Core Insights - The article provides an overview of fund managers' perspectives and strategies based on their recent quarterly reports, highlighting different investment styles and market outlooks [1][2]. Group 1: Fund Manager Perspectives - Fund managers express varying views on market conditions, with some maintaining optimism about equity assets due to low interest rates and the potential for corporate earnings recovery [17][18]. - Different investment styles are categorized, including deep value, growth value, balanced, and growth styles, each with distinct characteristics and focus areas [19][35][51]. Group 2: Deep Value Style - Deep value managers focus on low valuation metrics such as low P/E ratios and high dividend yields, primarily investing in sectors like finance, real estate, and energy [10][12]. - Historical performance shows that this style performed well in 2016-2017 and 2021-2024, while underperforming in 2019-2020 [15][16]. Group 3: Growth Value Style - Growth value managers prioritize companies with strong profitability and stable cash flows, often holding stocks for the long term [20][22]. - Concerns about market risks and valuation levels are noted, with some managers highlighting the extreme valuation disparities across sectors [22][24]. Group 4: Balanced Style - Balanced style managers seek a combination of growth and value, focusing on companies with favorable PEG ratios and exploring opportunities across various sectors [35][36]. - They emphasize the importance of maintaining a diversified portfolio while identifying high-quality investment opportunities [40][46]. Group 5: Growth Style - Growth style managers focus on high revenue and earnings growth, often investing in emerging industries such as AI, renewable energy, and technology [51][62]. - The article notes a shift in focus from technology to consumer sectors as the market stabilizes, with an emphasis on identifying companies with strong growth potential [55][58]. Group 6: Market Outlook - The overall market sentiment is cautiously optimistic, with expectations of continued structural opportunities despite potential short-term volatility [40][62]. - Fund managers are adjusting their portfolios in response to macroeconomic conditions, focusing on sectors with strong growth prospects and managing risks associated with high valuations [31][70].

Core Viewpoint - The 2024 version of the non-collaborative fund portfolio underperformed the Wind Mixed Equity Fund Index, with a return of 4.46% compared to the index's 8.86% increase, highlighting the challenges faced by many funds in adapting to the market conditions post the "9.24" rally [2][3]. Fund Performance Summary - The top-performing funds include: - China Merchants Quantitative Selection A: 18.15% - Dongfanghong New Power A: 17.64% - Other funds showed significantly lower returns, with some even reporting negative performance, such as: - Jiashi Value Selection A: -0.45% - Guotou Ruili LOF: -2.69% [5]. 2025 Version Selection Criteria - The selection rules for the 2025 version of the non-collaborative portfolio have been slightly adjusted: - All quantitative funds were excluded to avoid data interference, meaning funds like China Merchants Quantitative Selection will not be included [6]. - A requirement was set that the top industry market capitalization should be below 15% to prevent over-concentration in specific sectors [6]. - Funds must have outperformed the Wind Mixed Equity Fund Index for three consecutive years from 2022 to 2024 [7]. Non-Collaborative Fund Definition - The definition of non-collaborative funds is based on the frequency of stock holdings across funds, with a median holding frequency of less than 105 being the threshold for inclusion [9]. Final Fund List - After applying the filtering criteria, only 10 funds remained eligible for the non-collaborative portfolio, showcasing a mix of familiar and new fund managers [10][13].