Core Viewpoint - The China Securities Regulatory Commission (CSRC) has released an "Action Plan for Promoting the High-Quality Development of Public Funds," which links fund managers' compensation to long-term performance, addressing the industry's focus on scale over returns [2] Group 1: Fund Manager Compensation - Fund managers with products underperforming their benchmarks by more than 10 percentage points over three years will see a significant decrease in their performance-based compensation [2] - Conversely, fund managers whose performance significantly exceeds benchmarks may see reasonable increases in their compensation [2] Group 2: Underperforming Funds - As of May 21, nearly 6000 public funds have been managed for over three years, with 1341 funds underperforming their benchmarks by over 10 percentage points, involving 735 fund managers [3] - Among these, 31 funds have underperformed their benchmarks by over 50 percentage points, including notable managers like Yao Zhipeng from Harvest Fund and Shi Cheng from Guotai Junan [3] - The worst performer is Morgan Fund's Guo Chen, whose fund has a cumulative return of -23.03%, lagging behind the benchmark by 128 percentage points [3] Group 3: High-Performing Funds - There are 543 funds that have outperformed their benchmarks by over 10 percentage points, with 33 funds exceeding benchmarks by over 50 percentage points [6] - Notable high performers include the Huaxia North Exchange Innovation Small and Medium Enterprises Fund, managed by Guo Xin, which achieved a cumulative return of 194%, surpassing its benchmark by 176 percentage points [6][7] - The North Exchange theme funds have emerged as a concentrated area of excess returns, with several funds exceeding their benchmarks by over 60 percentage points [7] Group 4: Adjustments to Performance Benchmarks - In response to the new action plan, many fund companies have begun to adjust their performance benchmarks, with over 100 funds changing their benchmarks by May 26 [8][10] - Adjustments are made to ensure benchmarks accurately reflect the risk-return characteristics of the funds, addressing previous inadequacies in benchmark design [10][11] - The CSRC emphasizes the need for strict regulation of benchmark selection and modification to ensure alignment with investment strategies and product positioning [11]

Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the news is the introduction of a new policy by the China Securities Regulatory Commission (CSRC) aimed at enhancing the long-term performance of public fund managers by linking their compensation to the performance of their funds relative to benchmarks [2][3] - The policy targets fund managers whose products have underperformed their benchmarks by more than 10 percentage points over three years, leading to a significant reduction in their performance-based compensation [2][3] - The initiative is expected to align the interests of fund managers with those of investors, encouraging a shift away from short-term speculation towards a focus on long-term investment capabilities [2][3] Group 2 - As of May 21, 2023, there are 5,898 public funds managed by fund managers with over three years of experience, with 1,341 funds underperforming their benchmarks by over 10 percentage points [3][4] - Among these, 31 funds have underperformed their benchmarks by more than 50 percentage points, including notable funds managed by well-known managers such as Zheng Chengran from GF Fund and Yao Zhipeng from Harvest Fund [3][4][5] - The worst-performing fund, Morgan Small Cap A, managed by Guo Chen, has a cumulative return of -23.03% over three years, underperforming its benchmark by 127.69 percentage points [4][5] Group 3 - Conversely, there are 543 funds that have outperformed their benchmarks by over 10 percentage points, with 33 funds exceeding their benchmarks by more than 50 percentage points [7][9] - The top-performing fund, Huaxia North Exchange Innovation Small and Medium Enterprises Selected Fund, managed by Gu Xin Feng, achieved a cumulative return of 194.13%, surpassing its benchmark by 175.89 percentage points [9][10] - The North Exchange theme funds have emerged as a significant area for excess returns, with several funds exceeding their benchmarks by over 60 percentage points [10] Group 4 - In response to the new policy, many fund companies are adjusting their performance benchmarks to better reflect the risk-return characteristics of their funds [11][12] - Recent adjustments include changes to benchmarks for various funds, such as the adjustment of the performance benchmark for the浦银安盛稳健增利债券 from "CSI All Bond Index" to a more complex composite benchmark [11][12] - The trend of benchmark adjustments is expected to continue as fund companies seek to align their performance metrics with regulatory expectations and improve their competitive positioning [13][14]

文 | 银行螺丝钉 （转载请注明出处） 有朋友问螺丝钉，能不能针对 全球股票指数、美债指数等 ， 做个估值表。 目前内地能买到的、投资海外市场的基金品种不多。 A股中证全指本周下跌1.28%，恒生指数下跌1.1%。 亚太地区股票市场普遍下跌，韩股、日股本周下跌3%。 不过在海外这些品种比较丰富。 可以先从指数估值的角度，了解海外市场不同品种的估值情况。 螺丝钉也做了美股、全球股票指数、美债指数的估值表。见文章下面图片。 也新增了美股场内的美债ETF指数的估值。 如果觉得这个估值表 有需要 ， 后续每周日会在公众号、以及「 今天几星 」小程序，每周定期更新。 海外市场指数数量很多，后面大家 有希望增加的品种 ，可以反馈给螺丝钉。 目前螺丝钉后台系统，已经覆盖海外主流的几百只指数品种。 1. 本周全球股票市场整体下跌。 全球股票市场指数，本周下跌1.6%。 2. 市场波动也跟美元最近汇率强势有关。 美元汇率在1月到3月中旬，出现汇率贬值。 这段时间对全球非美股市场有利，整体上涨。 A股港股这段时间里领涨全球。 到了最近两周，美元汇率小幅升值。 对全球非美股市场影响比较大。 其中韩股、日股等波动更大一些。 欧股、港 ...