modern literature as a key connection to the present and future [1] Group 2: Thematic Presentations - The first session addressed the contemporary significance and methodological innovation of classical literature, emphasizing the need to transcend historical materialism in Chinese classical literature research [4] - The second session explored the regional diversity and high quality of contemporary Chinese literature recognized by Russian readers, showcasing the dynamics of literary dissemination [5] - The third session involved theoretical dialogues and comparative analyses, revealing the potential for mutual learning between Chinese and Russian poetics [6] - The fourth session focused on historical memory and East Asian dissemination, illustrating the depth of Sino-Russian literary exchanges and their role in cultural communication [7]

Core Insights - The reconstruction of classical studies in China is gaining momentum, with a focus on integrating traditional Chinese texts and culture into a cohesive academic framework [1][6] - The study of the "Book of Documents" (尚书) has evolved significantly, transitioning from a sacred text to a subject of historical and literary analysis, reflecting broader changes in academic paradigms [2][3] Group 1: Evolution of Classical Studies - Since the 1970s, there has been an increase in the understanding of pre-Qin and Han texts, leading to calls for the reconstruction of classical studies to address the limitations of specialized disciplines [1] - The establishment of "Chinese Classical Studies Departments" in major universities aims to create a more integrative approach to the study of ancient culture [1] - The shift from specialized disciplines to a more holistic understanding of classical texts is seen as essential for developing interdisciplinary talent [1] Group 2: Research Paradigms in "Book of Documents" - The research paradigm of the "Book of Documents" has shifted from a focus on its sacredness to a more value-neutral analysis, allowing for a critical examination of its historical context [2][3] - The modern study of the "Book of Documents" can be categorized into three main schools: Traditional, New Evidence, and Historical Critique, each employing different methodologies and perspectives [3] - Recent studies have integrated various disciplines such as geography, sociology, and anthropology, showcasing a cross-disciplinary approach to understanding ancient texts [3] Group 3: New Directions in Research - In the 21st century, the focus of "Book of Documents" research has shifted towards the mutual verification of excavated and transmitted texts, as well as cross-cultural comparisons [4][5] - New methodologies, such as the examination of "system-carrier-ritual" relationships, are replacing traditional text-centric studies, emphasizing the text's role in political and social contexts [5][6] - The integration of digital humanities is transforming the research landscape, allowing for the creation of structured data from classical texts and facilitating interdisciplinary collaboration [7][8]

Core Viewpoint - The difficulty of reading ancient texts stems from complex language, the vast number of available texts, and the significant cultural and philosophical distance from contemporary understanding [2][3]. Group 1: Challenges in Reading Ancient Texts - The first challenge is the complexity of the language, where readers often recognize individual characters but struggle to grasp the overall meaning [2]. - The second challenge is the sheer volume of ancient texts, with over 200,000 existing works, including more than 3,400 titles in the "Siku Quanshu," totaling approximately 800 million characters [2]. - The third challenge is the cultural and philosophical differences, as ancient ethical norms and worldviews can be vastly different from modern perspectives [2]. Group 2: Importance of Reading Ancient Texts - Ancient texts serve as a material carrier of traditional culture, preserving the wisdom of past generations, such as Confucius's reflections in "Lunyu" and Sima Qian's historical insights in "Shiji" [3]. - These texts contain high-level skills in language expression and thought, exemplified by concise yet profound works like "Zuo Zhuan" and "Zhuangzi" [3]. Group 3: Approaches to Reading Ancient Texts - To effectively read ancient texts, one must cultivate interest and discipline, as these texts offer rich humanistic wisdom and life insights [4]. - Modern readers have access to useful tools such as the "Dictionary of Common Ancient Chinese Characters" and various bibliographic works, which facilitate understanding and selection of texts [3].