《蒙娜丽莎》
Search documents
被迫关门的卢浮宫重新开放
Xin Lang Cai Jing· 2025-12-17 13:56
临时关闭的法国卢浮宫17日开放了部分展厅。据法国媒体报道,包括《蒙娜丽莎》在内的部分展品已向 公众开放。卢浮宫当天在社交媒体上发布公告说,卢浮宫已于当天上午开放,但受罢工影响,部分展厅 仍暂时关闭。 ...
建筑物年久失修,数百件文献受损,卢浮宫埃及古物图书馆发生严重漏水
Huan Qiu Shi Bao· 2025-12-08 22:51
【环球时报驻法国特派记者 尚凯元 环球时报记者 周扬】法国卢浮宫博物馆近日承认馆内发生严重漏水事故,导致数百本历史书籍和文献损毁。 这一事件再次将卢浮宫年久失修的现状推向舆论焦点,而数周前发生的珠宝抢劫案,更让此次漏水事件被外界视为管理层长期疏于职守的又一证 据。 法国媒体《艺术论坛报》称,就在图书馆漏水问题长期悬而未决之际,博物馆却斥资27.6万欧元为馆长办公室添置设计师家具——而该办公室恰 恰位于受损图书馆附近。"这再次表明卢浮宫已偏离正轨,忽视核心使命,转而追求虚幻目标。"《艺术论坛报》的创始人里克纳写道。数据显 示,2018年至2023年间,卢浮宫在新藏品收购上花费约1.054亿欧元,而在建筑维护与升级方面仅投入2670万欧元。"博物馆应优先修复建筑本 身,"里克纳强调,"当前管理团队已无法胜任这一工作"。 为应对财政压力,卢浮宫于11月下旬宣布提高非欧盟游客门票价格,国际游客需支付32欧元,涨幅高达45%。博物馆方面称,此举预计每年可增 加约2000万欧元收入,专项用于基础设施改善。作为全球参观人数最多的博物馆,卢浮宫在2024年接待了870万人次游客,其中69%来自海外。 目前,卢浮宫方面已启动一 ...
虚拟现实旅游体验世界名胜
Sou Hu Cai Jing· 2025-12-05 11:54
VR旅游的核心魅力在于其突破时空限制的能力。以埃及金字塔为例,传统游客只能站在景区外围远观,而VR体验则能带领用 户深入法老墓室,近距离观察壁画细节,甚至通过虚拟重建技术,还原金字塔建造初期的宏伟景象。这种超越物理边界的探 索,不仅满足了人们对未知世界的好奇心,更在文化遗产保护领域展现出独特价值——许多濒危或已损毁的历史遗迹,正通过 数字技术获得永恒的"生命"。 从技术实现来看,VR旅游体验依赖于多重科技的融合。高精度激光扫描技术能够以毫米级精度捕捉文物细节,8K全景摄影确保 视觉呈现的清晰度,而AI算法则负责构建逼真的光影效果和物理交互。在参观卢浮宫时,用户不仅能360度欣赏《蒙娜丽莎》, 还能通过手势操作"放大"画面的笔触纹理,这种多感官的沉浸体验是传统影像无法比拟的。部分高端VR系统甚至加入了温度模 拟和气味释放功能,当用户"漫步"在阿尔卑斯雪山时,能感受到微凉的空气和松木的清香。 在数字技术飞速发展的今天,虚拟现实(VR)正悄然改变着人们探索世界的方式。当物理旅行的限制逐渐显现,VR旅游以其 独特的沉浸式体验,为渴望远方的灵魂打开了一扇通往全球名胜的数字窗口。这项技术并非简单地将风景搬进屏幕,而是通过 ...
【史海回眸】1911年《蒙娜丽莎》被盗,万人“参观空墙”
Huan Qiu Shi Bao· 2025-11-06 22:48
Core Viewpoint - The recent robbery at the Louvre Museum has raised significant concerns about its security measures, which are reportedly outdated and inadequate, despite warnings from French security authorities [1][11]. Group 1: Robbery Incident - Four suspects have been charged in connection with the major robbery at the Louvre Museum that occurred in mid-October, but most of the stolen jewelry remains missing [1]. - The Louvre has a history of thefts, with the most notable being the theft of the painting "Mona Lisa" [1]. Group 2: Historical Context of Theft - The "Mona Lisa," painted by Leonardo da Vinci, was stolen in 1911 by Vincenzo Peruggia, who had previously worked at the Louvre and was familiar with its layout [2][4]. - Peruggia successfully stole the painting by disguising himself as a museum worker and was aided by a plumber who mistakenly thought he was a colleague [4][5]. Group 3: Security Concerns - Following the theft of the "Mona Lisa," the Louvre implemented enhanced security measures, including increased patrols and barriers to protect the artwork [9]. - Despite improvements for the "Mona Lisa," other artworks at the Louvre have been stolen, indicating ongoing security vulnerabilities [10][11]. - Reports from 2014 indicated that the Louvre was using outdated computer systems and simple passwords for its security operations, which had not been modernized despite warnings from security authorities [11].
