Core Viewpoint - The "one-price" model in the ride-hailing industry, initially favored for its price transparency, is now facing controversy due to the suspension of this pricing strategy in multiple regions, highlighting a shift from innovation to a dilemma caused by a singular focus on price competition, neglecting driver rights, service quality, and sustainable industry development [1] Group 1 - The "one-price" model has led to a price war among platforms, resulting in prices being driven below operational costs, which ultimately shifts the cost burden onto drivers, reducing their income and service motivation [1][2] - The normalization of "more work for less pay" among drivers has led to a decline in service quality and passenger experience, contradicting the original intent of the "one-price" model to ensure transparent consumption [1][2] Group 2 - To resolve the current dilemma, it is essential to abandon the singular focus on price and establish a multi-dimensional value balance, including a minimum income guarantee for drivers to ensure fair compensation and service stability [2][3] - Platforms should eliminate mandatory order acceptance rules, allowing drivers to choose whether to accept "one-price" orders based on their circumstances, thus respecting their autonomy and preventing forced low pricing [2] Group 3 - There is a need to promote a reasonable match between service value and price, replacing low-price competition with differentiated competition by designing various products tailored to different passenger needs [2][3] - Regulatory bodies should guide the market to prevent platforms from abusing their market position to enforce low prices while allowing space for reasonable value innovation, ensuring that market competition occurs within a regulated framework [3] Group 4 - The value of the ride-hailing industry should not be defined solely by price but should also encompass fair driver rights, quality passenger experiences, and sustainable industry development, aiming for a win-win ecosystem among platforms, drivers, and passengers [3]

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the challenges and implications of the fixed pricing model ("one-price") in ride-hailing services, highlighting the tension between passenger affordability and driver income stability [4][60]. Group 1: Pricing Model - The "one-price" model offers a fixed fare based on estimated distance and time, providing certainty for passengers but imposing risks on drivers who bear the cost of unexpected delays [14][19]. - This pricing strategy has led to a significant increase in complaints from drivers, who feel that they are unfairly penalized during traffic congestion, as they do not receive additional compensation for delays [50][52]. Group 2: Driver Experience - Many drivers express frustration with the "one-price" model, stating that it limits their ability to earn a fair wage, especially during peak hours or in congested areas [44][47]. - The average income for drivers is reported to be low, with many earning less than 300 yuan per day, and a significant portion of their earnings coming from "one-price" rides [56][57]. Group 3: Market Saturation - The ride-hailing market is experiencing saturation, with an increasing number of drivers competing for a limited number of rides, leading to a decline in overall earnings [59][60]. - The article notes that regulatory warnings about market saturation have been issued, advising caution for new entrants into the ride-hailing industry [56][59]. Group 4: Platform Adjustments - In response to driver feedback, platforms have attempted to adjust their pricing models, including testing minimum income guarantees and introducing compensation for delays [61][81]. - Despite these efforts, the article suggests that the fundamental issues with the "one-price" model remain unresolved, indicating a need for a more nuanced approach to pricing that reflects real-time conditions [64][82].

Core Viewpoint - The article highlights issues with ride-hailing services where drivers are implementing arbitrary quiz questions as a condition for accepting rides, particularly for low-priced "one-price" orders, indicating a deeper problem with pricing models and driver compensation [1][8][10]. Group 1: Driver Behavior - Drivers are requiring passengers to answer questions or provide codes before accepting rides, with incorrect answers leading to ride cancellations [1][3]. - Many drivers are resorting to these tactics due to low earnings from "one-price" orders, which often do not cover their operational costs [8][10]. - Drivers face penalties for refusing rides, leading them to adopt indirect methods of rejecting low-paying orders [10]. Group 2: Pricing Issues - The low pricing of "one-price" orders is a significant factor, with examples showing drivers earning as little as 2.6 yuan for a 1.79 km ride while needing to travel 5.01 km to pick up passengers [8]. - The current pricing model does not adequately balance operational costs, resulting in drivers being unable to sustain their income [8][13]. - Experts suggest that platforms need to optimize their pricing models to include factors like pickup distance and improve cancellation rules to protect both drivers and passengers [13]. Group 3: Passenger Experience - Passengers often choose "one-price" options for their affordability and to avoid issues like detours or speed limit violations by drivers [10]. - However, the low prices can lead to negative experiences, such as drivers refusing to use air conditioning during hot weather due to cost concerns [8]. Group 4: Regulatory Recommendations - Legal experts indicate that drivers' refusal to accept rides constitutes a breach of contract, allowing passengers to file complaints [8]. - There is a call for regulatory intervention to establish price guidelines and help the industry move away from low-price traps that compromise service quality [13].

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the issues faced by ride-hailing drivers and passengers due to low pricing strategies implemented by platforms, leading to a breakdown in service quality and contractual obligations [1][9][12]. Group 1: Driver Challenges - Drivers are using arbitrary questions to cancel rides as a way to avoid low-paying orders, which they find unprofitable [4][9]. - Some drivers receive as little as 2.6 yuan for rides under 2 kilometers, making it difficult to sustain their operations [9]. - The low pricing model forces drivers into a position where they must accept orders that do not cover their costs, leading to potential losses [9][11]. Group 2: Passenger Experience - Passengers opt for fixed-price rides primarily for cost savings and to avoid issues like detours or speed limit violations by drivers [15]. - The low prices offered by platforms attract passengers but ultimately harm both drivers and passengers due to the resulting service quality issues [11][12]. Group 3: Platform Responsibility - The article highlights that the low-price competition among ride-hailing platforms creates a detrimental cycle for both drivers and passengers, undermining long-term trust [12][17]. - Platforms are criticized for prioritizing low prices over service quality, which leads to a negative experience for all parties involved [11][17].