天弘品质价值混合A虽仅获4197户认购，但户均认购金额高企，透露出浓厚的机构资金偏好。另一端， 博时卓睿成长股票A认购总户数不足两千，仅1946户参与，募集规模也暂居末位。 "投资者对这些公司的信任度较高，更愿意购买其发行的产品。"中国企业资本联盟副理事长柏文喜对 《华夏时报》记者表示，东方红、易方达、平安等老牌基金公司经过多年发展，积累了良好的品牌声誉 | 证券简称 | 发行规模 | 基金 | 发行日期 | 北金 | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | | (亿元) | 经理 | | 成立日 | | 东方红核心价值A | 19.91 | 局云 | 2025-05-27 | 2025-06-06 | | 易方达成长进取A | 17.03 | 刘健维 | 2025-05-27 | 2025-06-19 | | 平安价值优享A | 13.22 | 何杰 | 2025-05-27 | 2025-06-20 | | 银华成长智选A | 9.93 | 王彦川 | 2025-05-27 | 2025-06-20 | | 天弘品质价值A | 9.84 | 贾腾 | 2025-05-27 | ...

其中，东方红核心价值混合A由东方红资管"老将"周云掌舵，Wind数据显示，周云管理的东方红京东大数据A和东方红新动力A任职回报率分别为196.86%和 178.04%。值得注意的是，此前东方红资管以自有资金1000万元认购该基金，并承诺锁定三年，这一举措向市场传递出强烈信心。从销售节奏看，该基金仅 用9个交易日便完成募集，创下浮动费率基金最快募集纪录。 易方达成长进取混合A则以4.73万户的认购户数成为首批浮动费率产品中触达最广泛投资者的"人气王"，户均认购金额仅3.6万元，基金经理刘健维个人认购 超百万份，其管理的易方达科讯混合基金过去五年累计收益率达20.49%。 平安价值优享混合A凭借15034户认购户数紧随其后，该产品由何杰管理，记者注意到，何杰管理的平安价值远见混合基金今年以来收益率达10.84%，显著 跑赢基准。产品设计上，该基金采用"持有期+业绩报酬"双阶梯收费模式，当持有期满一年且年化收益超6%时，管理费率阶梯式提升，这种设计既鼓励长期 持有，又强化了管理人与投资者的利益绑定。 尾部产品遇冷：博时卓睿成长规模不足3亿 近日，多家公募基金相继发布公告称，旗下新型浮动费率基金正式成立。据统计，截至 ...

Core Insights - The first batch of floating rate funds has been established, with a total scale of 12.6 billion yuan and an average fund size of 969 million yuan, indicating strong investor participation [1][2] - The floating rate fund mechanism links management fees directly to performance, marking a significant shift in the public fund fee structure [4][5] - The rapid fundraising of these funds is attributed to policy benefits, market timing, and product innovation, suggesting a new phase for the public fund industry focused on performance-driven strategies [3][5] Fund Establishment - As of June 21, 13 floating rate funds have been established, with the top three funds being Dongfanghong Core Value Mixed A, Yifangda Growth Progress Mixed A, and Ping An Value Enjoyment Mixed A, collectively accounting for nearly 40% of the total scale [2] - The average number of subscriptions per fund is approximately 11,500, with the highest being 47,301 for Yifangda Growth Progress Mixed A [2] Fee Structure - The floating rate mechanism replaces the traditional fixed management fee model, with fees based on holding period and annualized returns [4] - This structure reduces opportunity costs for investors, as management fees decrease when fund performance is below expectations, while higher fees correspond to better performance, aligning interests between investors and managers [4] Industry Impact - The floating rate mechanism presents both opportunities and challenges for fund managers, compelling them to enhance their research and investment capabilities [5] - The emergence of floating rate funds is expected to accelerate the transition of the public fund industry from a scale-driven model to a performance-driven one [5]