卢浮宫安防为啥这么脆弱
Jing Ji Ri Bao· 2025-10-24 22:17
Core Points - The recent theft of eight treasures from the Louvre in just seven minutes has raised serious concerns about the museum's security measures, which are perceived as inadequate [1][2] - A report from the French Court of Auditors revealed that about one-third of the Louvre's 800 exhibition halls lack effective surveillance cameras, highlighting a broader issue of insufficient funding for security across many museums globally [2][3] - Critics argue that the Louvre's management has misallocated its budget, prioritizing celebrations and special exhibitions over essential security measures, which has led to a decline in the effectiveness of its security systems [3] Summary by Sections Security Concerns - The Louvre's security system has been criticized for being "fragile," with historical incidents of theft and vandalism prompting only incremental improvements over the years [1] - The recent theft incident has reignited discussions about the museum's security capabilities, which remain a concern despite past efforts to enhance protection [2] Funding Issues - Many museums, including the Louvre, face significant financial challenges in establishing high-quality security systems, balancing the need for public access to art with operational and security costs [2] - The British Museum and the Metropolitan Museum of Art in New York also struggle with funding, leading to operational deficits and inadequate security measures [2] Management and Operational Challenges - The Louvre's management has been criticized for not prioritizing the safety of cultural heritage, with budget allocations favoring events over security [3] - Increased visitor numbers, projected to reach 8.7 million in 2024, have added pressure on security staff, who have seen a reduction in their ranks over the past 15 years, leading to burnout and decreased vigilance [3]
重开首日,《环球时报》记者探访卢浮宫:游客参观热情依旧高涨
Huan Qiu Shi Bao· 2025-10-23 22:52
Core Viewpoint - The Louvre Museum in Paris reopened to the public on October 22, just three days after a significant theft, with heightened security measures in place and a strong interest from visitors to witness the aftermath of the incident [1][4]. Group 1: Incident Overview - The theft occurred on October 19, when thieves disguised as maintenance workers used a lift to access the Apollo Gallery, triggering an alarm shortly after their entry [4]. - The museum's management acknowledged failures in identifying suspicious activities and highlighted weaknesses in external security measures, including outdated surveillance equipment [4][5]. Group 2: Visitor Reactions - Despite the recent theft, visitor enthusiasm remained high, with long queues at the entrance and many expressing a desire to see the site of the crime [1][3]. - Some visitors expressed anger over the museum's inadequate security, while others remained optimistic about the experience despite the closure of the theft site [3]. Group 3: Security Enhancements - The Louvre plans to initiate a security upgrade project with a budget exceeding €80 million (approximately $85 million) by early 2026 to enhance its protective measures against organized theft [5]. - French President Macron has called for expedited implementation of security measures at the museum following the incident [5].
卢浮宫,不是第一次被劫了
Hu Xiu· 2025-10-21 06:56
Core Points - The Louvre Museum in Paris experienced a meticulously planned armed robbery on October 19, where masked thieves disguised as workers infiltrated the museum and stole several priceless jewels within seven minutes [1][2][3] - This incident highlights ongoing security challenges faced by the Louvre, which has a history of significant thefts [2][3] Summary by Sections Incident Details - The robbery involved multiple masked assailants who used a construction area near the Seine River to access the museum via a truck lift [1] - The thieves managed to steal eight pieces of jewelry, including crowns, necklaces, and brooches, all deemed to have "immeasurable historical value" [10][6][12] Historical Context - The Louvre has faced several notable security breaches in the past, including the theft of the "Mona Lisa" in 1911 and other significant art pieces over the years [3][13][14][15][16] - These historical incidents underscore the museum's persistent security vulnerabilities, despite its status as a world-renowned art institution [3][2]
案发点离《蒙娜丽莎》仅250米,卢浮宫遭窃更多细节披露→
第一财经· 2025-10-20 07:54
Core Viewpoint - The recent robbery at the Louvre Museum has raised significant concerns regarding the effectiveness of its security measures, especially given the high-profile nature of the stolen artifacts and the audacity of the crime occurring in broad daylight [3][6][9]. Security Measures and Vulnerabilities - The robbery occurred just 30 minutes after the museum opened, with the assailants using a lift to access the interior from an external balcony, highlighting a critical security flaw [6][12]. - Despite the museum's claims of strict security protocols, the incident revealed that the protection of over 33,000 artifacts is not foolproof, as the assailants managed to bypass security measures [12]. - The Louvre's alarm system was reportedly functioning, but there are questions about whether security personnel were alerted or if the alarms sounded in the exhibition area where the robbery took place [9][12]. Response and Criticism - Following the incident, French officials acknowledged the need for improved security, noting that recent upgrades included new surveillance systems and a central security command center [12]. - Critics argue that these security enhancements have come too late, as evidenced by the successful execution of the robbery [13]. - The museum has faced previous security challenges, including staff complaints about inadequate personnel to manage the high volume of visitors, which has led to strikes [9].
损失惨重!卢浮宫大劫案背后:运营成本一年22亿元,15年约200个全职岗位遭裁撤!现场亲历者称“两次被疏散,工作人员神情紧张”
Mei Ri Jing Ji Xin Wen· 2025-10-20 07:41
Core Points - A significant robbery occurred at the Louvre Museum in Paris on October 19, where thieves disguised as construction workers stole nine valuable pieces of jewelry from the Napoleonic era in just seven minutes [1][11][19] - The incident highlights the vulnerabilities in the security system of French museums, particularly the Louvre, which has faced multiple thefts over the past century [1][19] - The museum has reportedly reduced its security staff by approximately 200 full-time positions over the past 15 years, impacting its ability to maintain adequate security measures [1][21] Summary by Sections Incident Details - The robbery was executed by a group of three to four individuals who arrived at the museum disguised as construction workers and used a lift to access the building [11][13] - The thieves targeted the Apollo Gallery, breaking into high-security display cases and triggering the alarm system during the theft [13][19] - The stolen items included crowns and jewelry that belonged to historical figures such as Queen Marie-Amélie and Empress Eugénie, with one crown later found abandoned outside the museum [18][19] Visitor Experience - Visitors reported confusion and concern during the evacuation process, with multiple evacuations occurring as the situation unfolded [3][6][8] - The atmosphere was tense, with a significant police presence responding to the incident [8][11] Security and Financial Implications - The Louvre's operational costs for 2024 are projected to be €267.2 million (approximately 2.2 billion RMB), with a significant portion allocated to personnel costs [21] - The museum's financial reports indicate a total revenue of €301.9 million (approximately 2.5 billion RMB) for the same year, highlighting the economic scale of the institution [21] - The French government has initiated a "New Renaissance" plan for the Louvre, which includes enhancing security measures with an estimated budget of $930 million [21]
案发点离《蒙娜丽莎》250米 卢浮宫为何发生“大劫案”
Xin Hua Wang· 2025-10-20 06:26
Core Points - The Louvre Museum in Paris experienced a rare daylight robbery on October 19, raising questions about its security measures [1][4] - The robbery involved four masked individuals who used a lift to access the museum and stole nine priceless artifacts, with a significant portion still missing [2][4] - The incident has prompted discussions about the adequacy of security protocols at one of the world's most visited museums [4][7] Group 1: Incident Details - The robbery occurred around 9:30 AM, just 30 minutes after the museum opened, and was only 250 meters from the famous painting, the Mona Lisa [2] - The entire operation lasted approximately 7 minutes, during which the robbers threatened security personnel with a power tool [2] - Among the stolen items are royal crowns and jewelry associated with historical figures, with one crown already recovered [2] Group 2: Security Concerns - The Louvre has a history of thefts, with the most notable being the disappearance of the Mona Lisa in 1911 [4] - Despite having a functioning alarm system, there are doubts about whether security personnel were alerted during the robbery [4] - Staff complaints about understaffing and high visitor numbers have previously raised concerns about security effectiveness [4][7] Group 3: Response and Criticism - The French Interior Minister stated that security measures at the Louvre have been enhanced in recent years, including new surveillance systems [7] - Critics argue that these improvements are insufficient and have come too late, highlighting vulnerabilities in the museum's security [7]